A Ban on Ron Paul Supporters

The New York Times ^ | October 24, 2007 | Kate Phillips

[jack_napier]

If Ron Paul supporters can nuke polls, then anti-Paulites can set up fake websites...

[afnamvet]

Thanks for your reply. I don't care a wit about Ron Paul. His position on war is quite different than that of Bush. Paul doesn't support preemptive strikes to avoid a war on our own homeland.

Jefferson warned us against foreign entanglements but here in the 21st century 9/11 changed all of that. We all live, with the exception of Paul, in very dangerous times. Paul was probably in the room when the Constitution was signed.

Thanks again.

[Grunthor]

“Ron Paul’s people REALLY need to get a new party.”

They already have one and it is aptly represented by a jackass.

[listenhillary]

The home page links back to Ron Pauls campaign page. You would think they would have noticed by now. Don’t you?

[SaxxonWoods]

My post still applies, just change “Dr. Paul” to “Duncan Hunter.” Except that Duncan is several spots higher on my list than Paul or Rudy.

[Kevmo]

Here, go spend some time on the bugzapper thread and see what silly names JimRob has for tootyfruityrudy, starting with Socialist. Then check out the GiulianiTruthFile. Once you get JimRob to withdraw the “silly names” then I’ll do the same.

Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts
vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

[nosofar]

The free speech argument is stupid. No one who puts out the cash to host a web site is obligated to accept comments from anyone. They have every right to pick and choose who posts. If someone doesn’t like being ‘banned’ for whatever reason from one particular web site, they can go to another. Some of these ‘free speech’ fanatics act like people are getting banned from the internet itself. *sheesh*

[Abcdefg]

Thanks!

[gunnedah]

Your assessment of the situation sounds very reasonable to me. You have the same feeling about Rudy as I do along with Ron Paul. My point is that the brow beating does not work.Also I have posted on this forum every since I started on a computer and I do not really look at the posters name as such but read the ideas and thoughts and give them a going over unless it seems to ridiculous to me. I am tired of all the lies and the same old crowd running our government and that is from either party.I am also tired of voting for the lesser of two evils.I am tired of all the government give aways,trips and freebies so this is the place that Paul has made me look at. I disagree tremendously on the war and a lot of his social stands but he can be no worse than what most of those running present because he cannot change issues that the majority will not go along with so I know deep down his attempts are probably futile. But I tell you this with all the lying and finger pointing that goes on in DC America is in real trouble if she doesn't change drastically. We are being ruled by Kings and Queens and it is time to stop these machines of corruption.I helped elect Clinton because of George Bush's finger waving on new taxes and Nafta I think it was.A crook is a crook and a liar is a liar in my book.We no longer have statesmen. America is a corrupt nation and we are going to fall if we do not rehabilitate Washington,DC and all the hamlets around this country. We have produced a way of life that should not be acceptable to people with a conscience.