Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coalition Air Strike in Iraq Claims Lives of Terrorists, Civilians
American Forces Press Service ^

Posted on 10/12/2007 4:50:17 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Oct. 12, 2007 – A coalition air strike yesterday that killed terrorists also claimed the lives of a large number of innocent victims, military officials said.

During an operation to pursue senior al Qaeda leaders in the Lake Thar Thar region, troops encountered small-arms fire from the target building. Responding in self-defense, coalition aircraft engaged the enemies inside the building.

After the air strike, ground forces discovered that 15 terrorists, six women and nine children had been killed. Troops determined that two suspects, one woman and three children also were wounded. Ground forces also detained one suspected terrorist after the strike.

Coalition force medical experts administered treatment to those injured, who were later taken to a nearby military facility for further aid.

A Multinational Force Iraq statement issued today said coalition forces are investigating the incident, which is a standard practice with all incidents involving civilian injuries or deaths.

“We are working closely with local Iraqi officials and tribal leaders to ascertain and provide a full accounting of events. We are further committed to ensuring the needs of those affected are thoroughly respected and provided for,” the statement said.

Army Maj. Brad Leighton, a Multinational Force Iraq spokesman, lamented the civilian victims.

“We regret that civilians are hurt or killed while coalition forces search to rid Iraq of terrorism,” he said. “These terrorists chose to deliberately place innocent Iraqi women and children in danger by their actions and presence.”

(Compiled from Multinational Force Iraq news releases.)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airstrike; civilians; frwn; iraq; killed; terrorists

1 posted on 10/12/2007 4:50:19 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketFR WAR NEWS! Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!


Not for commercial use. For educational and discussion purposes only.
2 posted on 10/12/2007 4:50:55 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Sorry, but if the old man (terrorist) is in the house conducting a meeting, all bets are off. I don’t like the idea of women and children being involved in this, but it wasn’t our choice was it? Dad and Mom made that choice.


3 posted on 10/12/2007 4:54:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Coalition? Time to end that. The coalition be us.


4 posted on 10/12/2007 4:54:22 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“15 terrorists, six women and nine children”

I see that the woman and children have no fathers? Were the women family to the terrorist?

Like all the based reporting coming out of Iraq, there is no way to tell if this was collateral damage or if it was just a whole family of terrorist.

We could have just stopped a breading machine of terrorist or some innocence got cough up in the fighting. There will not be any reporting on the follow up so we will never know the truth.

The point of the article is to show that we kill woman and children. Is there any reason the report could not say “15 terrorists killed with their supporters”? We don’t know that they were innocence any more than we know they were innocence.


5 posted on 10/12/2007 5:13:06 PM PDT by Goldwater and Gingrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Coalition Air Strike in Iraq Claims Lives of Terrorists, Civilians

That’s why they call it “war.


6 posted on 10/12/2007 5:15:54 PM PDT by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown

Will Smith; “Oops”

Jeff Goldberg?: “Oops? What do you mean - Oops?”

“Independence Day”


7 posted on 10/12/2007 5:22:42 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Madmax, the Grinning Reaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater and Gingrich
The point of the article is to show that we kill woman and children.

I agree with you. This is what it was all about. "Let's do another up the posterior examination of these evil members of our military." Contempt doesn't begin to describe with I hold in my heart for the left in our country these days.

8 posted on 10/12/2007 5:25:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

The terrorists and insurgents do NOT wear uniforms.

They imbed themselves within the civilian population and the civilians do NOT seem to object.

Being able to identify the good buys from the bad guys is impossible.
A recent suicide bomber was a man in a burka, so even wearing women’s traditional clothes is ok with the radical’s style of “war”.

You go and try to sort the flyspecks out of the pepper while under attack.
Get back to me and let me know how you do......


9 posted on 10/12/2007 5:36:25 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

I’m on your side.


10 posted on 10/12/2007 5:38:53 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
A coalition air strike yesterday that killed terrorists also claimed the lives of a large number of innocent victims, military officials said. ...

After the air strike, ground forces discovered that 15 terrorists, six women and nine children had been killed. Troops determined that two suspects, one woman and three children also were wounded. Ground forces also detained one suspected terrorist after the strike.

I can imagine no one so calloused as to be indifferent to the suffering and death of innocents. That said, however, the fact remains that in war such things inevitably occur. They cannot be wished away.

What would the critics have us do? Should we (in their opinion) forswear the use of force if such force could conceivably result in the injury or death of mere innocents?

That can be an intellectually consistent position only if one is willing to go all the way, and openly embrace the pacifist ethic. For it is impossible to successfully prosecute a war--and there is no reason to even attempt it--if a nation's leaders should conclude that the death of even one innocent person is an unacceptable price to pay.

And for those of us who treasure our hard-won freedoms, it is scary to think that our president and Congress might ever come to such an unfortunate conclusion.

11 posted on 10/12/2007 5:42:11 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson