Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

LA Times (left coast Slimes) disturbed and dissapointed by Clinton camp, but the cover up is easily explained and just needs a heavier coat of White Water ... Silly me, that would be White Wash.
1 posted on 09/01/2007 7:39:29 AM PDT by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: nutmeg

bookmark


42 posted on 09/01/2007 8:41:07 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
LOOK... it's TouristSenator!!!
It shows up in more places than TouristGuy,
only with less style and substance...
she's Vaporware, just an empty crusty.
(Please spread me around like the parasite that i am...)
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

43 posted on 09/01/2007 8:42:05 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike
“How did Democratic presidential front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign fail to see the red flags in Hsu’s contributions?”

The red flags were probably all lost in the sea of red flags that already surround this group.

44 posted on 09/01/2007 8:42:48 AM PDT by monkeycard (There is no such thing as too much ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

The Clintonistas claimed that they “missed the vett” with Peter Paul and didn’t know about the Cuban Coffee Caper. That’s interesting. He had already been vetted by the Secret Service about six times for meetings with Nixon, Carter, Ford, Reagan and others.


45 posted on 09/01/2007 8:44:52 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

When a campaign has attracted more than 500,000 donors, as Clinton’s has, there is no way a candidate’s staff can check out each contributor.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You don’t check out guys giving twenty bucks. You do check out big donors.


46 posted on 09/01/2007 8:45:53 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Question for any/all...

Like with the Larry Craig PAC monies being unloaded as fast as it can, I see reports that the Hildebeast is ‘giving the (Hsu) contributions to charity’ as though that makes it all better (and makes it just go away).

Do they then get to write off this ‘charitable contribution’?

Shouldn’t they be forced to hand the dirty money back to the contributer (with appropriate paparazzi memorializing the event?!)


49 posted on 09/01/2007 8:52:08 AM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

How in the world did California allow this guy Hsu to elude justice for 15 frickin’ years? To me, that is a big part of the story.


52 posted on 09/01/2007 8:59:33 AM PDT by khnyny (The best minds are not in government. If they were, business would hire them away. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike
When a campaign has attracted more than 500,000 donors, as Clinton's has, there is no way a candidate's staff can check out each contributor.

No, but how many of those donors give over $100,000? She should easily be able to check out the top 20. Obviously, she turned a blind eye. Try again, LASlimes.

54 posted on 09/01/2007 9:00:44 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

Goes to show that a Clinton presidency could not be trusted...could be easily infiltrated and influenced by the Communist Chinese.


55 posted on 09/01/2007 9:02:44 AM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

“When a campaign has attracted more than 500,000 donors, as Clinton’s has, there is no way a candidate’s staff can check out each contributor”

And we’re all sure the LA Slimes would give the same pass to any Republican in a similar situation.


62 posted on 09/01/2007 9:50:14 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

As we remember some of the folks involved in the Clinton funny money frolics, here is a quick sketch of Gene and Nora Lum who were among the first players:

http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/hillarys.htm


64 posted on 09/01/2007 10:04:19 AM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike
DO NOT MISS THIS THREAD REGARDING 27k FROM JAPANESE NATIONAL THAT HAS NEVER BEEN RETURNED. PLEASE SEND THIS NOTE TO NEWSROOMS.



URL: http://i9.tinypic.com/62qhkkl.jpg


65 posted on 09/01/2007 10:05:10 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
The Lospindoctorangeles Times asks,
How did Democratic presidential front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign fail to see the red flags in Hsu's contributions?
Our survey said -- Clinton and her campaign did know.
66 posted on 09/01/2007 10:51:00 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, August 29, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

BUMP


71 posted on 09/01/2007 1:58:18 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

.


74 posted on 09/01/2007 9:01:46 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....run, Fred, run. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike

“Obviously, we were all surprised by this news, and we have a procedure that we follow and upon verifying it, we returned his money,” Clinton said this week.”

No different from Bubba’s apology about Monica:

“I’m sorry” (I’m sorry I got caught).

I’ll try to un-do it and we can just go on from there, ok, ya know? Ya know? Ya know? Ya know? Ya know?


75 posted on 09/01/2007 10:00:16 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IrishMike; doug from upland; MurryMom
How could the senator's campaign have missed the red flags over Hsu?


76 posted on 09/01/2007 10:05:25 PM PDT by Libloather (That's just what I need - some two-bit, washed up, loser politician giving me weather forecasts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson