Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNA convicts neighbor of S.F. woman raped, killed 22 years ago
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 8/28/7 | Jaxon Van Derbeken

Posted on 08/28/2007 7:42:29 AM PDT by SmithL

Nearly 22 years after a woman was raped and stabbed to death in her Potrero Hill home, a San Francisco man who lived near the victim was convicted Monday of first-degree murder.

The only evidence against John Davis was the DNA left behind during the rape of Barbara Martz, 28. But that was enough for the jury of seven women and five men to convict Davis, 40, of murder in the commission of rape and burglary in connection with the slaying Dec. 4, 1985, in Martz's home on 25th Street. The panel deliberated more than four days before coming back with its verdict.

Because the jury found Davis guilty of the special circumstance of rape during commission of a murder, he will be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Prosecutors did not seek the death penalty, because of District Attorney Kamala Harris' opposition to capital punishment.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: antideathpenalty; dna; kamalaharris; sanfranciscovalues

John Davis was found guilty nearly 22 years after Barbara Ellis Martz was raped and stabbed to death in her Potrero Hill home.


1 posted on 08/28/2007 7:42:34 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

So, a district attorney’s PERSONAL views regarding the death penalty can prevent the death penalty, when the death penalty is not forbidden by law?


2 posted on 08/28/2007 7:46:13 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Another San Francisco value.


3 posted on 08/28/2007 7:51:13 AM PDT by SmithL (I don't do Barf Alerts, you're old enough to read and decide for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Yes, it’s called “prosecutorial discretion.”

The check on this is that the DA is (generally) an elected official, and if the local people don’t like his or her stance, they elect a different one.


4 posted on 08/28/2007 7:52:07 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
So, a district attorney’s PERSONAL views regarding the death penalty can prevent the death penalty, when the death penalty is not forbidden by law?

Yes because the DA is an elected local official and supposedly reflects the values of the local voters - which may or may not coincide with the values of the state as a whole. Just because state law allows the death penalty doesn't mean prosecutors have to seek it. That is a decision left entirely to them & they can use whatever reasoning they like to make the decision. They have to answer for it at election time.

5 posted on 08/28/2007 7:54:49 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This man is now forty and committed this crime when he was ... eighteen? And he’s been clean since? Hard to believe.


6 posted on 08/28/2007 7:55:14 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Clean?

Davis was already doing time for a string of crimes, including a 1993 robbery in San Francisco, when his DNA turned up in 2002 in a "cold hit" for the killing of Martz.

7 posted on 08/28/2007 7:59:29 AM PDT by SmithL (I don't do Barf Alerts, you're old enough to read and decide for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Luckily she didn’t have a gun, someone could have been hurt.


8 posted on 08/28/2007 8:06:27 AM PDT by Hacklehead (I'm not here to make friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

Damn straight.


9 posted on 08/28/2007 10:00:44 AM PDT by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
"... and if the local people don’t like his or her stance, they elect a different one."

And in SF, any DA who asks for the death penalty won't even make it to the next election.

10 posted on 08/29/2007 12:53:25 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

terrible crime, but i will grant you this...that is an excellent, spot on comment....


11 posted on 08/29/2007 1:36:00 AM PDT by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Liberals do such a wonderful job protecting society.


12 posted on 08/29/2007 1:37:36 AM PDT by BamaAndy (Heart & Iron; ISBN 1-4137-5397-3.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

Corrrect, and the nature of federalist democracy.

The way one part of the country dispenses justice is that part of the country’s business.

Now if we can only get SF from butting into the REST of the country’s business. . . . .


13 posted on 08/29/2007 7:30:12 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan; John Leland 1789
I live in Harris County TX. The county has accounted for between 15% and 20% of the total US death role executions in the US since it again became legal. The Prosecutor has to sign off an all case before they seek it.
14 posted on 08/29/2007 7:36:07 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
"Now if we can only get SF from butting into the REST of the country’s business."

And the rest of the world's business. Like Berkeley, Ann Arbor, Boulder, Austin and similar places, SF considers itself an autonomous entity, not subject to state and federal law, illegally performing homosexual "marriages," illegally shielding alien nationals, illegally continuing racially based hiring practices and so on. Their city councils also pass a ponderous number of foreign policy "resolutions," as though they were nations in their own right.

15 posted on 08/29/2007 11:10:32 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

and another wrongly convicted and picked upon young black male...


16 posted on 08/29/2007 11:13:57 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I am sure he has a whole bunch of attacks on his “resume”


17 posted on 08/29/2007 11:14:36 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BamaAndy

The only ones the libs are interested in protecting are unionists, collectivists, felons, miscreants, liars and practitioners of all sorts of perverse behavior.


18 posted on 08/29/2007 11:18:21 AM PDT by Pharmboy ("Liberals love humanity but hate people" Dick Armey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson