Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary's Hurdles: Dubious Donors (Hillary and illegal hyphenates-perfect together)
New York Post ^ | October 24, 2007 | MICHELE MALKIN

Posted on 10/24/2007 5:58:04 AM PDT by Liz

The NY Post and LA Times uncovered dishwashers, cooks and other suspect Hillary campaign contributors in Chinatown, Flushing, The Bronx and Brooklyn who were limited-income, limited-English-proficient and smellier than stinky tofu. One Asian donor admitted "to lacking the legal-resident status required for giving campaign money." Another was reimbursed for her $1,000 donation - setting off clear alarm bells over yet another possible straw donor scheme on the heels of Norman Hsu-gate.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: donors; foreignmoney; herheinous; hillary; hsugate; illegals; malkin; shillary
.........a donor admitted "to lacking the legal-resident status required for giving campaign money." Another was reimbursed for a $1,000 donation - setting off clear alarm bells over yet another possible straw donor scheme on the heels of Norman Hsu-gate...........

MODUS OPERANDI The hyphenate scam surfaces once again----politicians are balkanizing our UNITED STATES into hyphenated segments---handing out government freebies to those who pump their campaigns with money. The Hillary---Hsu scam is as filthy as they come.

FReeper calpernia came up with the idea that stolen ID's are part of the Hsu-Hillary scam. Donor names and security info is stolen from credit card lists, senior lists, military lists, etc.

Clinton needs LOTS of names to launder large sums of money into her campaign. She's using hers and Bill's offshore stash and China money, and needs names to circumvent FEC laws on donation limitations.

The actual source of Clinton's money may be from kickbacks, maybe corporations who did not pay taxes on it AND the haul Bill took in from presidential pardons.

The money is laundered, and dispersed thru individual donations..........except that the donors do not even know they were contributors.

The BIG Story here is the Democratic Party aiding and abetting the money-laundering scheme Hsu was running: the party was accepting funds through straw donors, funneled through thugs, illegal immigrants, and phony donors.

1 posted on 10/24/2007 5:58:06 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz

Collecting funds quite sundry,
Leads Hillary to a quandary.
Would I look
Like a dirty crook
If the money came from Chinese Laundry?


2 posted on 10/24/2007 6:01:26 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Where;s the FEC....The FBI?? Where’s MCAin or RustyFeingold?? Where’s the FREAKING MEDIA?? This stuff is ILLEGAL....peole have been RE-IMBURSED in this case AND the HSu case. Oh, right, they will get a FINE in 2012 after the “investigation” by the Clinton FEC. I hate our Justice Sysytem anymore.


3 posted on 10/24/2007 6:09:44 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
TAG this image



       Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Telling you what to think since 1980



Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
"Hillary did not take any illegal money from anyone...
...trust us..."

4 posted on 10/24/2007 6:10:00 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

First Peter Paul and now this. Oh, well, if the Hsu fits, wear it, I guess.

Ntice how the Chinese funded Bill’s campaign and now they’re funding Hitlery’s? Where are Charlie Trie, John Huang,a nd Johnny Chung when you need them?


5 posted on 10/24/2007 7:44:44 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Great Malkin piece, as usual.

What really disturbs me is that the clintons raised cheating at the polls to new levels—millions of bogus votes—and also raised illegal fundraising to new levels—including millions from drug runners, pimps, and international criminals, not to speak of Red Chinese Intelligence on the market for nuclear secrets.

Nothing could be done about this in the 90s, because the clintons had the Justice Department and the FBI in a hammerlock.

When President Bush won in 2000, it looked as if things might yet be turned around. Voter IDs would be tightened up, corrupt officials would be prosecuted, daylight would be shone on illegal alien voters. Those who compiled registration lists from insane asylums, Indian Reservations, and cemeteries would be prosecuted.

Ha. In seven years, nothing whatever has been done. No one has been punished. No rules have been tightened. The clintons still apparently run the Justice Department and the FBI, as well as 95% of the media.

It’s a scary business. If they get back in, there may not be a second chance to pry their fingers from the levers of power.


6 posted on 10/24/2007 8:30:51 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

America’s Power Couple, the “Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001” and Herself, the Cold and Joyless, has fooled us before with the “voluntary” contributions bundled and delivered by the immigrant and resident Chinese (and other Oriental) people living at the low end of the poverty scale.

And here we are, about to be fooled again, and so little attention is being called to the obvious disconnect. It matters not whether the funds being funnelled into the coronation of Herself come from George Soros or the People’s Liberation Army.

It’s all tainted, and is done with an expected quid pro quo. None of which benefits the interests of the United States in any positive way.


7 posted on 10/24/2007 9:13:34 AM PDT by alloysteel (Ignorance is no handicap for some people in a debate. They just get more shrill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
It matters not whether the funds being funnelled into the coronation of Herself come from George Soros or the People’s Liberation Army.It’s all tainted, and is done with an expected quid pro quo. None of which benefits the interests of the United States in any positive way.

Amen.

8 posted on 10/24/2007 9:34:56 AM PDT by Liz (Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson