Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barred, the Christian Foster Parents who refused to tell boys it's great being gay
Daily Express ^

Posted on 10/24/2007 5:13:08 AM PDT by UKrepublican

BARRED, THE CHRISTIAN FOSTER PARENTS WHO REFUSED TO TELL BOYS: IT'S GREAT BEING GAY

CHRISTIAN couple who fostered 28 children have been forced to quit be­cause they refuse to promote homosexuality.

Vincent Matherick, 65, and wife Pauline, 61, have also had their 11-year-old foster son removed from their care after their failure to sign a contract enforcing sexual equality.

They say social services told them they must tell children it is “good” to be homosexual. They must also take them to gay meetings if they were curious about same-sex relationships.

The Mathericks’ “crime” was to refuse to sign, on principle, an agreement implementing new laws which promote sexual equality.

The couple say they neither condemn nor condone homosexuality but cannot promote it because of their religious beliefs.

Officials told them they would be taken off the foster carers’ register and be unable to care for any more children if they objected – which they did.

Their 11-year-old foster son, who has been with them for two years, will go to a council hostel. Mr Matherick, a retired travel agent who is now a Christian minister, said they had been forced to retire from fostering rather than be deregistered.

The primary school governor said: “I could not agree to do it because it is against my central beliefs. We have never discriminated against anybody but I cannot preach the benefits of homosexuality when I believe it is against the word of God.”

The Mathericks have three children of their own, six grandchildren and one great-grandchild and both are ministers at the non-conformist South Chard Christian Church, near their home in Chard, Somerset.

They began fostering in 2001, taking in single mothers with their babies, and then moved on to caring for children of primary school age. In the last seven years they have fostered 28 children through Somerset County Council’s social services and are still in contact with many.

In February a social worker arrived at their home to tell them about the implementation of the Sexual Orientation Regulations which outlaws discrimination on the grounds of sexuality.

Mr Matherick says an official told them: “You have to agree to promote homosexuality. If you don’t, you will be deregistered.”

The couple have decided to retire rather than be humiliated.

They asked if they could continue caring for their foster son until he was found another home but the council refused.

Mrs Matherick said they had been forced to hide the truth of the row from their foster son and simply say they were retiring.

“He was very upset,” she said. “We are all very close but he’s a mature young man and he’s dealing with it. I hope he doesn’t find out about the reality.”

Mr Matherick said: “It’s terrible that we’ve been forced into this corner. There are not enough foster carers around anyway without these rules. They said we had to be prepared to talk about sexuality with 11-year-olds and to explain how gay people date.

“They said we would even have to take a teenager to gay association meetings. How can I do that when it’s against what I believe?

“I can’t condone homosexuality but we don’t con­front people about it.” Somer­set Council, which has 72 children which it is unable to house with foster parents, said the row was “not about promoting homosexuality but about carers being aware of equality issues.”

Charlotte Thorneycroft of Christ­ian Concern for Our Nation, said it was “discrimination against Christians” to stop a couple fostering because of their belief in the traditional family.

Tory MP David Davies said: “I’m certain social services would never dare to ask a member of any other established religion to agree to such a stance on homosexuality.”

The Mathericks will fight the case with the help of the Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship.


TOPICS: United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: breeders; christians; europeanchristians; gaystapotactics; hedonismandstate; homosexualagenda; parentalrights; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
UK Ping list - if you would like on or off, freepmail me.

1 posted on 10/24/2007 5:13:10 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tribune7; SoCalPol; Lil'freeper; mrsmel; wideawake; chasio649; expatpat; HanneyBean; goose; ...

PING


2 posted on 10/24/2007 5:13:48 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

those who foster hate crimes legislation in the US are aiming for this type society.


3 posted on 10/24/2007 5:15:53 AM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

Why don’t they just ban Christians from being foster parents? See where it gets them.


4 posted on 10/24/2007 5:17:33 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
Tory MP David Davies said: “I’m certain social services would never dare to ask a member of any other established religion to agree to such a stance on homosexuality.”

Any ROP foster caregivers there?...............

5 posted on 10/24/2007 5:20:52 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I doubt they dare to ask potential Muslim foster parents to do the same. Even if they do, the Muslim foster parents simply sign the document but ignore it. When people ask why the kid is not brought to the homosexuality meetings, they simply say our culture prevents it, and people would stop asking.


6 posted on 10/24/2007 5:22:54 AM PDT by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
those who foster hate crimes legislation in the US are aiming for this type society.

They are, in all practicality, here now. If anyone says anything, even remotely, that is considered (by them) libelous toward a "protected" class or group, all hell breaks loose in denouncing that person or organization. They may not get their Hate Crimes Laws passed, but they WILL be enforced...............

7 posted on 10/24/2007 5:24:44 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
My mind is boggled.
The government actually wants aberrant behavior endorsed and even forcing it's citizens to recognize it as a good thing. We have truly become Orwellian.
8 posted on 10/24/2007 5:26:49 AM PDT by ladtx ( "I don't know how I got over the hill without getting to the top." - - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

I wager a bet that most of the foster parents are Christians. Let’s see them whine about a shortage of foster parents.


9 posted on 10/24/2007 5:27:33 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"Why don’t they just ban Christians from being foster parents? See where it gets them."

That's the whole point, my dear. They've already driven Catholic Social Services to disband; now they're going after individual foster parents. They want NO believers to foster children, even if that means the kids will be stuck in institutional care until they're 18 or dead, whichever comes first.

10 posted on 10/24/2007 5:27:54 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

I heard the lady in this story interviewed by BBC Radio.

They played a soundbite of her in the Radio 2 news at 8AM Monday morning UK time.

I wonder if the police will now knock on her door for “inciting hatred.”

That happened to a woman who opposed gay adoption in another BBC Radio interview.


11 posted on 10/24/2007 5:28:34 AM PDT by Nextrush (Proudly uncommitted in the 2008 race for president for now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

I really wonder why the left is promoting this so fanatically. Is it because they hate Christianity? Or do they hate Christianity because they love this “alternate life style”?
Do they want the human race to become extinct? Do they want to destroy the family and have all births be by test tube?


12 posted on 10/24/2007 5:29:03 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

It won’t happen, though. This is just a one-family incident. I’m suggesting that if all Christians stood up for their principles, they would not get away with it because of what you just said. No matter what they think about people who won’t tow the line on their politically correct mandates, they aren’t going to just herd these kids into institutions for the rest of their childhood. They’ll pretend that it’s not an issue in order to get Christians to come back to the table.

The problem is that you can’t make any headway when it’s only one family that has a problem with their mandates.


13 posted on 10/24/2007 5:33:50 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Wasn’t it in the UK (Scotland maybe) where a homosexual couple routinely sexually abused the childen in their foster home and the “state” did nothing fearing a backlash for hounding homosexuals?


14 posted on 10/24/2007 5:36:15 AM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I believe you are correct - it wasn’t long ago, I think I posted the story.


15 posted on 10/24/2007 5:40:41 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

Disgusting


16 posted on 10/24/2007 5:41:18 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
This is from Scrappleface, right?
17 posted on 10/24/2007 5:41:20 AM PDT by Gritty (The politically correct see themselves as tolerant, but are bullies of the worst sort-EM Tyrrell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Investigative Panel: "Gay" Status Helped Couple Get Away with Sexually Abusing Foster Children (09/06/2007)
18 posted on 10/24/2007 5:48:40 AM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
They should sue on freedom of religion grounds. It would be an interesting case, especially when Islam is dragged into it for comparison.
I'd like to see if Muslim foster parents promote homosexuality, tell their charges that it is "good", and take them to gay parades.
More likely the opposite happens. But gay activists keep their mouths shut when it comes to Islam.
Ultimately, people will just quit being foster parents. It just isn't worth all the BS. In fact they should all turn in their charges to the state in protest now, and smarten up this nonsense.
19 posted on 10/24/2007 5:59:27 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged
I really wonder why the left is promoting this so fanatically. Is it because they hate Christianity?

Here's what a Christian would say: The essence of sin is the refusal to submit to God as supreme master. It happens that He invented sex for purposes of His own (one of which is our enjoyment, btw), and to accomplish those purposes, He has set down some rules for it.

What we call the left is just a political expression of the rejection of God as Master. Leftists consider that they have the right to make all their own rules. Their ideal is absolute personal autonomy, but that is not possible in a world with more than one person in it. The minute you put two people within contact distance, each is curbed to some extent by the other. It turns out that the left is willing to accept practically any sort of limitation in tradeoff as long as it leaves them free to chase what is for them The Big One: absolute sexual freedom. You can tax them, regulate them, herd them here and there, but don't tell them who they can't take to bed. Especially, you don't remind them that Somebody Whom they would rather ignore has something to say about it.

20 posted on 10/24/2007 6:02:39 AM PDT by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson