Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Judge Says Marriage Not Just Man, Woman--Ruling: Law Defining Marriage Invalid (MUST READ!)
WKMG Local 6 ^ | August 30, 2007

Posted on 08/30/2007 10:26:47 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

DES MOINES, Iowa -- A Polk County judge has struck down Iowa's law preserving marriage for only a man and a woman. He ordered the county recorder's office to issue marriage licenses to gay couples.

Six gay and lesbian couples went to court for the right to legally marry in Iowa.

Lamda Legal filed a lawsuit in 2005 on behalf of the couples in Iowa, saying they deserve equal protection under the law.

Des Moines laywer Dennis Johnson represented six gay couples who filed the lawsuit after they were denied marriage licenses, and he says Hanson's ruling is a moral victory for equal rights.

Judge Robert B. Hanson ruled that couples cannot be denied licenses to marry or marriage certificates or "in any other way be prevented from entering into civil marriage pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 595 by reason of the fact that both persons comprising such as couple are of the same sex."

The county is expected to appeal the ruling to the Iowa Supreme Court.

"Today's civil-rights ruling by Judge Robert Hanson is another step in what is expected to be a lengthy legal process. The prudent approach would be for the Legislature to await an expected appeal and subsequent ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court before taking any steps in reaction to this decision," said Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal in a statement.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 3branchesofgovt; activistcourts; culturewar; family; familylaw; gaymarriage; govtwatch; homosexualagenda; homosexualmarriage; iowa; judicialactivism; judicialtyranny; outofcontroljudges; robertbhanson; roberthanson; romneylegacy; shadowgovernment; society
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
THIS IS HUGE! Another state may allow "gay marriage" and strike down a DOMA.
1 posted on 08/30/2007 10:26:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m just starting to look at this - I think this is the relevent law

http://www.legis.state.ia.us/IACODE/1999SUPPLEMENT/595/

>>595.2 Gender—age.

1. Only a marriage between a male and a female is valid.

2. Additionally, a marriage between a male and a female is valid only if each is eighteen years of age or older. However, if either or both of the parties have not attained that age, the marriage may be valid under the circumstances prescribed in this section. <<


2 posted on 08/30/2007 10:31:07 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

INTREP


3 posted on 08/30/2007 10:38:36 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Another day; another activist judge.


4 posted on 08/30/2007 10:38:49 PM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-life/borders, understands Red China threat! http://www.gohunter08.com/Home.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
For years, Iowa Republicans controlled the state house and governors mansion. For years, they told Iowa conservatives that a marriage amendment wasn't needed and that Iowa's DOMA was all that we needed. While we conservatives knew better, party hacks parrotted the party line.

Democrats will be democrats. This defeat can be set at the feet of republicans.

Next time a Republican tells you a marriage amendment isn't necessary, you know they're a liar.
5 posted on 08/30/2007 10:43:03 PM PDT by Old_Mil (Rudy = Hillary, Fred = Dole, Romney = Kerry, McCain = Crazy. No Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: 2ndDivisionVet

another radical judge

how does ISSC lean?


7 posted on 08/30/2007 10:47:36 PM PDT by wardaddy (America.....the beginning of the end as we know it probably)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

“Pick your steps over these endless ruins: the enemy have sacked everything in the sanctuary. They roared where your Assemblies used to take place, they stuck their enemy emblems over the entrance, emblems we had never seen before.” (Ps.74:1-23).

“Axes deep in the wood, hacking at the panels, they battered them down with mallet and hatchet; then, God, setting fire to your sanctuary, they profanely razed the house of your name to the ground. Determined to destroy us once and for all, they burned down every shrine of God in the country.” (Ps.74:1-23).

“Deprived of signs, with no prophets left, who can say how long this will last? How much longer, God, is the oppressor to blaspheme? Is the enemy to insult your name forever? Why hold back your hand, why keep your right hand hidden? “

“Remember the enemy’s blasphemy, how frenzied people dare to insult your name. Respect the covenant! We can bear no more — every cave in the country is the scene of violence! Rise God, say something on your behalf, do not forget the madman’s day-long blaspheming...” (Ps.74:1-23).


8 posted on 08/30/2007 10:52:01 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I haven’t lived in Iowa since 2001. Any Iowans here?


9 posted on 08/30/2007 10:52:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Let me see now. In various circumstances, it is illegal to smoke in public although smoking is legal. It is illegal to have a gun(s)even though it is a right given to me by the 2nd amendment. It is illegal to be in public while intoxicated (@.08) but is legal to drink. At least if I am gay I can now marry, altho there are still some sodomy laws on the books, and the laws have only been strengthened re: prohibiting gay unions. Isn’t their something wrong with this scenario?


10 posted on 08/30/2007 10:56:26 PM PDT by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

based on what case law???


11 posted on 08/30/2007 10:57:29 PM PDT by txroadkill ( http://iraqstar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Any Iowans here?

Free Republic has some state specific boards. Check them out. Here's a list of people on FR claiming Iowa as a home location.

12 posted on 08/30/2007 10:59:52 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

used to go to Iowa city when I was a hippie.....a very long time ago


13 posted on 08/30/2007 11:00:04 PM PDT by wardaddy (America.....the beginning of the end as we know it probably)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Wow! I looked at those names and don’t recognize any of them. Maybe they post on other forums here? Wake up, Iowans!


14 posted on 08/30/2007 11:03:42 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

I think we need to do a better job of getting state ping lists in order.


15 posted on 08/30/2007 11:06:03 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
I think we need to do a better job of getting state ping lists in order.

That be true.

16 posted on 08/30/2007 11:07:23 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Do any Iowans hold a ping list?


17 posted on 08/30/2007 11:09:58 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Do you know who the freepers are who hold state ping lists? Are all states covered? I’m not referring to state boards, but actual ping lists.


18 posted on 08/30/2007 11:13:57 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I love how the liberals use the claim of precidence to get away with what they want to do, for instance Roe vs Wade. But if precidence goes against them it’s a so-what issue, ground-breaking don’t ya know.


19 posted on 08/30/2007 11:16:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; politicallyincarrect; /\XABN584; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; ...

** Action Alert ** WAKE-UP IOWA !!


20 posted on 08/30/2007 11:23:03 PM PDT by davidosborne (http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s-) to elect Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson