To: aruanan
True that. I’d put Dembski and Behe up against Mac Johnson in a debate about science, and bet the house on the former. Shoot, I’d put Dembski and Behe up against any of the yahoos who routinely stump for evolution here on FR, and bet the house on the former.
5 posted on
11/15/2007 5:33:57 AM PST by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(Conservatives - Freedom WITH responsibility; Libertarians - Freedom FROM responsibility)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Shoot, I’d put Dembski and Behe up against any of the yahoos who routinely stump for evolution here on FR, and bet the house on the former. Of course you would. But insults in the second paragraph aside the author is basically correct. ID is Creationism under an alias. And ID theory consists not of trying to prove their viewpoint, i.e. identify their designer and His methods, but trying to disprove Evolution and claim victory by default.
7 posted on
11/15/2007 5:38:04 AM PST by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
I’d put Dembski and Behe up against Mac Johnson in a debate about science, and bet the house on the former. Shoot, I’d put Dembski and Behe up against any of the yahoos who routinely stump for evolution here on FR, and bet the house on the former. I know that astrology is not science. Behe doesn't.
I'm having some remodeling done on my house; please vacate yours ASAP so I have a quiet place to live in the interim.
56 posted on
11/15/2007 6:23:04 AM PST by
steve-b
(Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson