Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blowing the whistle on Big Labor (Michelle Malkin's Labor Day update on Unions' corruption, decline)
MichelleMalkin.com ^ | September 3, 2007 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 09/03/2007 9:51:56 AM PDT by Stoat

Blowing the whistle on Big Labor

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 3, 2007 01:30 AM
 Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

The Center for Union Facts is marking Labor Day by reminding Americans of union fatcats and the corruption of Big Labor. The state of the unions is…not good:

* Union membership is down to 7.4 percent of private sector employees and down to 12 percent overall (government employees are highly unionized, at a rate of 36.2 percent) – that’s down from a high of 20.1 percent in 1983

* Union bosses continue to be criticized for their lavish salaries, even while their membership declines

* Even after several major unions split from the AFL-CIO to improve their growth, some have found little success

Things are so bad with one carpenters’ union that it outsourced picketing duties to homeless people.

As I noted a few days ago, Big Labor is busying itself these days suing the government to protect illegal alien workers instead of American workers, lobbying for amnesty, and working to undermine employer sanctions for businesses that hire illegal immigrants.

In NYC, the traditional Labor Day parade has been cancelled amid massive corruption charges leveled against the head of the parade’s organizing union. The NYPost editorial board notes the symbolism:

The parade sputtered out entirely for most of the ’70s due to sparse attend- ance, and hasn’t even been held on Labor Day for the past decade.

Then again, this hasn’t exactly been a stellar year for the sponsoring organization, the Central Labor Council: Its former head, Brian McLaughlin, is under indictment for racketeering, embezzlement and fraud, to the tune of $2.2 million.

As U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia said in announcing the indictment - which includes 44 counts and runs to 186 pages (here’s the PDF): McLaughlin’s alleged larceny “lends new meaning to the term ‘hand in the till.’ ”

Besides which, the fact remains that the only real growth in the American labor movement - especially in New York - has been in the public sector: Government workers whose power derives from their unions’ ability to shake down elected officials, particularly during an election year.

The labor movement, in other words, really doesn’t have all that much to celebrate. We can’t think of any other reason why the CLC would voluntarily give up an opportunity for politicians to show up and display their fealty to organized labor.

Other than the likelihood that no one would have shown up to watch it.

On the Left, E.J. Dionne marvels: “At a moment of organizational weakness, labor’s political influence and ideological appeal may be as strong as at any time since the New Deal. Every Democrat running for president seems to know this.”

Shrinking numbers, growing Beltway power. Only a movement sustained by forced dues and an expansive political agenda far beyond its core mission could make that formula work.

NRO editors look at The Union Party:

Notwithstanding their professed interest in oversight and accountability, the House Democrats passed a Department of Labor appropriations bill this summer that cut $2 million from the budget for the Office of Labor and Management Standards, which oversees how unions spend dues money. During the Bush administration, this office has finally gotten unions to start complying with decades-old laws requiring itemized disclosure of their spending and their officers’ conflicts of interest. No wonder union leaders don’t want it funded.

More and more, union leaders are also putting their organizations on the record on issues unrelated to labor or collective bargaining. The National Education Association spends less than 15 percent of its dues money representing members in the workplace, according to disclosure forms filed with the Department of Labor. It gives its leftover millions to groups that do such things as resist Social Security reform and litigate to prevent restrictions on abortion. It has also declared its support for a government-controlled and taxpayer-funded health-care system. Other unions advocate such causes as same-sex marriage, higher taxes (which their workers would have to pay), retreat from Iraq, and an amnesty for illegal immigrants that would adversely affect the wage growth of many union members.

In ages past, when the worker’s lot was much worse than it is today, union leaders stuck to what they did best: collective bargaining and improvement of work conditions. They fought for the well-being of their workers, but frequently opposed government intervention in the workplace, understanding that a free market would create jobs and opportunities for all. Today’s labor leaders simply fight to preserve their power, often at the expense of both the workers they represent and the country as a whole. Unfortunately, their closest political friends hold a majority in Congress.

And check out the NLPC’s union corruption update newsletter for another reminder of labor leaders lining their pockets at workers’ expense.

Happy Labor Day!

***

One issue where a labor organization has taken the right side: those Mexican trucks that will start chugging across the southern border beginning on Sept. 6. The Teamsters and others tried to block the Bush plan via an emergency petition. The 9th Circuit handed a win to the open borders mob on this one:

The Bush administration can proceed with a plan to open the U.S. border to long haul Mexican trucks as early as next week after an appeals court rejected a bid by labor, consumer and environmental interests to block the initiative.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco late on Friday denied an emergency petition sought by the Teamsters union, the Sierra Club and consumer group Public Citizen to halt the start of a one-year pilot program that was approved by Congress after years of legal and political wrangling.

The Transportation Department welcomed the decision and said in a statement that allowing more direct shipments from Mexico will benefit U.S. consumers. The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement approved broader access for ground shipments from both countries but the Clinton administration never complied with the trucking provision. A special tribunal ordered the Bush administration to do so in 2001.

“This is the wrong decision for working men and women,” Jim Hoffa, president of the Teamsters, said in a statement after the court ruling. “We believe this program clearly breaks the law.” The Teamsters represents truckers that would be affected by the change. The emergency stay was sought on grounds the administration’s pilot program had not satisfied the U.S. Congress’ requirements on safety and other issues. But the appeals court ruled otherwise.

Hey, like Mexican President Felipe Calderon says: “Mexico does not end at its borders.”



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: labor; laborday; labordayteamsters; malkin; michellemalkin; teamsters; union; unions; unionthugs

 


1 posted on 09/03/2007 9:52:00 AM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat
OK -- I can understand (though obviously don't buy) the phony argument that greedy, evil capitalist private employers exploit their workers for obscene profits, thus requiring unions to protect these poor helpless employees.

But what on earth is the justification of unions for government employees? Seems to me it should be against the law for government employees to unionize, and that therefore all government employee unions should be immediately decertified and disbanded.

Since it is a well established fact that the government is completely benign and totally dedicated to the welfare of the people, how can it be seen as an exploiter of its workers, and why on earth would they need protection when there are no greedy private capitalist pigs to do the exploiting?

Hmmm?

2 posted on 09/03/2007 10:02:07 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Hmmm?
 

You've outlined another entry in the seemingly endless litany of Hypocrisies Of The Left.

The short answer, of course, is "because there's money to be made" in Government unions.

3 posted on 09/03/2007 10:12:49 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Bump


4 posted on 09/03/2007 10:26:34 AM PDT by Loud Mime (The Democrats next target for "resignation" is General David Petraeus! Air America started 8-28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
OK -- I can understand (though obviously don't buy) the phony argument that greedy, evil capitalist private employers exploit their workers for obscene profits, thus requiring unions to protect these poor helpless employees.

At one time in this country unions were necessary in order for workers to get a fair deal from their employers. Read a little history. It was big business who set up the country for the rise of Unions. Now, state and federal labor laws take the place of most Union protection without the dues paying and corruption of Union bosses. Make no mistake however, without Unions the labor laws we have for protection today would not have been possible without the existance of Unions.

I will agree with you about fed and state employess not ever needing unions but not about the private sector, as I said, in the past Unions were very necessary and needed due to the sh**ty treatment business, on the whole, gave their employees, believe it or not, it is part of history and easily checked.

5 posted on 09/03/2007 11:02:24 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Earlier this year, I read a great book about “The Education of Ronald Reagan” which talks about his years working the “rubber chicken circuit” as PR spokesman for GE during the 1950’s and early 1960’s. One of the primary reasons GE brought Reagan into this position was to help in their periodic union elections and negotiations — at the same time, he was sharpening his stump speech promoting free market capitalism and opposing collectivism and its many permutations.

It struck me that not only was Reagan instrumental in winning the Cold War with almost no help from the liberals/Democrats in Congress, he also was instrumental in shrinking the membership and influence of organized labor as well. Two of the great threats to American society defeated by President Reagan! What a legacy.


6 posted on 09/03/2007 11:10:27 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("You ask, 'What is our aim?' I can answer in one word: VICTORY - victory - at all costs...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Read a little history. It was big business who set up the country for the rise of Unions.

One book I found particularly helpful in understanding big business' role in the rise of unions was A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America 1870-1920 by Michael McGerr.

It is clear that life was appalling and brutal for many workers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as McGerr points out in horrifying detail.

Of course, it was only after the Civil War that America had created so much prosperity that people began to notice how crappy work conditions were. It was during this era when the concept of "leisure time" was first considered a possibility.

When you have to build industry with mule power and brute strength, it is going to be a nasty business, no argument. You try blasting through a mountain to lay railroad track with only human labor and horse power without having much danger, death and casualties.

Funny though, even today Stalin is still lauded for having dragged the Soviet Union into the 20th century, thereby mitigating his crimes for way to many intellectuals.

If only they would afford the same slack to the far more humane (by Stalin's standards) practices of the so-called Robber Barons.

But I do take your point, and don't really have a problem with collective bargaining for workers in such conditions.

Problem is, that was then, and this is now. So today we have unions dying in the private sector, and by far the largest membership is in the government sector.

That tells me that unions have served whatever purpose they may have once had, but have long since outlived their usefulness.

7 posted on 09/03/2007 11:35:09 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

try explaining malkin’s insight to joe sixpack down at the union local watering hole....

good luck with all that....


8 posted on 09/03/2007 11:56:45 AM PDT by stillwaiting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
The short answer, of course, is "because there's money to be made" in Government unions.

In my experience as a government employee I found that malcontents would become union stewards and to get them off the backs of management they would get promoted to supervisors. It was the backdoor method to becoming a supervisor because if it was based on merit alone they would never have made it.

9 posted on 09/03/2007 12:16:04 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
Two of the great threats to American society defeated by President Reagan! What a legacy.

Sounds like a great book.  And he did all that he did while being a good, honorable, likable man who was beloved by the people, another thing that the Left simply cannot stand.  Their heroes tend to be America-hating criminals and opportunists who are about as likable as a rabid snake.

10 posted on 09/03/2007 12:26:46 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
In my experience as a government employee I found that malcontents would become union stewards and to get them off the backs of management they would get promoted to supervisors. It was the backdoor method to becoming a supervisor because if it was based on merit alone they would never have made it.

Your experiences mirror mine.  The union stewards and activists in my experience have been the least capable employees.  They were always loud, but that was all.

11 posted on 09/03/2007 12:29:36 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stillwaiting
try explaining malkin’s insight to joe sixpack down at the union local watering hole....

good luck with all that....

I would suggest that Malkin's cited figures indicate a positive trend, albeit a slow one.  With the combination of the information explosion where ordinary people have access to vast amounts of data that would have taken considerable research to amass in years past coupled with the sad track record of Unions that has been apparent for generations, normal working folks are gradually freeing themselves from the mandated, jackbooted lockstep that so many were immersed in prior to the blossoming of the internet and alternative media. 

With the easy availability of honest facts and figures, the old adage "the truth will set you free" is slowly taking it's toll on the union thugs' stranglehold of the public.

12 posted on 09/03/2007 12:38:59 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
The union stewards and activists in my experience have been the least capable employees. They were always loud, but that was all.

Another thing that was quite obvious was that they always seemed to dress sloppy and not shave. I believe that this was a slam on management who had to sit down with them to adjudicate issues.

13 posted on 09/03/2007 12:44:23 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
Another thing that was quite obvious was that they always seemed to dress sloppy and not shave.

LMAO! 

I believe that this was a slam on management who had to sit down with them to adjudicate issues.

You're probably right, and it may also have been a response to their feeling (oftentimes entirely justified) that they simply could not be fired for anything short of murdering another employee.  Being constantly in the position of fighting for the least amount of work for the maximum amount of pay, they have a very clear idea of precisely what they can get away with, and many push it to the absolute limits in all areas of their own employment as well as those of others.

Perhaps an overall scruffiness that so very many on the Left embrace is a statement of solidarity with their vision of manual laborers....an attempt at "street cred" to use the modern ugly and inarticulate parlance.

14 posted on 09/03/2007 12:53:58 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Seems to me it should be against the law for government employees to unionize,

It was until fairly recently, maybe 10 to 20 years ago. I don't remember which pres or judge changed that.

15 posted on 09/03/2007 12:57:22 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
But what on earth is the justification of unions for government employees?

From what I remember, at the Federal level, JFK made it all but mandatory - more default Dem voters.

16 posted on 09/03/2007 1:03:48 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I would HIGHLY recommend that book... Many lessons for conservatives today, especially the need for “educating the people” in advance of the election cycle. Reagan spent 25 years honing his message and philosophy in adnvance of his run for the presidency. By the time he got there, he not only had honed his message to perfection, he had already “prepared the ground” for the battle he would wage. The people were ready for an optimistic, right-thinking leader... I think the majority of America remains that way today. I hope someone will pick up that mantle and run with it.


17 posted on 09/03/2007 1:09:04 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("You ask, 'What is our aim?' I can answer in one word: VICTORY - victory - at all costs...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
But what on earth is the justification of unions for government employees? Seems to me it should be against the law for government employees to unionize, and that therefore all government employee unions should be immediately decertified and disbanded.

Exactly right.

The gov't has NO competition, hence they cannot "go out of business" like a private sector company might who goes overboard catering to union demands. So the government can promise their union members anything and we taxpayers are stuck with the bill. It's ridiculous.

Unions whine about jobs being outsourced, but the major culprit to jobs leaving this country is the labor unions themselves. Like all socialist endeavors, the Unions gradually built up a false economic situation. An economic house of cards. It did this by paying unskilled workers huge salaries/benefits way beyond their real-world market value worth for the last 70+ years. This made the cost of goods and services skyrocket. Now that there is a world-wide economy, the "waterline" is seeking it's natural level. We are now having to pay the piper for artificially high wages to those who never should have got them.

18 posted on 09/03/2007 1:16:35 PM PDT by Zman516 (socialists & muslims -- satan's useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

of course.. otherwise the teamsters would have been at the mexican border stopping the trucks physically.


19 posted on 09/03/2007 1:17:37 PM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END WELFARE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Good dialog!


20 posted on 09/03/2007 2:15:59 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson