...humor or politics? ;-)
1 posted on
08/16/2007 10:30:07 PM PDT by
familyop
To: familyop
Aren’t they allowed to defend themselves, and to correct false information?
2 posted on
08/16/2007 10:31:25 PM PDT by
jmcenanly
To: All
Ah...the piece from the BBC with a blurb (quote).
Vatican 'edited Adams web page'The BBC
"
They said news reports alleging Mr Adams's fingerprints and handprints were found on a car used during a double murder in 1971 were edited."
...made for some strange headlines, indeed.
3 posted on
08/16/2007 10:35:39 PM PDT by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
To: familyop
The lefty sites are all in a frenzy over Fox News editing its own entry.
4 posted on
08/16/2007 10:38:03 PM PDT by
balch3
To: familyop
8 posted on
08/16/2007 11:13:33 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: familyop
The VATICAN didn’t do anything. SOMEONE at the Vatican did.
9 posted on
08/16/2007 11:16:43 PM PDT by
vladimir998
(Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
To: familyop
"LL UR INTERNETS B-LONG 2 US!!!!!!1"10 posted on
08/16/2007 11:19:09 PM PDT by
jdm
To: familyop
The article mentions edits coming from specific places, and then mentions that there exist (perhaps in the whole history of wikipedia) edits which have removed material or defaced sites. It doesn’t explicitly say that the specific edits coming from the specific places mentioned are for removing material (though correcting information often does require removing material) or for defacing sites.
14 posted on
08/17/2007 2:50:39 AM PDT by
posterchild
(If you don't look ahead nobody will, there's no time to kill - Clint Black)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson