It would seem that the work he does for the GOP would outweigh the benefits to the DNC done by his contribution. Seems like the contribution would just be peeing in the wind.
It does sound like a conflict of interest.
Two things are incredible incomprehensible thus far:
1. Why only $200 a piece in donation to the Dem? $200 is squat. Its enough to become public but not enough to actually get anybody elected. So....what was this symbolic donation supposed to get this lawyer?
2. Why was this lawyer not brought on the carpet to defend his continued employment? Its one thing if some dude at his firm made the donation (but even then I’d still be worrying about data/strategy loss within the office), but since it was him personally there should have been more accountability beyond his ‘relief’ that it didn’t cost him a paying account.
3. Are there no other GOP lawyers in CO who don’t have some misplaced loyalty who could have lobbied to get the work?
A RAT mole?