Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Getting Vietnam Right
The American Spectator ^ | Aug. 30, 2007 | Mark Moyar

Posted on 08/30/2007 8:26:30 AM PDT by Interesting Times

In the past week, the criticisms swirling around the President's VFW speech have provided much less insight into the President or the speech than into the critics. Rather than address the speech's central issue -- the 1975 debate over the ramifications of abandoning Vietnam -- these individuals have tried to push their own views on Iraq by mentioning other aspects of Vietnam. Emblematic of the attackers was Senator John Kerry, who said that the President's comparison of Vietnam with Iraq was "irresponsible" and "ignorant of the realities of both of those wars." Kerry explained that in Iraq, as in Vietnam, "more American soldiers are being sent to fight and die in a civil war we can't stop and an insurgency we can't bomb into submission." Senator Ted Kennedy, another opponent of both wars, backed this interpretation with the comment that the United States lost the Vietnam War because the South Vietnamese government "lacked sufficient legitimacy with its people."

Kerry and Kennedy missed key facts about Vietnam, some of them long obvious, others newly emerged from historical studies. The New York Times and NBC News and CNN and so on missed them, too, because they chose to rely on outdated historians or their own prejudices. The insurgency in Vietnam was dead by 1971, thanks to South Vietnam's armed forces, America's forces, and a South Vietnamese civilian population that overwhelmingly viewed the South Vietnamese government as legitimate. During 1972, after all American combat units had departed, South Vietnamese forces defeated a massive North Vietnamese invasion with the help of American air power. The so-called Christmas bombing of 1972 bombed North Vietnam into submission, resulting in a peace treaty. Had the antiwar Congress not slashed aid to South Vietnam and prohibited the use of American aircraft over Vietnamese skies...

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bloodbath; leftistmythology; markmoyar; vietnam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last
Mark Moyar, author of the Vietnam War history "Triumph Forsaken," has provided much of the scholarship behind the Bush Administration's new initiative to confront the mythical Vietnam of the Left, in which heroic antiwar protestors brought peace to Southeast Asia instead of unimaginable carnage.
1 posted on 08/30/2007 8:26:31 AM PDT by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; eddie willers; cajungirl; wirestripper; Southflanknorthpawsis; Peach; prairiebreeze; ...

I’m back.


2 posted on 08/30/2007 8:27:46 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
I don't think this is too far off-topic:

Click either image above.

"There were reeducation camps, and they weren't pretty and, you know, nobody likes that kind of outcome, but on the other hand I've met a lot of people today who were in those education camps, who are thriving in the Vietnam of today."
---- John Kerry, July 19, 2007, C-SPAN

Among his many, many flawed perceptions, John Kerry - known in the Vietnamese-American newspapers as "phan boi" (traitor) - must be completely oblivious of the many tens of thousands who died, were crippled by beatings, or became chronically ill in "reeducation camp."

* Grand Jury Prize - Amazonas International Film Festival, Brazil
* Winner, Best Feature Film - Anchorage International Film Festival
* Winner, Best Cinematography - Milano International Film Festival
* Winner, Long Nguyen, Best Actor - Newport Beach Film Festival
* Special Jury Prize - Newport Beach Film Festival
* Audience Award - San Francisco International Asian American Film Festival
* Grand Jury Prize - San Diego Asian Film Festival
* Jury Award - Asian Film Festival of Dallas
* Winner, Ham Tran, Best Director - Asian Festival of First Film
* Winner, Lam Nguyen, Best Producer – Asian Festival of First Film
* Audience Award - Toronto Reel Asian International Film Festival
* Special Project Award - The Princess Grace Foundation, USA
* Best Feature Film – Boulder International Film Festival
* Outstanding Independent Film - 2007 AZN Excellence Awards

3 posted on 08/30/2007 8:32:12 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Remove me from any and all of your ping lists.

Thanks


4 posted on 08/30/2007 8:32:25 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

correct spelling: Viet Nam


5 posted on 08/30/2007 8:35:46 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

The traitor John Kerry ought to shut his mouth - he was instrumental in snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in Vietnam.


6 posted on 08/30/2007 8:36:18 AM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

BTTT


7 posted on 08/30/2007 8:37:02 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Remove me from any and all of your ping lists.

Gladly.

8 posted on 08/30/2007 8:37:50 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Broker
correct spelling: Viet Nam

I think I'm going to have to go with Dr. Moyar's spelling over yours. Were you able to extract anything else from his article?

9 posted on 08/30/2007 8:39:10 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
More recent articles on the president's new Vietnam truth initiative can be found here.

10 posted on 08/30/2007 8:40:21 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

So this is the way you make your return to FR. Just remember, I never requested at any time to be placed on your ping list(s) and never would.


11 posted on 08/30/2007 8:48:32 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

The President may have had this author to the White House for a chat, as he did Mark Steyn and others.


12 posted on 08/30/2007 8:49:14 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Must see. Thanks for the links.


13 posted on 08/30/2007 8:51:25 AM PDT by colorcountry (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
So this is the way you make your return to FR. Just remember, I never requested at any time to be placed on your ping list(s) and never would.

By all means, continue whining. I can use the pings.

14 posted on 08/30/2007 8:58:40 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Whatever. I’ll be seeing you around FR.

Just remember, keep me off your ping lists.


15 posted on 08/30/2007 9:03:27 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
The President may have had this author to the White House for a chat, as he did Mark Steyn and others.

I wouldn't be at all surprised. It's great to see this talented young historian cutting through decades of myth and disinformation.

16 posted on 08/30/2007 9:03:53 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Ping.


17 posted on 08/30/2007 9:09:14 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

The usual cast of despicable characters. Kerry, Kennedy ...


18 posted on 08/30/2007 9:11:10 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: angkor
I don't think this is too far off-topic:

Not off-topic at all. Thanks...

19 posted on 08/30/2007 9:14:41 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Broker
You’re right, but the Vietnam anglicization makes it easier to discuss people and things Vietnamese.
20 posted on 08/30/2007 9:17:02 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

“The insurgency in Vietnam was dead by 1971, thanks to South Vietnam’s armed forces, America’s forces, and a South Vietnamese civilian population that overwhelmingly viewed the South Vietnamese government as legitimate.”

Incorrect. The VC were largely defunct by 71 due to their over reach and repulse by American forces during the Tet offensive and subsequent attacks. For the author of this piece to claim that South Vietnamese civilians were suddenly all for their government and thus played a role in the impotence of the VC is wrong.


21 posted on 08/30/2007 10:13:37 AM PDT by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Incorrect. The VC were largely defunct by 71 due to their over reach and repulse by American forces during the Tet offensive and subsequent attacks. For the author of this piece to claim that South Vietnamese civilians were suddenly all for their government and thus played a role in the impotence of the VC is wrong.

The premise of the massive '68 Tet uprising by the VC in all major cities of the South was that the people would join them against the government. That didn't happen, which allowed U.S. and S.V. forces to decimate them.

If Dr. Moyar says S.V. civilian support of the government was an important factor, you can take it to the bank. His research is meticulous.

22 posted on 08/30/2007 10:18:31 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
I’m back.

You were gone?

JK

Thanks for the ping, stick around ok?

23 posted on 08/30/2007 10:19:36 AM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Granted the Southern population didn’t cross over to the VC / NVA side. However, according to Ronald Spector’s “After Tet” as well as James Arnold’s “The Tet Offensive,” confidence and support in the govt collapsed as they witnessed their govt being unable to defend them without American help.


24 posted on 08/30/2007 11:03:09 AM PDT by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Broker
correct spelling: Viet Nam

You can always tell the people who want to control others. Somewhere inside you is a communist trying to get out.

Do you really think the majority of us on FR give a rat's butt whether Vietnam or Viet Nam is the correct spelling? We know what country he is talking about and that is what matters. I'll bet you are one of the myriad posting police also. Get a life.

25 posted on 08/30/2007 11:08:20 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

And yet the S.V. Army held up very well against the massive invasion of 1972, by which time we were down to a few thousand ground troops in country. U.S. air power made a big difference, of course.


26 posted on 08/30/2007 11:13:15 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
You were gone?

I took an extended break after the virulent FR purges this spring.

27 posted on 08/30/2007 11:14:17 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

The focus was on the support from the civilian populace, not the ARVN and its fighting abilities.

FR Spring purge?


28 posted on 08/30/2007 11:20:49 AM PDT by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
The focus was on the support from the civilian populace, not the ARVN and its fighting abilities.

Fair enough, although I think the two were probably intertwined.

FR Spring purge?

If you missed it, consider yourself lucky...

29 posted on 08/30/2007 11:23:15 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times; Reagan Man
"Remove me from any and all of your ping lists." - Reagan Man

I think this means I should be added to your ping list. If you please. Thanks.

30 posted on 08/30/2007 11:36:02 AM PDT by Designer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
"..cutting through decades of myth and disinformation."

Bump

31 posted on 08/30/2007 11:37:55 AM PDT by Designer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Thanks for the ping

Pray for W and Our Troops


32 posted on 08/30/2007 12:03:03 PM PDT by bray (Member of the FR President Bush underground fighting FR BDS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Designer
I think this means I should be added to your ping list. If you please. Thanks.

Done, and welcome.

33 posted on 08/30/2007 1:05:15 PM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

34 posted on 08/30/2007 1:30:12 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve; Interesting Times; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP; dixiechick2000
Thank you for the ping I.T.!


35 posted on 08/30/2007 5:11:29 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Kerry, Kennedy must have had a drunken pity party the day the Berlin Wall came down and latter had fits of depression while the USSR folded.
36 posted on 08/30/2007 6:37:17 PM PDT by oyez (Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Kerry, Kennedy must have had a drunken pity party the day the Berlin Wall came down and latter had fits of depression while the USSR folded.
37 posted on 08/30/2007 6:37:19 PM PDT by oyez (Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Kerry, Kennedy must have had a drunken pity party the day the Berlin Wall came down and latter had fits of depression while the USSR folded.
38 posted on 08/30/2007 6:37:25 PM PDT by oyez (Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Thanks for the ping!


39 posted on 08/30/2007 8:40:12 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Smooches.....

Leni

40 posted on 08/30/2007 8:51:42 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

“...because Vietnam is now a nice capitalist country.”

It is ridiculous to believe that Vietnam is now a nice capitalist country. If it’s capitalist, why does a person require two visa’s, one to enter the country one wishes to visit and one to be allowed to leave Vietnam?

Two percent of the population of Vietnam are well off; those two percent also comprise the Communist Party. The remaining 98% want out of Vietnam right now. They are sick of having all of their earnings and belongings sucked out of them for the benefit of the Party members. Those 98% CAN NOT leave - that is not capitalism!!!


41 posted on 08/30/2007 9:00:28 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Broker

“correct spelling: Viet Nam”

You are correct. The people of Viet Nam are the Viet people and Nam means South, hence Viet Nam. The northern area is properly referred to as Bac Viet, North Viet (people).


42 posted on 08/30/2007 9:05:12 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

“His research is meticulous.”

His use of the term “Vietnam” speaks to the contrary.


43 posted on 08/30/2007 9:09:01 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
Aloha GL!

“...because Vietnam is now a nice capitalist country.”

It's become a hybrid economy but the Lao Dong is the only party in town......just as it was in the 1954 elections in Bac Viet.

Even the Cong San know things change but not their control over political thought and its challenges to their rule.
44 posted on 08/30/2007 9:33:09 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: oyez

Yep.
Yep.
Yep.


45 posted on 08/31/2007 3:05:21 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Vietnam is a relatively new verb coined by the SDS in April 1968 and central to their “evil America” mission statement thereafter a Democrat platform item.


46 posted on 08/31/2007 4:09:52 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Welcome back, then, IT.


47 posted on 08/31/2007 4:12:25 AM PDT by Molly Pitcher (We are Americans...the sons and daughters of liberty...*.from FReeper the Real fifi*))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times; All
I was on a Big 10 campus in the late '60s and early 70s, and witnessed the whole mess of disgusting demonstrations, and the weak administration responses.

Then my husband and I were overseas, while he served in the Army, S. Korea.

We returned stateside in time to be in the audience at Tulane Un. when President Ford announced our presence in S. Vietnam was over..April '75.

Gosh my husband and I were the only people in the audience who didn't applaud that line.

Rather, we were disgusted & ashamed.

I'd already considered the idea that the war and its aftermath would have longterm consequences. That there was no escape, and that what I'd witnessed would reverberate thru decades to come.

I also vowed that likely I'd have a small role in setting the record straight. That has been true....my vote and work in the 04 election, for example.

IT, thanks for your dedication in this area, also.

This is my generation's burden, and we must see it thru & make amends.

48 posted on 08/31/2007 4:28:59 AM PDT by Molly Pitcher (We are Americans...the sons and daughters of liberty...*.from FReeper the Real fifi*))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
Welcome back, then, IT.

Thanks, Molly.

49 posted on 08/31/2007 6:10:03 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

It’s great to see you back! There must have been quite a few regular Freepers that were banned because Free Republic has been pretty boring this summer.

Great article, by the way.


50 posted on 08/31/2007 10:31:10 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson