Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Continuous-Use Contraceptives to be Introduced in Britain Within Months
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | September 27, 2007 | Hilary White

Posted on 09/30/2007 8:06:06 PM PDT by monomaniac

Continuous-Use Contraceptives to be Introduced in Britain Within Months

By Hilary White

LONDON, September 27, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The first contraceptive pill that provides a dose of active hormones every day that would halt menstruation, could be in use in Britain within a few months, according to the New Scientist. The drug, called Lybrel, is lauded for its ability to interrupt a woman’s normal fertility cycle and entirely stop her menstruation, potentially permanently. Its supporters say that once freed from their normal biological functions, women will be better able to compete with men in the workplace.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), approved the drug in May based on the results of two studies. It comes in a 28 day-pill pack containing 90 micrograms each of a progestin, levonorgestrel, and 20 micrograms of an estrogen, ethinyl estradiol.

Traditional hormonal contraceptive drugs include placebo or pill-free intervals lasting four to seven days that stimulate a menstrual cycle. Lybrel is designed to be taken without the placebo or pill-free time interval. Women who use Lybrel would not have a scheduled menstrual period, but, the FDA notes, will most likely have unplanned, breakthrough, unscheduled bleeding or spotting.

Some studies have shown side effects associated with Lybrel, as with most hormonal contraceptives, can include blood clots in the legs or lungs, gallbladder inflammation, ectopic pregnancy, stoppage or rupture of a blood vessel in the brain (stroke), heart attack, angina, liver tumours and high blood pressure. Some studies have shown association with cervical cancer.

Lybrel’s supporters say the drug, because it entirely halts menstruation, will “end the misery” and inconvenience involved and reduce the symptoms of premenstrual syndrome.

In the Daily Mail’s Thursday print edition Jill Parkin, a columnist on women’s issues, decries the value system that pits women against men in the workforce at the cost of the “basic biology that makes us female”.

“[I]magne filling yourself with chemicals every single day, taken orally and so exposing your entire system to their effect. Imagine pushing doubts about whether or not you’re pregnant to the back of your mind as you check your Blackberry for messages on the train every morning.”

“Compromise is inevitable, but actually shoehorning women in to a man-shaped space is wrong...Scientists have pointed out that we weren’t designed to have decades of periods but to have prolonged breaks for pregnancy and lengthy breastfeeding. But certainly evolution intended that we menstruate.”

The Mail also quotes Dr. Marilyn Glenville, a specialist at the Women’s Healthcare Centre, St John's Wood, London, saying that there is no way of telling what the long-term consequences will be of the new drug and worries that the effects “could be more damaging than the traditional 21-day Pill.” She cites particularly the possible connections of the pill with cervical cancer.

“Countless women will jump at the chance to take Lybrel, not for its contraceptive properties but simply as a lifestyle choice...Ultimately, women will be continuously dosing their body with artificial hormones while suppressing the body's own, without so much as the seven-day break that the body gets when taking the ordinary Pill.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: angina; bloodclots; cervicalcancer; contraceptive; ectopicpregnancy; heartattack; highbloodpressure; livertumours; lybrel; menstruation; prolife; stroke

1 posted on 09/30/2007 8:06:12 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
I wouldn’t know where to start with this one. What the end may be, I am not sure will be justified by the means. One should not mess with hormones.
2 posted on 09/30/2007 8:09:08 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
once freed from their normal biological functions

What the author is too stupid to realize is that those normal biological functions are critical to the continuation of the human race.

3 posted on 09/30/2007 8:10:15 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45
Yes they are! And just as breastfeeding severely lessens the chances of breast cancer, it is the reason it does that few pay attention to. When you interrupt the body's’s natural functions, things get thrown out of whack. Hormones are not something you mess with. Natural OR artificial. Hormones originate in the brain, and they tell the body when it is time to do certain things. When those things are prevented from happening, with chemicals especially, the body rebels.
4 posted on 09/30/2007 8:14:58 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reg45

yes, but what about when you’ve had all the children you want to have?? If I thought that this wouldn’t kill me i’d take it in a heartbeat!!! To never have the Pain of menstration again would be HEAVEN on earth!


5 posted on 09/30/2007 8:23:21 PM PDT by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Gonna be a lot of masculinized women...

Won’t they be pi$$ed when they have to start shaving their faces as well as their legs.


6 posted on 09/30/2007 8:26:35 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annelizly

Increases risk of Breast cancer, Hyperlipidemia, weight gain,h/a, depression, anxiety, panic disorder.Enlarged ovaries, increased incidents of yeast infections.

No drug is totally benign...


7 posted on 09/30/2007 8:30:07 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Its supporters say that once freed from their normal biological functions, women will be better able to compete with men in the workplace.

I can compete 24/7 in the workplace just fine without no stinking drug so @$#*-off

BEING FEMALE IS NOT A DISEASE.

8 posted on 09/30/2007 8:43:13 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annelizly

Give nature time. It will handle it.


9 posted on 09/30/2007 8:49:44 PM PDT by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
As it is, the native Brit birth rate is, correct me if I’m wrong, about 1.7 or so. The Muslim immigrant family birth rate is, correct me if I’m wrong, north of 5. So, when exactly will Britain adopt Islam as the only religion allowed to be practiced there, and impose Sharia there as well as the jizya tax on people who haven’t yet converted?
10 posted on 09/30/2007 9:20:25 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac; pandoraou812
Its supporters say that once freed from their normal biological functions, women will be better able to compete with men in the workplace.

Hey, great. Now all they need is a drug that reduces their breasts, narrows their hips and grows hair on their faces and women will almost be equal to men in the workplace. They'll probably have to learn to fart, belch and pinch butts without medical help though if they really want to make the grade. Can't do it all with drugs.

11 posted on 09/30/2007 10:19:29 PM PDT by TigersEye (Don't taze me, Bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

Fred Reed has written that most men are content to go on being men, and are more than happy to live (and let live) with women actually being women. Too many women, he continues, seem to want everyone to be women.


12 posted on 09/30/2007 11:18:10 PM PDT by flowerplough (Not a sociopath, merely a delusional narcissist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson