Posted on 10/04/2007 7:41:33 AM PDT by Kuksool
SACRAMENTO — A Democratic group on Monday filed formal complaints with the Federal Election Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, accusing Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani of violating campaign laws, including money laundering. The complaints, made by Californians for Fair Election Reform, accuse Giuliani, through his friend Paul Singer, of establishing a Missouri "front" organization to
solicit illegal donations to support a ballot measure that would overturn California's winner-take-all system of allocating electoral votes.
Such a change would provide the Republican presidential nominee a chance to pick up roughly 20 electoral votes by dividing them up by congressional districts.
Singer, a hedge-fund billionaire and a policy adviser and regional finance director for Giuliani, revealed last week that he was the sole contributor to the committee, Take Initiative America, which donated $175,000 to the ballot measure.
Singer's disclosure that he'd contributed to the group came a day after top campaign officials for the GOP-backed electoral initiative — GOP attorney Tom Hiltachk, spokesman Kevin Eckery and fund-raiser Marty Wilson — resigned in protest after the lawyer in charge of Take Initiative America, Charles Hurth III, refused to disclose who contributed to the committee.
Although the initiative effort appears dead — in part because funding never materialized beyond Singer's contribution — the alleged violations are serious, said Chris Lehane, spokesman for the Democratic group.
"We want to get to the bottom of this," he said at a San Francisco news conference.
Singer's contribution, said James Harrison, the attorney who filed the complaint, raises questions about potential money laundering, illegal coordination between a candidate and an independent committee, and whether federal contribution limits were exceeded.
"As an agent of Giuliani's, Singer would be prohibited from soliciting or directing a contribution in excess of $2,300," said Harrison, who works with San Leandro-based Remcho, Johansen & Purcell, a firm specializing in election law. "We'd like the FEC to determine what Giuliani knew, when he knew it, what conversations he and Singer had about the contribution and how TIA was created. Whose idea was it? How did it come about?"
A spokesman for Giuliani denied any coordination with the initiative effort — the Campaign for Equal Representation — or the Take Initiative America committee.
"This is completely independent from our campaign," said Jarrod Agen, "and frankly it's not an initiative that serves our campaign's best interests."
Democrats also accused the Giuliani campaign of trying to conceal Singer's identity.
Under California law, the Campaign for Equal Representation was required to disclose its true source of funding. It identified Take Initiative America, which was created on Sept. 11, but Hurth, the lawyer behind the committee, refused to disclose where the $175,000 came from.
"We know that Singer intended his money to be used for the effort in California," Harrison said, "so, clearly, TIA was nothing more than a pass through.
"In California, that's considered money laundering."
Lehane said he's convinced Giuliani's campaign was behind the effort. He noted that Charles Bell, a partner with Hiltachk's firm, gave $1,300 to Giuliani's campaign days before the initiative was filed; Hurth had given $2,000 to Giuliani; his spokesman, Jonathan Wilcox, was a spokesman for former California GOP candidate Bill Simon; Simon himself is a co-chair for Giuliani's California campaign and a policy adviser.
"When you went through all these folks, virtually every road ultimately led back to Giuliani," Lehane said. "The one conclusion that one could safely draw is that it was the Giuliani campaign that was ultimately behind this."
Giuliani, in a statement last week, said he would have had no reason to be behind the initiative.
"As far as I'm concerned, you can leave it the way it is," he said. "In fact, in some ways you might consider, I think that this is a state I can win. That might actually favor some of the other Republican candidates who might have a more difficult time winning this state. I think this is a state that I've got a 50-50 chance of winning. So as far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't mind leaving it that way."
Contact Steven Harmon at 916-441-2101 or sharmon@cctimes.com.
Since Rooty is blowing off Conservatives, he can fight this corruption scandal on his own.
“A Democratic Group” aka “Hillary sourced”
This is to take heat off her with the Hsu debacle.
Exactly. Classic Clinton War Room stuff.
....................the alleged violations are serious, said Chris Lehane, spokesman for the Democratic group.............
Chris Lehane, Chris Lehane??
Oh I remember, Lehane used to be in der Sinkmeisters circle of friends, and worked with both J F’n Kerry and Weasley Clark.
So I’ll bet Hitlery is behind this smear!
Geez, ya try to clean out the entire nest of roachroaches, yet another queen appears!
It is conservatives who have blown him off and trashed him since he announced, because he is not a conservative ideologue.
But, most Republican candidates and officeholders are on their own when the DNC/MSM comes after them, we tend to throw them overboard the minute they are not shiny anymore, as evidenced by a good conservative saying “macaca”.
I have been around many conservative campaigns over the years, the candidates and staff KNOW their voters are often swayed by the MSM, and often joke that we need robots to run instead of human beings.
Nice try Rose,
Rudy has blown off conservatives by his stand on the issues.
But nice try anyway.
Ping!
As the Rooty Supporters would say, “Are you just going to stand there and allow Hillary to smear the Patron Saint of 9-11? If so, then you are voting for Hillary!”
He has asked conservatives for their vote anyway, stating that he agrees with us on other issues, explaining that he will not work against us, has no agenda against us, and has not been hostile to us, and has campaigned regularly for conservative candidates.
Now, if conservatives don’t believe him and don't want to vote for him, fine, but he has not run around the country talking trash against conservatism.
No sense in creating a big drama, when there is none.
He is simply a Republican who has never cared about social issues, and is not an ideologue, and is trying his hand at running on foreign policy, fiscal policy, ect, instead of social issues.
We shall see if Republican and conservative voters will go for it.
I think its a great primary race, and that we have a super variety to choose from, I’m exicted for the debates.
LOL, since RG called Hillary; “Bill’s leftovers”, she is ticked, what next?
Bill’s sloppy seconds?
Can’t wait for Hill to crack and blow her stack!
When Lehane is quoted, you can be assured that it’s coming from the Clinton campaign.
Paul Singer / Wiki
Singer is generally known as the original ‘vulture’[2] of the for-profit so-called ‘vulture funds’, which buy government bonds from poor countries and demand an exorbitant return on their loans.
In 1996, Singer bought up some of the debt of Peru for $11 million and got back $58 million.[2]
He purchased a bond from the Democratic Republic of Congo for about $10 million, sued in court for $400 million[3] and ended up with $127 million.[2]
Singer is also the Republican Party’s chief donor in New York, and has given a combined $1.7 million to the party since George W. Bush’s first presidential campaign.[4] Singer and Elliot employees make up the top contributor bloc to Rudolph Giuliani’s 2008 presidential run, having donated $168,400.[3] His estimated personal net worth is $700 million.
References (LINKS AT SITE)
1. Elliott Management Corporation Company Profile. Yahoo! Finance. Retrieved on 2007-07-18.
2. a b c “Vulture Fund” Company Seeks $40 Million Payment from Zambia on $4 Million Debt (2007-02-15). Retrieved on 2007-07-18.
3. a b Palast, Greg (2007-06-20). Randi Rhodes and Greg Palast Hunt Giuliani’s Favorite Vulture. Retrieved on 2007-07-18.
4. Jones, Meirion (2007-02-14). ‘Vulture funds’ threat to developing world. BBC Newsnight. Retrieved on 2007-07-18.
Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Singer";
http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:REyEn4ojiJAJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
GOOGLED Paul_Singer+Paul+Singer&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
SINGER PAUL, ELLIOTT CAPITOL ADVISORS, INC. SCHWARZENEGGER - 2006, CALIFORNIANS FOR, ID#1261585 Governor $11,150.00 4/24/2006 SCHWARZENEGGER - 2006, CALIFORNIANS FOR, ID#1261585 Governor $11,150.00 4/24/2006 SCHWARZENEGGER - 2006, CALIFORNIANS FOR, ID#1261585 Governor $11,150.00 2/22/2005 SCHWARZENEGGER'S CALIFORNIA RECOVERY TEAM, GOVERNOR, ID#1261406 $25,000.00 2/20/2004
Rudy is, and has been, working behind the scenes to change all the rules to marginalize conservatives in California. I have no doubt that he (and/or his strategists) were behind this with full knowledge.
Additionally, California moved up the Primary from June to Feb 5, a move which benefits the big money candidates only (i.e. Rudy and only a few others).
The California GOP changed their rules on how delegates are distributed in the Primary election, a move that benefits the most liberal of candidates. Rudy is well aware of this move, having pointed out that it favors him in responding to the Press at last weeks’ endorsement by Pete Wilson.
Some in the California GOP also want to open the Primary to Independent voters, another move they think would benefit Rudy.
Hillary smear? Nah.... the Emperor is just demonstrating that he can’t win a race straight-up and has to change the rules to undermine the voters to achieve his life-long dream of power.
Giuliani has campaigned regularly for conservative candidates (most of whom went down to defeat---as the Nov 2006 Repub debacle attests).
================================================
Giuliani thumbs his nose at conservatives.
Thursday, April 05, 2007
By CNN's Lauren Kornreich
Giuliani to social conservatives: "Take it or leave it"
Excerpt -- WASHINGTON (CNN)-- Rudy Giuliani's message to social conservatives: "If you don't like my views, don't vote for me."
The Republican reaffirmed his support for federal funding for some abortions, a position which puts him at odds with many conservatives. During a press conference at the State Capitol in Columbia, South Carolina, he said he didn't expect to win over 100 percent of the voters. "If that's real important to you, if that's the most important thing, I'm comfortable with the fact that you won't vote for me," the former mayor said.
Specifically, he said he would not change the Hyde amendment, which restricts federal funding for abortion......."
What I don’t get is people saying they will vote for him because of foreign policy or his fiscal record. He has NO foreign policy experience, other than holding hands after a terrible tragedy, but somehow this qualifies him to be CIC? Hardly! As to fiscal record, he’s all for big borrowing and grew government by 70%, leaving NYC with the same deficit it started with instead of building a reserve while residing over the biggest financial boom period in recent years.
Whether one is a social conservative or a fiscal conservative, Rudy’s record stinks!
Wonder what Singer's buying up in Kazashstan, South America and Asia? And what's Rudy's cut?
GIULIANI IS HOLDING A CAMPAIGN FUND-RAISER IN KAZAKHSTAN (that's in the Ukraine).
Kazakhstan is in the Strategic Energy Ellipse and is a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization with China and Russia. A focal point of influence between the West and the East.....(can you say oil and gas pipelines?)
=====================================
Voters, meet Global Rudy. Here's The Rudester's global connections (ones we know of):
(1) Giuliani Capital Advisors, LLC (AKA Giuliani Partners LLC),
(2) Giuliani Group,
(3) Giuliani-Kerik (re-named Giuliani Security and Safety, after the departure of the tainted ex-Police Commissioner),
(4) Giuliani-Van Essen,
(5) Bracewell & Giuliani LLP law firm (based in Texas with global interests),
(6) Bracewell & Giuliani has two offices in Kazakhstan (in the Ukraine), and,
(7) Giuliani Security & Safety, Asia
Bracewell & Giuliani's Almaty, Kazakhstan (in the Ukraine) (January closings totalled $1.625 Billion---they have two offices there). NOTE WELL: ROOTY IS HOLDING A CAMPAIGN FUND-RAISER IN KAZAKHSTAN.
Bracewell & Giuliani's Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., a Spanish transportation company (lobbied for Privatization of Toll Road in Texas)
Bracewell & Giuliani's Banco Santander Central Hispano, S.A. (SAN.MC, STD.N) (a bank that traded with a blacklisted Iranian Bank)
Bracewell & Giuliani's company tied to Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chávez, who has called President Bush "the devil." Bracewell & Giuliani lobbies on behalf of Texas-based Citgo Petroleum, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Venezuelan oil company controlled by Chávez.
=====================================
Rooty's campaign is engaged in a VERY dirty game played by remorseless people: religious cleansing of the party.
The "Everything For Us Nothing For You" types are squatting in the Repub party, plotting to ditch social conservatives, and take over the party.
Oh, speaking of "takeovers"----let's not forget what happened to ex-RNC chair Kenny Mehlman. He's got a lotta time on his hands after being ushered out the door after the 2006 election debacle.
Sweet Jesus, Lord, thank God Kenny LOVES shopping for matching satin sheet sets at Bed, Bath and Beyond. ROTFLMSO.
Oh, that (snicker)----whenever that's mentioned you know it's the agit-prop of the neo-blanks.
Those dancin' fools..........they wiggle real nice to the insistent beat of the 911-WOT Samba.
Maybe they'll win the Dancing With The Stars mirrored ball? ROTFLMSO.
***What I don’t get is people saying they will vote for him because of foreign policy***
Perhaps being friends with the Austrian governor makes you an international relations expert.:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.