Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel's RAFAEL signs $25m deal with US Navy
Ynetnews,Israel ^ | 11.20.07 | Naama Sikuler

Posted on 11/20/2007 10:57:50 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

RAFAEL signs $25m deal with US Navy

Armament Development Authority, BAE Systems land joint contract to supply US navy with advanced naval weapons systems. Contract second of its kind, to be completed by end of 2009

Naama Sikuler

Published: 11.20.07

Israel's RAFAEL Armament Development Authority and US based BAE Systems announced Tuesday they were awarded a joint, $36 million weapons contract by the US Navy.

The two will supply the US Navy with 62 Typhoon naval weapons systems by the end of 2009.

The Typhoons are a range of remotely operated naval stabilized weapon systems, designed to combat ocean-based terror. They are already in use by several naval forces around the world.

This is the second contract the US Navy awards Rafael and BAE: In 2006, the two were awarded a $28 million contact, to supply the American naval forces with 67 Typhoon systems, which are now in operational deployment.

RAFAEL's reported stake in the contract is $25 million.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bae; baesystems; banglist; defensecontractors; israel; navalgun; rafael; usn
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Typhoon Naval Optronic Stabilized Weapon Platform

1 posted on 11/20/2007 10:57:52 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks like it has a dash-cam...cool


2 posted on 11/20/2007 10:59:46 AM PST by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

..that reminds me of the Phalanx system, which I used to help build...


3 posted on 11/20/2007 11:01:02 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

BAE SYSTEMS AWARDED $36 MILLION U.S. NAVY CONTRACT FOR 25MM GUN SYSTEMS TO PROTECT SHIPS

29 Oct 2007 | Ref. 339/2007

MINNEAPOLIS - BAE Systems received a $36.3 million contract from the U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center for the production and delivery of 62 MK 38 MOD 2 Machine Gun Systems (MGS). The gun systems will be delivered between July 2008 and June 2009.

The MK 38 fulfills the critical role of ship self-protection by providing naval vessels with a highly lethal, last layer of defense. The MK 38 is a 25mm, stabilized remote-controlled gun system that has an effective range of more than 2,000 meters. It is highly autonomous, proven against multiple surface threats and is a critical asset in our global war on terrorism.

“The performance of the MK 38 brings significantly higher reliability and improved operational availability to the most important team - our Navy, its ships and sailors who depend on the MK 38s for protection,” said Dennis Morris, BAE Systems’ president of Armament Systems.

Including this latest order, BAE Systems has been contracted to deliver a total of 150 MK 38 MOD 2 Machine Gun Systems for installation aboard various U.S. Navy surface combatants and amphibious ships. The proposed program of record calls for a total of 243 systems through FY 2015.

The MK 38 is currently in service on eleven ships and will be installed on selected U.S. Navy ships including CG, DDG, LHA, LHD, LSD, PC, FFG and LPD class ships, as well as several Coast Guard vessels. The main weapon on the MK 38 MOD 2 is the M242 25mm Chain Gun, a proven NATO-standard cannon with selectable rates of fire. The MK 38 fires all USN-approved 25mm ammunition at 180 rounds per minute, with 168 rounds on-mount. Additionally, the systems’ four-axis stabilized electro-optical sensor provides round-the-clock surveillance capability day and night, enhancing a ship’s overall mission effectiveness.

“This system gives our sailors a decisive edge when they’re dealing with small boat threats or other close-encounter dangers,” said Morris.

BAE Systems is teamed with RAFAEL Armament Development Authority, Ltd., for the development and production of the MK 38 MOD 2 MGS. The systems will be assembled and tested at BAE Systems’ Louisville, Kentucky facility.


4 posted on 11/20/2007 11:16:29 AM PST by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner
..that reminds me of the Phalanx system, which I used to help build...

The Phalanx is often referred to as looking like "R2D2" because of the dome for the radar.

 

I think this new one also looks like a Star Wars droid, the battle droid or "droideka"

 

A few years ago a co-workers husband was finishing out his final years in the Navy by heading up the team fitting out of the CIC in the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan and seeing it through it's sea trials.  I heard that the unofficial nick name of that ship was going to be "Ronny ray gun." The reason supposedly was because it had twice as much power generating capabilities in it's nuclear reactors (it has two and according to the story they're have more than output than earlier ones) and they intend to use some of the power for a directed energy (laser or particle beam) CIWS to replace the Phalanx.  I asked her to ask him if that was true and she said he couldn't answer the question and she figured that made it true.  They may have just been messing with me, however.

5 posted on 11/20/2007 11:34:28 AM PST by Phsstpok (When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Anyone know why someone would want this system @ 180 25mm rds/min versus Phalanx @ 4,500 20 mm rds/min?

They seem to be described as having a very similar mission.


6 posted on 11/20/2007 2:01:19 PM PST by JewishRighter ( Anyone But Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

tried to find accurate data on unit costs. Seems like the phalanx runs anywhere from a couple million to 5 million and change versus typhoon @ .5 mil. Operating costs also were quite a bit higher, so maybe its just the cost factor.


7 posted on 11/20/2007 2:19:00 PM PST by JewishRighter ( Anyone But Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter
... proven against multiple surface threats...

You want to waste your air defense against small watercraft, then have Iran's "10,000" missiles inbound while you're trying to reload the Phalanx?

8 posted on 11/20/2007 2:30:49 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

It is cheaper and not autonomous so accidents are less likely to occur.


9 posted on 11/20/2007 3:23:43 PM PST by rmlew (Build a wall, attrit the illegals, end the anchor babies, Americanize Immigrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter
Hi JR, They have a different mission profile; the CIWS is still the "golden standard" last line of defense for inbound missile's, cruise and ballistic theater based tactical weapons. The typhoons (this BAE gun system) are specifically used for point defense from less exotic and probably more common littoral threats eg. speedboats, Borghammers etc,,, What we like to call "Smoke on the Water" and then "Fire in the Sky" when we are finished with them.

High rates of fire are a colossal waste of ammo when all we need is a few well placed chain gun rounds to destroys inflatables, speedboats etc,,, Your point on reloading the CIWS is completely without merit. It's done almost as fast as the six barrel Gatling style gun runs out of rounds. Maybe an active duty gunner's mate can comment on this, but when they were relatively new weapons, we could reload them in less than 15 seconds. Understand, that this was the stated reloading time, not the actual time necessary to do the job. It could be done faster by highly motivated personnel. Prior to this guns system, we used M2's and M-60's which were insufficient.

10 posted on 11/20/2007 3:26:50 PM PST by STD (Shark Bait & Chum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: STD

Excellent explanation, thank you. Love the Fire in the Sky bit.

I guess the short answer is: different mission and the typhoon is the cost/effective tool for the job.


11 posted on 11/20/2007 3:57:48 PM PST by JewishRighter ( Anyone But Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson