Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Audit says Homeland Security not making progress and not preventing another attack
The San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | 9/6/07 | Eileen Sullivan

Posted on 09/06/2007 5:26:33 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor

WASHINGTON – Congressional auditors gave a stinging assessment of the Homeland Security Department's progress and said the department could not take credit for the absence of a terrorist attack on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001. The department's primary mission is to prevent such a strike to and minimize the damage should an attack occur. Auditors said the U.S. is safer than it was that day in 2001, but the department has poorly managed its mission over the past four years.

“I don't think we can take comfort in the fact, necessarily, that we haven't had another attack,” Government Accountability Office Comptroller General David Walker told senators Thursday, just five days before the sixth anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. In a 320-page report, the GAO identified 171 performance expectations and found the department achieved fewer than half since it formed four years ago. Experts, including auditors, have said it would take a department this large five years to seven years to come together.

Auditors also noted that the Defense Department, created after World War II, still faces serious management challenges. “I'm confident DHS can do better faster,” Walker said.

Homeland Security officials disagreed with many of the findings, which they said were based on vague and shifting criteria.

“The department continues to believe that they used a flawed methodology in preparing its report,” said Paul A. Schneider, the undersecretary for management.

Schneider said the measurements do not account for programs that never were expected to be completed in four years, such as a border security initiative. The department has deployed 6,000 National Guard members to the border and has hired more than 5,000 additional border patrol agents since 2001.

Auditors found maritime security to be the only area where the department made significant progress. Walker attributed this to strong congressional oversight and increased funding.

Auditors found DHS has not made adequate progress in these areas:

Identifying the spots where people illegally cross the border into the country.

Removing criminal aliens and establishing a strategy to prevent human smuggling.

Setting standards and procedures for securing the outer perimeter of airports.

Issuing standards for securing non-aviation transportation.

Establishing a single, all-hazards plan to respond to disasters.

Coordinating research and development of countermeasures for chemical, biological, nuclear and other terrorist threats.

During congressional testimony Wednesday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff defended the department's progress.

“But if you ask me is the job of keeping us safe done, the answer to that is no,” Chertoff said. “It is not done. And it may not be done within our lifetimes.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; chertoff; gao; homelandsecurity; immigration

1 posted on 09/06/2007 5:26:36 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

who the hell needs enemies when these folks are “at the switch” ??????


2 posted on 09/06/2007 5:30:29 PM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor
Oh but sure it has made progress! Forget our heritage! Forget COURAGE! Don't buy a weapon for fighting enemies foreign and domestic! ...and if you do, be sure to keep the ammo locked in a box in the far end of the house, while the weapon stays firmly trigger locked for the children of course.

DO buy lots of duct tape and PVC sheeting and practice kissing our cowardly asses goodbye!

Friggin useless DHS. They're (as we say here on the farm) like tits on a boar hog....USELESS.
3 posted on 09/06/2007 5:33:42 PM PDT by hiredhand (My kitty disappeared. NOT the rifle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Priority #1 = Secure our borders!
4 posted on 09/06/2007 5:34:23 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand
Friggin useless DHS. They're (as we say here on the farm) like tits on a boar hog....USELESS.

Well said...kinda. :-)

5 posted on 09/06/2007 5:35:15 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

then repeat rule #1


6 posted on 09/06/2007 5:35:39 PM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor
Yes, but Chertoff is working hard to give amnesty to illegal criminal aliens. You can’t expect him to do everything, first things first.
7 posted on 09/06/2007 5:36:26 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

By what sstandards? I would like to point out that there hasn’t been another attack......


8 posted on 09/06/2007 5:37:20 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

Surely no one could criticize the skill and professionalism of the TSA. How many elderly women, wheelchair users, and four-year-olds have hijacked airliners since 9-11? ZERO. The nail-clipper and water-bottle ban is working! Kudos, Homeland Security!


9 posted on 09/06/2007 5:39:31 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

Based on what I see at the airports with TSA I’d say the report is on target.


10 posted on 09/06/2007 5:39:59 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

Most of the time, the press inserts the statement that the GAO is “non-partisan”.

It IS partisan, and this report is an example.

Remember earlier this week when they were highly critical of progress in Iraq?

The were giving either A+ or F’s, in their analysis. If a program had reached 90%, it failed because it had not completely reached every goals. No credit was given for being close to achieving it’s targets.

We should read GAO as “Highly Partisan” in it’s analysis.


11 posted on 09/06/2007 5:41:32 PM PDT by Rhetorical pi2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
By what sstandards? I would like to point out that there hasn’t been another attack......

That's due, no doubt, to the progress we have made overseas. Domestically, the DHS has met fewer than half its goals. That's a sad fact, and one that leads me to believe they have failed miserably.

But I reaspect your opinion and thank you for sharing it.

12 posted on 09/06/2007 5:44:19 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor
That's been our STANDARD answer to the GOP for everything they've sent...e-mail, phone calls, and letters....for FOUR years now.

Did they listen? Well...sort of. We flooded switchboards, e-mail servers, and ran fax machines out of paper in D.C. at legislators offices when they tried passing Shamnesty.

But a day later, the CINC got on T.V. and issued a scathing rebuttal at us. Hmmmm....there's definitely something wrong with this scene! We voted him in because we "thought" we were philosophically aligned. Even after turning the issue the other way with our persistance, the best he can muster is criticism against us because we don't know what's good for us?

So I figured he'd get over it, and thought that he would until he went to Harry Reid to revive the cursed issue. So we had a "rematch" and shot it down again.

At that point the GOP SPLIT. I don't think they've realized it yet. I think they're going to get trounced in 2008 like they did in the last congressional elections, and they won't even see it coming. After Shamnesty, why should we hope for any less?

They've got no reason to secure the borders. It's simply too profitable to keep them open.

Too many fat American people live in too many cul-de-sacs, and pay the cable bill, and surf porn, and pretend to be "concerned" voters, but really aren't willing to give up anything to see the nation change for the better. We're going to get what we "deserve", and I for one am sooooo not looking forward to it.
13 posted on 09/06/2007 5:44:22 PM PDT by hiredhand (My kitty disappeared. NOT the rifle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

My sincerest appolgies. I could have at least used non slang, and correct spelling.


14 posted on 09/06/2007 5:46:37 PM PDT by hiredhand (My kitty disappeared. NOT the rifle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Last time my wife and I flew she was scrutinized extensively. Embarrassingly, if you know what I mean. Nevermind that she’s a 5’3”, 57-year-old kindergarten schoolteacher. They allowed my 6’8 frame (beard and all)right through without a second glance. I thought that interesting.


15 posted on 09/06/2007 5:47:09 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

Why is so much stock given to Congressional audit reports?


16 posted on 09/06/2007 6:03:49 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Why is so much stock given to Congressional audit reports?

Really, I agree. They're not telling us anything that anyone can't see. DHS is a dysfunctional illegal alien welcome wagon.

17 posted on 09/06/2007 6:15:54 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor
...absence of a terrorist attack on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001

Huh? No attacks since 9/11? They didn't hear about the shoot 'em ups at LAX in '05, Seattle in '06, Salt Lake City in '07, SUV mayhem at Chapel Hill last year and again this year in San Fran....

Absence of attacks my foot.

18 posted on 09/06/2007 6:42:21 PM PDT by absalom01 (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor

Something tells me that this “Hit Piece” is in anticipation of us being hit again. Possibly on 9-11’s anniversary.


19 posted on 09/06/2007 7:05:13 PM PDT by Delmarksman (Pro 2A Anglican American (Ford and Chevy kill more people than guns do, lets ban them))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson