Skip to comments.
Romney Vows to Increase Cancer Research
Wash. Post/AP ^
| August 28, 2007; 11:50 AM
| By RON FOURNIER
Posted on 08/28/2007 11:29:33 AM PDT by meandog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: BMIC
Romney's robots
21
posted on
08/28/2007 11:44:01 AM PDT
by
meandog
(Romney and Giuliani: Just like Bill Clinton, duplicitous draft-dodgers!)
To: meandog
Romney's a panderer
panderer - 1. One who caters to or exploits the lower tastes and desires of others.
It's as simple as him saying, "
I'll do this for you if you'll do this (vote) for me!"
22
posted on
08/28/2007 11:44:41 AM PDT
by
hiredhand
(My kitty disappeared. NOT the rifle!)
To: meandog
Get ready to empy your pockets fot the funding.
Wrong, as usual. There are billions and billions of dollars wasted by the federal government. The waste must stop and then there will be money left to give more tax breaks AND aid critical medical research.
23
posted on
08/28/2007 11:45:45 AM PDT
by
elizabetty
(The funding dried up and I can no longer afford Tagline Messages.)
To: Red Badger
Taxol? maybe thats where it got its name!.............TaxES feed cancer - namely, the malignant growth of government at all levels.
24
posted on
08/28/2007 11:45:46 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Chertoff needs to move out of DC, not move to Justice.)
To: elizabetty
Wrong, as usual. There are billions and billions of dollars wasted by the federal government. The waste must stop and then there will be money left to give more tax breaks AND aid critical medical research.How many decades have we been hearing that - that more spending is needed but it can be offset by cutting waste and corruption?
Instead, taxes and spending go up and the waste and corruption goes right up with them.
Face it - your guy is NO conservative. He will pander until there is no one left to pander to.
25
posted on
08/28/2007 11:47:29 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Chertoff needs to move out of DC, not move to Justice.)
To: Abathar
26
posted on
08/28/2007 11:48:11 AM PDT
by
Natchez Hawk
(What's so funny about the first, second, and fourth Amendments?)
To: meandog
Romulan!?!?
LOL, now that was funny.
To: meandog
No kidding! Every time I see a Rommey thread it’s titled with something else he is going to give away...
28
posted on
08/28/2007 11:49:20 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: meandog
Really?
What’s he going to cut to compensate?
29
posted on
08/28/2007 11:49:39 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: avacado
At least he didn't promise to cure cancer, like Senator Ben Cardin did in 2006.
Or did he?
30
posted on
08/28/2007 11:50:03 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
To: zeaal
This must be in response to the Lance Armstrong Debate on health issues on MSNBC. Did anyone catch it ... the dems were present and accounted for.
I seen this guy on Meet the Press and he's a totalitarian socialist. He wants to pass a law banning all smoking, then he'd start attacking the food we ate and demand everybody exercise. Probably like Winston Smith in front of the TV in 1984. Of course Mr Potatohead, aka "Big Russ Book 3" didn't bother to point out that in theory we live in a free society. People like Lance Armstrong are dangerous and should be responded to when they start talking about taking away our freedoms.
31
posted on
08/28/2007 11:50:52 AM PDT
by
jackieaxe
(The Drug War is Pork Barrel spending!)
To: meandog
Next, he’ll say he’s going to increase spending for public education.
To: elizabetty
then there will be money left to give more tax breaks AND aid critical medical researchProvide me the Constitutional grounds tax dollars should be used to 'aid' any research. This is a rational question expecting a rational answer
33
posted on
08/28/2007 11:51:36 AM PDT
by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: DesScorp
yes, my favorite was that “people like Christopher Reeve will get out of their wheelchairs and walk again.” I love that clip, reminds me of the Algore “I raised it, I hoed it, I harvested it!” clip about tobacco.
34
posted on
08/28/2007 11:54:04 AM PDT
by
Reagan79
(Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
To: BibChr
Really? Whats he going to cut to compensate?
Well if he cuts like George Bush and the Republican controlled Congress, he'll only grow the federal government 2-3 times inflation!
35
posted on
08/28/2007 11:55:18 AM PDT
by
jackieaxe
(The Drug War is Pork Barrel spending!)
To: billbears
(from the article): Romney opposes public-run health care systems like those in Canada and Britain. He helped Massachusetts enact a landmark health program that makes sure anybody who qualifies for Medicaid enrolls in the program, requires people who can afford health insurance to purchase it...Don't really see a diff between Mitt-care and Brit-care?
36
posted on
08/28/2007 11:59:57 AM PDT
by
meandog
(Romney and Giuliani: Just like Bill Clinton, duplicitous draft-dodgers!)
To: billbears
Provide me the Constitutional grounds tax dollars should be used to 'aid' any research. This is a rational question expecting a rational answerWell I don't agree that it means anything and everything but you know as well as I do that the phrase "...establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare.." has been twisted into all sorts of things the founders probably didn't anticipate. I only post this because you asked for a rational answer. Like I said, I don't necessarily agree that it means anything and everything but the phrase is somewhat...elastic.
37
posted on
08/28/2007 12:07:22 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: meandog
Cancer cures?? Promises, promises.....
...next he will be telling you, you can become a GOD!
38
posted on
08/28/2007 12:12:44 PM PDT
by
colorcountry
(Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire)
To: jackieaxe
I seen this guy on Meet the Press and he's a totalitarian socialist. Try googling "United Order," you'll find out why.
39
posted on
08/28/2007 12:15:44 PM PDT
by
colorcountry
(Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire)
To: meandog
This disappoints me to no end. It’s the first time I have seen Mitt open his mouth when he has no idea what he is talking about.
Cancer gets more funding than any other disease at NIH. Way more. Cardiovascular diseases are far and away the #1 killer, but the Natl Cancer Institute has a budget about 60% larger than the Natl Heart Lung and Blood Institute.
Breast cancer is not underfunded relative to other cancers. For ex it gets twice as much funding as the most common cancer than afflicts only men(prostate). I’m not saying that this is wrong; there are reasons to give more to breast cancer research (although the huge lobby for research dollars certainly is a factor). But to claim that breast cancer is not getting its fair share is simply absurd.
Of course, if you are going to increase funding of anything, you have to decrease funding of something else. Mitt needs to tell us what he will cut to pour more dollars where the need is doubtful.
A lot of people need to get over the idea that the solution to every problem is throwing more money at it.
40
posted on
08/28/2007 12:23:47 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop. -- P.J. O'Rourke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson