Skip to comments.The Real Terror Paymasters
Posted on 10/21/2007 2:24:07 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow
In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yuri Andropov told me, a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions.
In the quote above, Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, head of the DIE, the KGBs little sister in communist Romania, reveals a conversation he had with chairman Andropov, the Soviet leader. We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, Andropov told Pacepa, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter, the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe.
Gen. Pacepa, who defected to the United States in 1978, recounted this story in an August 24, 2006 article for National Review entitled Russian Footprints. According to Andropov, said Pacepa, the Islamic world was a waiting petri dish in which we could nurture a virulent strain of America-hatred, grown from the bacterium of Marxist-Leninist thought. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism, and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch.
Gen. Pacepa explained how this was put into operation:
In the mid 1970s, the KGB ordered my service, the [Romanian] DIE along with other East European sister services to scour the country for trusted party activists belonging to various Islamic ethnic groups, train them in disinformation and terrorist operations, and infiltrate them into the countries of our sphere of influence. Their task was to export a rabid, demented hatred for American Zionism by manipulating the ancestral abhorrence for Jews felt by the people in that part of the world. Before I left Romania for good, in 1978, my DIE had dispatched around 500 such undercover agents to Islamic countries. According to a rough estimate received from Moscow, by 1978 the whole Soviet-bloc intelligence community had sent some 4,000 such agents of influence into the Islamic world.
Likewise, Anatoliy Golitsyn, one of the most important KGB defectors to come to the West, noted in his 1995 book, The Perestroika Deception, Under concealed Russian guidance, the Muslims of the former Soviet Union will seek to cooperate and ally themselves with Muslims in Iran and the Arab states while Russia maintains its open policy of cooperation and partnership with the West. In this way China openly and Russia secretly will jointly attempt to swing the balance of power in their favor in the highly strategic, oil-producing Arab/Iranian areas of the Middle East.
A July 1997 article by Associated Press writer Anthony Shadid provides one measure of the impact of this Soviet KGB (and ongoing Russian FSB) strategy. The AP story, Marxism Makes Way for Islam, profiles a number of influential Marxist-Muslim intellectuals. It begins with the observation that on the bookshelf of Adel Hussein sits an odd collection for one of Egypts leading Islamic thinkers. Titles like Socialist Integration, On Communism, and Planning in the U.S.S.R. by leading Marxists, notes Mr. Shadid, speak more of class struggle than the hand of God.
Like a surprising number of others across the Arab and Muslim world, Adel Hussein is a one-time Marxist and nonbeliever who has turned to Islam, part of a new intellectual generation reshaping the religion. I benefited from Marx in both theory and practice, Hussein told Shadid, but now, Islam is my starting point and my framework. That doesnt mean hes abandoned Marx, however. Hussein, for instance, says his goals have not changed, Shadid reported. But he now sees Islam, through its ability to persuade and to mobilize, as the best tool. In other words, Islam for Hussein is a means to an end, and the end is a Marxist world.
Adel Hussein, says APs Shadid, is representative of a significant number of todays influential imams and mullahs. In a jarring twist, they are the same thinkers who a generation ago drew the ire of religious Muslims because their Marxist disavowal of God was seen as the biggest threat to Islam, Shadid reported. Today, they are often the public face of Islam writing in leading Arabic newspapers, speaking at conferences and on television talk shows, enjoying the support of many younger, more political Muslims interested in their attempts to rethink Islams relationship to democracy, minorities and the West.
Evidence for the existence of an ongoing Soviet/Russian strategic plan to foment and use Islamic extremism is very extensive and goes far to explain the inordinate hatred of Muslim fundamentalists for America and the West. Not only is al-Qaeda aligned with the Kremlin (see the article "Behind Islamic Terror"), so are the other major Islamist terror groups including PLO/al-Fatah, Hamas, and Hezbollah (see "Who's Who In Terrorism" below). Of course, none of those groups would amount to much if not for the immense assistance they receive from Iran and Syria, regimes that were primary client-state terror sponsors for the Soviets and continue in that role for Russia under Putin.
Putin continues to build Irans nuclear program and upgrade its long-range missile program, not to mention provide Ahmadinejads regime with all of the conventional weapons that Tehran and its surrogate terrorists can use. Likewise for the longtime terrorist-sponsoring regime of Bashar al-Asad in Damascus. In January 2005, Putin welcomed President al-Asad to Moscow and forgave 73 percent of the $13.4 billion debt owed by Syria to Moscow. Then, a couple months later, he sold Strelet surface-to-air missiles to Asad and has been showering him with weapons.
In the 2005 action film Lord of War, Nicolas Cage plays Russian arms dealer Yuri Orlov, whose merchandise guns, tanks, grenades, missiles, planes, bombs spreads slaughter and genocide across Africa. The fictional Orlov is a portrayal of the real-life Viktor Bout, a former KGB officer who has built a global empire with his fleet of Soviet transport planes and helicopters and his unmatched access to a bottomless supply of Soviet armaments. It would be difficult to find a war, civil war, revolution, terrorist organization, dictatorship, coup, or attempted coup in Africa, the Middle East, or Central Asia over the past decade and a half that hasnt been fueled by Bouts deadly merchandise.
Viktor Bout was for years the main arms supplier for the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan. He subsequently became a major supplier to the U.S.-backed Northern Alliance. While operating a dizzying array of companies and shell companies out of Belgium and the United Arab Emirates, Bout has always maintained a home base and safe haven in Russia.
When the Belgian government issued an international arrest warrant for him in 2002, Bout fled to Moscow. Asked if Bout was in the country when the arrest warrant was issued, the Russian foreign ministry said no, even though Bout was giving live radio interviews from studios in downtown Moscow, note Douglas Farah and Stephen Braun, authors of Merchant of Death: Money, Guns, Planes, and the Man Who Makes War Possible. The next day, officials grudgingly acknowledged he might be in Russia but said they had seen no evidence that he had committed any crime, and therefore could not act.
According to Farah and Braun and other investigative reporters, Viktor Bout more recently has been running arms to Hezbollah in Lebanon and the forces of the radical Islamic Courts Union in Somalia. Bouts status as a private entrepreneur provides protective deniability to his bosses in the Kremlin including the top KGB/FSB man himself, Vladimir Putin but it is obvious that they are supplying him and protecting him so he can continue stoking the fires of terror and revolution that they have sparked and fed for decades. Incredibly, Western governments that verbally condemn Bouts sinister blood trade are more than willing to do business with his companies. For instance, the U.S. Defense Department has paid Bouts air transport companies millions of dollars to fly supplies into U.S. bases in Afghanistan and Iraq.
As indispensable as Viktor Bout has been and is to the Kremlins ongoing terror strategy, there are others who are even more important. One of the most important is Yevgeniy Primakov, the former KGB chief in charge of Middle East terrorism during the Cold War. Primakov has been at the pinnacle of Soviet politics for decades: Soviet Politburo member, former Russian Foreign Minister, head of the Russia Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), and Russian prime minister. Now he is Putins right-hand man as a private citizen. As head of the Russia Chamber of Commerce, he continues his role directing Russias client terror states and terrorist groups while on commercial visits throughout the Mideast.
In 2006, Primakov presided at the founding meeting of Russias new forum for Muslim countries, the Russia-Islamic World Strategic Vision Group. The new group held its first session in Moscow on March 27-28, attended by delegates from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran, and 12 additional Muslim states. Putin greeted the delegates. Significantly, the statesman who presided at the meeting was Primakov, a renowned Arabist who played a key role in formulating the Soviet Unions ties with the Muslim world during the cold-war era.
Is the ongoing Soviet/Russian propaganda and terror strategy really at the heart of the militant jihadist hatred directed at the United States? The overwhelming evidence would seem to answer resoundingly in the affirmative. After all, the jihadists should have good reason to view as enemies the regimes in Moscow, Beijing, and the Commonwealth of Independent States that have killed Muslims on a daily basis. In fact, the Soviet Union murdered over one million Muslim Afghans and made over five million of them refugees. Post-Soviet Russia brutally subjugated Muslim Chechnya, killing tens of thousands of civilians and leaving hundreds of thousands homeless. The Soviet Union persecuted (and present-day Russia continues to persecute) tens of millions of Muslims in Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan. The current openly communist government of Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan carried out the Adijan massacre of 2005, slaughtering as many as 5,000 Muslim civilians, with Moscow and Beijing both publicly voicing support for Karimovs action. Communist China has carried out a decades-long ruthless persecution of its Muslim Uighar minority.
Communist regimes have forbidden study of the Quran, publicly burned countless copies of this sacred text of Muslims, imprisoned and tortured Muslim believers, and beaten Muslim clerics and then paraded them in public humiliation. Contrast that with the Western countries, where Muslims are granted full political and economic rights, can worship freely, and can obtain a Quran at any library or local bookstore. Yes, the jihadists have used our military presence in Iraq to fan the flames of hatred against the United States, but how about the communists?
Do the jihadists hate America more than the non-Muslim communist states because we are uniquely decadent? It is true that Western post-Christian culture, especially as seen in popular fashions and through Hollywoods ubiquitous and depraved lens, is offensive to devout Muslims (as it is to devout Christians). But Russia is not pristine by comparison. Putins Russia boasts one of the largest pornography industries in the world, featuring the most hard-core kiddie porn. Russias mainstream media is much more salacious than its counterparts in the United States. Russia and the Muslim-populated (but non-Muslim-ruled) countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (C.I.S.) are also notorious for forced prostitution, gambling, and the production, consumption, and export of drugs and alcohol, all of which should earn them condemnation from the militant Muslim faithful. Instead, the leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, al-Fatah, and other Islamic fundamentalists, not only ignore the transgressions of their infidel sponsors in Russia and China and the cries of their persecuted Muslim brothers, but they regularly break bread with and publicly support the atheist persecutors of Islam.
We in the Christian West should not kid ourselves as certain liberals would have us do into accepting the false proposition that Islam is perfectly compatible with our social-political system. It is not (see article "Religion By The Sword"). And we must not succumb to their arguments that we should accept new waves of Muslim immigrants. But neither should we allow ourselves to be further dragged into a military clash of civilizations (as we already are in Iraq and Afghanistan) by Muslim front men for our so-called allies in Moscow and Beijing.
In his October 11, 2001 news conference, President George W. Bush characterized the new global conflict as a war against all those who seek to export terror, and a war against those governments that support or shelter them. Striking the same theme, but with greater specificity, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol declared in a July 21, 2006 article, Radical Islam Takes On Democracy, that our focus should be less on Hamas and Hezbollah, and more on their paymasters and real commanders Syria and Iran.
But why stop with the middlemen? The real paymasters and commanders arent in Damascus and Tehran; theyre in Moscow and Beijing, as they have been for decades. These paymasters and commanders are also patient strategists. They will not try to engage us in head-on military conflict when they can more easily wear us down by leading us into many quagmire conflicts with their surrogates.
PLO/al-Fatah. For nearly four decades, the PLO has been the largest, wealthiest, and most politically connected terrorist organization in the world. For most of that time, it was held in the firm grip of Yasser Arafats iron fist. But Arafat was not the fierce, independent actor he posed as; he was completely dependent on the Soviet KGB and its surrogate Warsaw Pact intelligence services for arms, training, logistical support, funds, and direction. His KGB handlers included Vasali Samoylenko, Vladimir Buljakov, and Soviet Ambassador Alexander Soldatov. Arafats closest friend and head of PLO intelligence, Hani Hassan, was actually an agent of the DIE, the Romanian subsidiary of the KGB.
Former DIE chief General Ion Pacepa reported in a 2003 Wall Street Journal article:
I was given the KGBs personal file on Arafat. He was an Egyptian bourgeois turned into a devoted Marxist by KGB foreign intelligence. The KGB had trained him at its Balashikha special-ops school east of Moscow and in the mid-1960s decided to groom him as the future PLO leader. First, the KGB destroyed the official records of Arafats birth in Cairo, replacing them with fictitious documents saying that he had been born in Jerusalem and was therefore a Palestinian by birth.
During the 1960s and 70s, Arafat and the PLO did not hide their Marxist ideology and openly proclaimed their solidarity with the Soviet Union, Communist China, Communist Cuba, and every other Marxist dictatorship. But in recent years, as communist-backed Islamic fundamentalist groups like Hamas have gathered more popular support, the PLO leadership has attempted to portray itself as authentically Muslim. It has adopted more religious rhetoric and used Muslim names and symbols, even naming Islam as the official and exclusive religion of Palestine in the 2003 Palestinian constitution. Since Arafats death in 2004, veteran PLO hand Mahmoud Abbas has tried, unsuccessfully, to fill his shoes.
Hamas swept to power in the 2006 parliamentary elections (winning 76 seats to Fatahs 43), and in June 2007 Hamas military took control of the Gaza Strip in a series of gun battles through the streets of Gazas cities that left 120 people dead and hundreds more wounded. Three of the four so-called Quartet of Middle East peace brokers the United States, United Nations, and European Union announced their backing for Abbas and the PLO and their rejection of Hamas. The remaining member of the quartet, Russia, has been playing both sides. During the last week of July, Mahmoud Abbas visited Putin in Moscow, seeking his endorsement. Putin gave it, but didnt rule out continuing negotiations and relations with Hamas. I want to assure you that we will support you as the lawful leader of the Palestinian people, Putin told Abbas at their July 31 meeting.
Hamas. The Arabic acronym for Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya, or Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas is a Palestinian Sunni terrorist organization founded in 1987 by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. One of Hamas claims to infamy is its popularization of suicide bombing as a terror weapon, pioneering in recruiting females and children as suicide killers. Although posing as the ultimate in Islamic fundamentalism, like al-Qaeda it has a curious relationship with Putins KGB/FSB. According to a March 2006 report by Axis Information and Analysis, At present, five of the seven biggest Hamas websites are functioning from the territory of the CIS member-states. Three of these sites use services of the Russian providers.... There are two more smaller but rather well-known websites that are functioning from Russias territory. This is especially noteworthy since the Putin regime has clamped down on all media and Internet access by its political opposition and all unapproved parties. Hamas Internet sites, which have been so essential in building Hamas stature, recruiting, and propaganda prowess globally, are clearly operating with Putins approval.
Russia does not include Hamas on its list of terrorist organizations. Not surprisingly, Hamas political director, Khaled Mashal, has repeatedly affirmed the organizations close friendship with Moscow. Mashal presides over the Hamas Politburo, which, in name, structure, and function, is much more in line with Marxist-Leninist than Islamist thought. Mashal has led Hamas delegations to Moscow for talks with Putin and has met with Putin and Yevgeniy Primakov, the KGBs top Middle East scholar, at other forums in Khartoum, Tehran, and Ankara. Although Hamas never provided any significant aid to its fellow Muslims who were being slaughtered by the Russians in Chechnya, it did, up until 2004, offer them rhetorical support. Since 2004, though, it has urged the Chechens to heal the wound and surrender in the interest of a strong and integrated Russia.
Hezbollah. In Arabic, Hezbollah means Party of God. But there is little that is godly about the group, which has exploded in size, power, and influence since first coming to Western attention by bombing the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, killing over 300 Marines. It is supported chiefly and directly by Iran and has adopted the revolutionary theology and ideology of Irans Ayatollah Khomeini. It also receives military aid directly and indirectly from Syria and Russia, as manifested by the weapons cases abandoned by Hezbollah after their rocket attacks on Israel last summer. The containers were clearly marked: Customer: Ministry of Defense of Syria. Supplier: KBP, Tula, Russia.
Sheikh Hasan Nasrallah, who has been General Secretary of Hezbollah since 1992, keeps in touch with Moscow through regular communications with Russias Beirut embassy. This was confirmed in a 2006 interview with Russias Ambassador to Israel, Mikhail Bogdanov. That is not the only channel by which Moscow and Beirut stay in touch. In a detailed 2005 report by Axis Information and Analysis, entitled Dangerous Liaisons: Covert Love Affair Between Hezbollah and Russia, author Michel Ebaz reports:
Hezbollahs special operations unit (Muntamat al-Jihad al-Islami MJI or Islamic Jihad Organization) emissaries have been active in Russia since the middle of the nineties. Residing in Moscow, Imad Hadj Hassan Salame heads this special operations unit. His men were an integral part of Hezbollahs international network for smuggling weapons to Lebanon.
Yevgeniy Primakovs appointment in 1996 as Russias Foreign Minister was a critical step in propelling the Hezbollah-KGB relationship forward. As the KGBs most experienced hand in Middle East terrorism matters, he was the perfect choice for insuring a smooth transition when the KGB transformed into the FSB. His official meetings in the 1990s with Lebanons political leaders also provided him (and his assistant, Viktor Pasovaluk) with opportunities to meet secretly with representatives of Hezbollah. In the 2005 elections, Hezbollah and its allies in the Resistance and Development Bloc won 35 seats (27 percent) of the Lebanese parliament.
Bump for later read.
Much of this came out in the late 90s after some of the kg-useta-b archives were opened to the public.
Much of what had been feared of American Commies was confirmed as well.
Why would anyone be surprised by this?
DIE? Ha, what an appropriate acronym...
Super-pertinent, timely and informative article!!! Thank you for posting it.
The Muzzies are also tied in with Hitler’s Nazis, via an previous imam who went to Nazi Germany. This has been covered before here in the Free Republic.
The Commy-Nazi-Muslim web also includes the Leftist American Democrats. You can’t tell their rhetoric from the CNMs.
Indeed, it was the Communist influence on Hollywood that was a key formative experience in Ronald Reagan's life.
Nothing new here. The basic technique of the KGB was to fan third-world hatred of the United States as a colonial power, even though the US has hardly ever been a colonial power. Radical nationalism was the method most widely used.
What’s true of the Muslim world is also true of Africa and South America. The Communists have never stopped stirring up hatred and resentment of the U.S.
And they have managed to get the European Socialists on their side as well. Europe was chiefly guilty of colonial exploitation of the third world, but somehow or other they have managed to blame it on us. Some of it was relatively benevolent colonialism (England); but much of it was malevolent and exploitive (most notoriously Belgium, but also Germany and France).
What goes around comes around. It was the Germans who put Lenin on that train and sent him into Russia. And it was Germany that produced Karl Marx. The disease of exploitive revolutionary progressivism goes back a long way, perhaps to the French Revolution.
I had been looking through some recent articles in the Turkish press and came across what I thought was a curious way to end a piece on the Turkey-Israel relationship.....the final line supports what you have posted.
Its not easy to be absolutely sure, but current events somehow push these two countries toward establishing a new kind of cooperation. Still, even if pressure applied to Turkey through Iran is important, it will not be that credible if the Russian role in all of this is not elucidated. 29.09.2007
(I asked the Mod to zap the post above....this one is corrected)
Andropov was proved right ... remember the "rage boy" pictures? He has something like a 6th grade education.
True. You must be referring to organizations like the Arabisches Freiheitskorps. Take a look at the following :
Read'im and weep.
Thank you. I added your two links to a file I’m keeping on the subject for my own reference.