Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Detractors Need a Wake Up Call
AMERICAN CHRONICLE ^ | 17 AUGUST 2007 | Szandor Blestman

Posted on 08/17/2007 9:38:33 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

“That’s what you get for pretending the danger’s not real.

Meek and obedient , you follow the leader

down well trodden corridors, into the valley of steel.

What a surprise! A look of terminal shock in your eyes!

Now things are really what they seem. No, this is not a bad dream.”

Excerpt from the song Sheep by Pink Floyd

I’ve noticed a number of people on the Internet complaining about Ron Paul supporters recently. Many of them have the same complaint, that Ron Paul supporters are too pervasive. They call them Ron Paul spammers. They claim that a very few people are so dedicated to Ron Paul’s candidacy that they have skewed all the polls and made it appear as if Ron Paul has more support than he actually does by voting for him again and again. On Digg, they claim that there is a core of supporters that wait for a Ron Paul article to come out so they can Digg it and catapult it to the front page. If that were the case, they were taking time off when my articles came out.

These detractors need to think for a moment. I don’t know which candidates they support, but those candidates are getting support of very few people in the online community. One must wonder why some of these candidates don’t have that kind of support. One must wonder why Mitt Romney doesn’t have dozens of technologically savvy supporters going online to spam the polls or to create a buzz on Digg. One may wonder the same about John McCain or Rudy Giuliani supporters also, or the supporters of any of the other republican candidates. Could it be that the supporters of the other candidates simply aren’t as excited about their candidate as Ron Paul’s supporters are? Doesn’t it make you wonder why Ron Paul supporters are so excited? And I personally don’t think that it is in fact true that Ron Paul supporters are low in numbers and spamming the Internet. In fact, I think the number of Ron Paul supporters is growing day by day despite the fact that the Ron Paul detractors have tried to keep this from happening.

Another tactic some Ron Paul detractors use is name calling. They claim Ron Paul supporters are crazy. Since when is it crazy to speak out about someone you believe will make a difference, especially if that someone is doing something as important as running for president? Since when does following a dream make you crazy? They claim his supporters are on the fringe of society, that they are mostly 9/11 truthers and conspiracy theorists. Well, I don’t think that’s so true. I think a lot of everyday regular people are supporting Ron Paul. I’ve talked with a number of people who support Ron Paul and the subject of 9/11 or conspiracies hardly come up. And even if some of them are 9/11 truthers or conspiracy theorists, what’s wrong with wanting to know the truth? What’s wrong with asking questions, especially when those questions haven’t been answered satisfactorily? What’s wrong with not believing everything you see on the TV news? Do you believe everything the television news people tell you to believe? If you do, you might want to rethink that position and start getting information from other sources. There’s nothing wrong with comparing and contrasting different points of view to try to get a better understanding and a more complete picture of the world around you. They claim Ron Paul’s policies are too impractical, that he is too much of an idealist. Since when is being an idealist a bad thing? Isn’t that what our founding fathers were? Since when is it impractical to speak of freedom and liberty? Again, our founding fathers risked their very lives speaking out about such radical ideas. How long ago was it that the United States of America became a place where dreams died? When was it that spies were unleashed to see to it those same dreams could not be resurrected?

There’s something else Ron Paul detractors don’t seem to understand. Ron Paul supporters are supporting more than just Ron Paul, they are supporting ideas. Oh sure, Ron Paul is a very amicable person. Unlike most politicians, he answers questions straight on and doesn’t dodge them. He doesn’t try to answer in a way that everyone agrees with. He speaks his mind and it doesn’t matter to him if he loses votes doing so. He is that rarity of rarities, an honest politician. Perhaps that’s why they are so angry, because they know they support someone who is not honest. Perhaps that’s why Ron Paul’s supporters are so excited, because this is something they’ve never seen in their lives. But his honesty is not the idea I was talking about earlier, the idea is freedom. The idea is a smaller, less intrusive government. The idea is to give the people back control in their lives rather than having the government decide everything for them. It is the ideas of freedom and liberty that Ron Paul supporters are supporting. It is these ideas that have gotten them so excited.

The main stream media tries to ignore Ron Paul, as do the other candidates. Why do you suppose this is? He scores first in many online polls and still the media ignore him. His supporters generate a loud buzz and still the media ignores him. He came in fifth in a questionable Iowa straw poll and still the media ignores him. Today he came in third in the Illinois straw poll and the media will still probably try to ignore him. Why are they so afraid to report on him? Could it be because they don’t want his ideas to get out? Could it be because they’re afraid his ideas will resonate with the general public? Could it be that, for whatever reason, they’re trying to push someone on us that will somehow promote their interests? Perhaps the main stream media is just behind the times and really doesn’t realize what a phenomenon Ron Paul is becoming. I really don’t know, but I do know that Ron Paul is everywhere on the Internet and nowhere on the main stream media, with the exception of a couple of cutting edge shows. That simply seems strange to me.

Whatever reason one may decide to berate Ron Paul or his supporters, it might be helpful to step back and consider what you’re really against. Are you honestly just mad because there are so many articles out there praising Ron’s policies and his stances on the issues? Then why are you reading them? Is there someone with a gun at your head forcing you to read them? Then don’t read them and leave the rest of us who want to read about Ron Paul alone. Are you mad because your candidate isn’t able to generate the kind of grass roots support and Internet buzz that Ron Paul is able to generate? Then write articles about how great your candidate’s big government tax and spend programs are going to be and try to create that buzz yourself. Perhaps you’re against a certain issue that Ron Paul is for. Fine, then make that argument and make an intelligent, well thought out argument supporting your point of view, don’t simply dismiss those who support an opposing point of view by calling them names. Or, perhaps you’re against freedom and liberty. Perhaps you’re against the constitution. Maybe you’re one of those who feel the constitution is a quaint antiquity and the bill of rights just gets in the way of your security. Perhaps you simply don’t want to make your own decisions in your life and feel the government should mandate everything for you from what you learn in school to the kind of job you do to what doctor you see for your health care. Perhaps the idea of an endless war on terror appeals to you. Whatever the reason, you’re going to have to defend your position. Ron Paul has rubbed the magic lamp and now the genie is out. The ideas of freedom and liberty are once again loosed upon the world and they are gaining support. Name calling and ignoring Ron Paul and his supporters will not make them go away. People care again. If nothing else, politics in America has changed because of Ron Paul, and I think that’s a good thing.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: asseenonstormfront; comfortablynumbpaul; conservative; gopaulgo; paulbearers; paulcanwin; paulestinians; paulistas; ronpaul; ronpaulforpres; scampi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2007 9:38:38 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Whatever reason one may decide to berate Ron Paul or his supporters, it might be helpful to step back and consider what you’re really against.”

I’m against the liberals who support Ron Paul. Pretending the majority of his support does not come from anti-war liberal nut-roots makes the author of this appear less-than-schmart.


2 posted on 08/17/2007 9:42:40 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Ron Paul Detractors Need a Wake Up Call”

Ron Paul supporters need a brain transplant.


3 posted on 08/17/2007 9:44:12 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

4 posted on 08/17/2007 9:44:31 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Got a big smile on my face from this one.
And here they come...like moths to a flame.
5 posted on 08/17/2007 9:45:28 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
I’m against liberals who support Ron Paul, and the fake Constitutionalist who is leading the gullible right off the cliff playing a pied piper tune.
6 posted on 08/17/2007 9:45:51 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

ping


7 posted on 08/17/2007 9:46:38 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I couldn’t even make a reply before it started. LOL


8 posted on 08/17/2007 9:47:26 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Whatever reason one may decide to berate Ron Paul or his supporters, it might be helpful to step back and consider what you’re really against.”

I’m against dhimmitude and craven selfish defeatists.


9 posted on 08/17/2007 9:48:21 AM PDT by pacelvi (In general, Democrats are the only real reason to vote for Republicans. - Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Break out the Kool Aid again. Here they come.


10 posted on 08/17/2007 9:52:00 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
I think EEE has drank his fill of Paulaid, don’t give him any more or he will end up talking about how steel doesn’t melt and President Bush will fake a terrorist attack as an excuse to go to war with Iran.
11 posted on 08/17/2007 9:53:46 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I AM NOT CRAZY!!!!

IF EVERY CONSERVATIVE and MODERATE voted for RON PAUL - that big, strong tall Texan - THEN HE WOULD WIN!!!!


12 posted on 08/17/2007 10:04:43 AM PDT by rface (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1533669)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The only way Ron Paul could win the republican nomination is if a comet struck one of the republican debates and he was the sole survivor...since the odds of that happening are pretty thin, I have a question; Will his supporters follow him as a third party spoiler(like Ross Perot) and firmly emplace the Beast(the Clintoon pretending to be a woman) in the White House?
13 posted on 08/17/2007 10:07:25 AM PDT by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

On my goodness.

This is just plain weird.

A Paulette demanding that everyone stop “attacking” his candidate, because... well, because he said so.

Allowing no room for the fact that so many of Ron Paul’s positions /invite/ debate (even attack). Sure, some attacks are childish name calling, but most have substance. Do Dr. Paul’s supporters believe his positions should be magically free from skepticism and debate?

He Has Ideas! Therefore, Listen To Him! Worship Him! Thou Shalt Not Detract From Ron Paul’s Glory!

(yeah, but for the most part they’re really BAD ideas. Some of them, like an immediate pullout from Iraq, are scary bad.)

And some say Mitt Romney belongs to a cult.

Oh. My. Goodness.


14 posted on 08/17/2007 10:10:38 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
and the fake Constitutionalist who is leading the gullible right off the cliff playing a pied piper tune

You could be talking about 98% of today's federal Republican elected officials

15 posted on 08/17/2007 10:12:08 AM PDT by uxbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
"I’m against the liberals who support Ron Paul. Pretending the majority of his support does not come from anti-war liberal nut-roots makes the author of this appear less-than-schmart"

Yes, I noticed that after the Iowa Straw Poll, 2 of the first people who praised how great he did were the far-far-left websites (more liberal than many at MoveOn.org and DailyKos): Raw Story and WhatReallyHappened.com

16 posted on 08/17/2007 10:15:34 AM PDT by Impeach98 (Anti-war protestors should try holding rallies in Damascus and Tehran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: L98Fiero

Ron Paul Supporters - 2008 Deaniacs


18 posted on 08/17/2007 10:17:11 AM PDT by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I believe the Pink Floyd had another more fitting song for this thread...

Brain Damage:

The lunatic is on the grass
The lunatic is on the grass
Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs
Got to keep the loonies on the path

The lunatic is in the hall
The lunatics are in my hall
The paper holds their folded faces to the floor
And every day the paper boy brings more

And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head explodes with dark forbodings too
Ill see you on the dark side of the moon

The lunatic is in my head
The lunatic is in my head
You raise the blade, you make the change
You re-arrange me till Im sane
You lock the door
And throw away the key
Theres someone in my head but its not me.

19 posted on 08/17/2007 10:17:58 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
that big, strong tall Texan

Thanks for continuing this joke.. it is the funniest thing I read on Paul threads..

20 posted on 08/17/2007 10:18:20 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson