Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tomjohn77

For one, they were quite a bit taller on average, and slimmer (but weren’t we all). Their legs were generally longer in comparison to their torsos. Their facial features looked as much Spanish as Native American—i.e., sharper features and longer heads with a more pronounced jaw line, on average.

Now, they look more like my wonderful hairdresser from the years when I live in the NYC area. She was Guatemalan who had married a U.S. serivceman stationed there. She was very short and a bit stocky, with short limbs, and different features—more blunt features and a rounder head. She was very attractive and a nice, nice person. Her husband was a lucky guy. However, she didn’t look European at all, unlike Vicente Fox, or Calderon, for example.


17 posted on 09/02/2007 10:09:35 AM PDT by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: oceanagirl
more “Mexicans” today are more likely southern Mexico or central America and of a squattier gene pool

not as handsome either

18 posted on 09/02/2007 10:13:51 AM PDT by wardaddy (the future of the West is bleak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson