Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP hopefuls clash with Paul over Iraq
AP on Yahoo ^ | 9/5/07 | Libby Quaid - ap

Posted on 09/05/2007 7:55:33 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

DURHAM, N.H. - Republican presidential contenders voiced support for the Iraq war Wednesday night despite a warning from anti-war candidate Ron Paul that they risk dragging the party down to defeat in 2008.

"Even if we lose elections, we should not lose our honor," shot back former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, "and that is more important to the Republican Party."

Huckabee was in the majority, Paul very much in the minority on the debate stage when it came to the war, a politically unpopular conflict that has emerged as the dominant issue of the 2008 race for the presidency.

The issue flared near the end of a 90-minute encounter in which all eight men on stage welcomed former Sen. Fred Thompson to the race with barbed humor and pointed advice.

"This is a nomination you have to earn," said former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani. "Nobody's going to give it to you. Nobody's going to grant it to you."

The debate unfolded several days before Gen. David Petraeus is scheduled to deliver an assessment of President Bush's decision to commit 30,000 additional combat troops to give the Iraqi government time to develop.

Sen. John McCain, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Giuliani were among those who stressed their support for the war, at times even competing to show their commitment.

"The surge is apparently working," said Romney, referring to the increase in troops.

That brought an instant rebuke from McCain, who said, "The surge is working, sir, no, not apparently. It's working."

The debate ranged over familiar issues, and each of the men on stage looked for moments to appeal to their target constituents.

Huckabee, eager to win the support of social conservatives, said he supports a "human life amendment" to outlaw abortion.

By contrast, Giuliani supports abortion rights and Romney favors allowing states to decide on their own whether to permit or ban them.

Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas and Rep. Duncan Hunter of California called for the resignation of Sen. Larry Craig, the Idaho Republican who pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in an airport men's room in an undercover police operation.

"It's important that the party stand for family values," said Brownback, although as recently as last week, he pointedly avoided recommending that Craig step down.

Brownback also drew boos from the audience when he called for passage of a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. "I understand there is a divided audience," he said.

Giuliani responded to questions about his personal life by saying he is human and faces problems that are not uncommon to many Americans.

"I am not running as a perfect candidate for president of the United States. I'm running as a human being who has been very successful as a leader," he said. "So obviously, any issues in my private life do not affect my public performance.

His daughter has indicated support for Democrat Barack Obama, and his son has said he didn't speak to his father for some time. Giuliani and their mother, Donna Hanover, had a nasty and public divorce while Giuliani was New York's mayor, and he has since remarried.

The debate took place on a stage at the University of New Hampshire, roughly four months before the state holds the first primary of the 2008 race.

Thompson clearly hoped to upstage the event — scheduling an appearance on Jay Leno for later in the evening, and airing the first television commercial of his campaign on Fox, whoich was airing the debate.

He was not disappointed. Brit Hume, the debate moderator, opened up by asking each of the eight candidates to respond to the newcomer.

"I was scheduled to be on Jay Leno tonight, but I gave up my spot to somebody else because I'd rather be here in New Hampshire," joked Huckabee.

"Why the hurry? Why not take some more time off?" Romney said humorously.

The debate ranged over familiar issues, and each of the men on stage looked for moments to appeal to their target constituents.

Huckabee, eager to win the support of social conservatives, said he supports a "human life amendment" to outlaw abortion.

By contrast, Giuliani supports abortion rights and Romney favors allowing states to decide on their own whether to permit or ban them.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clash; gop; hopefuls; iraq; ronpaul

1 posted on 09/05/2007 7:55:35 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Anybody bother to ask “Mr Consitutionalist” Paul to defend his stands in favor of Congressional Earmarks? Or his $400 million in pork he has earmarked?


2 posted on 09/05/2007 8:03:02 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Hello village , we found your idiot !!!
RP is a naive isolationist with no attachment to REALITY.
“AMERICA HAS NO NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE ARABIC PENSULIA..
WHAT A FOOL !!!!
3 posted on 09/05/2007 8:21:16 PM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Is that all you have? Earmarks? Compare that to that the corruption and blatent lies that other candidates spout forth. The unconstitutional garbage that McCain, Giuliani, Romney and the other psuedo Republicans try to shove down our throats.

I realize that RP doesn't have a chance in hell of getting in the whitehouse, but give me break on this earmark non issue.

4 posted on 09/05/2007 8:39:17 PM PDT by mazza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mazza
It's a convenient strawman for them. Due to new legislative requirements, that Ron Paul supported, spending bills have to be "Earmarked" so there is no "hidden" spending. EVERY Rep has their own earmarks. It's part of procedure. Ron Paul is no different as is REQUIRED. However, Dr. Paul voted AGAINST the over all spending bill as it is bloated, out of control, and completely imbecilic.

We DO have a vested interest in destroying utterly those who dare attacks us. So why are we trying to build a "democracy" in the middle of those who hate us? Why aren't we just smashing them left and right until they stop trying to kill us or have no one left to attack us with?

Maybe the RINO cheerleaders here just love us trying to fight their little "war" with law enforcement rules of engagement. Not a good way to "win" a war. The RINO's want us to "win" this version of Viet Nam using their same rules, while folks like Ron Paul want us to "win" like we did WWII.

5 posted on 09/05/2007 8:48:33 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"It's important that the party stand for family values"

And remember, "family values don't stop at the Rio Grande."

Welcome to the Republican Family Values World Worker's Party!

6 posted on 09/05/2007 8:56:42 PM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Johnnie, you’ve been handed your ass over this stupid lame talking point it’s not even funny.


7 posted on 09/05/2007 8:58:42 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Ron could have "won" that little engagement with Huckabee in tonights little pony show if he would have simply pointed out that Huckster's "Ein Volk" crap doesn't wash very well these days.

Yes... we are One Nation. This doesn't mean we need to kowtow to fascism. And yes, this is exactly what Huckster came across as.

Paul came across as defensive, hesitant, and ineffectual. He's got great ideas, overall, but is not what we need for POTUS.

8 posted on 09/05/2007 9:11:12 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I'll try to get this quote as accurately as I can remember it, but Paul clearly showed he has gone totally nuts when he said, referring to the War on Terror, "It's a violation of international law. And that is where I get my marching orders."

Mr. Constitutionalist, my butt. Reminds me of Specter defering to Scottish law during the impeachment vote. Or Sandra Day O'Connor deferring to international law and opinion in a Supreme Court opinion.

9 posted on 09/05/2007 9:14:14 PM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
America is in serious trouble..
When Americans can look at the pitiful collection of clowns seeking the Presidency from both parties -— and not cringe in horror, something is wrong...

Then to hear that McCain is “gaining”, due to the perception he is some military genius or a man of honor, or to watch that deer caught in the spotlight - Ron Paul - mimicking a surrendering prey animal whining and sputtering was disconcerting to say the least.

At this point, I don’t have a dog in the fight..
Still hoping that one of them will justify another trip to the ballot box....
Looks like I’ll have to hold my nose again and vote for the lesser evil...

10 posted on 09/05/2007 10:27:24 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Separated at Birth.

11 posted on 09/05/2007 10:31:28 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
He’s going down in flames.

As long as he could hide in the background he was OK. Once pushed into the spotlight and questioned, his views unravel since they are absurd and only “sound good”.

It’s pretty bad when you have to deny Iran is involved in Iraq to save face and justify your stance Ron.

12 posted on 09/05/2007 10:39:08 PM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Ron Paul on Hannity and Combs after the debate, this is pretty good:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn2JTi1U59k&NR=1


13 posted on 09/05/2007 11:28:58 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson