Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Dog #1
Hard to believe this is the same nation that sent men into the meat grinder at Passendale, the Somme, El Alamen, around Caen and so many other places.

Now they hyperventilate about what is, from a strictly military stand point, an insignificant casualty rate like this?

Why do they even HAVE a military anymore then?

8 posted on 08/13/2007 6:50:14 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ("Todays (military's) task is three dimensional chess in the dark". General Rick Lynch in Baghdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

I don’t think the British military and the British people can be blemd for the statistical research of a newspaper. These casualty rates are higher that those of the US in Vietnam (1 in 46) and the British in Korea. Of course, thopse conflicts used far greater logistics trails.

Britain is also losing more troops proportionally in Iraq than the US.


9 posted on 08/19/2007 10:34:55 AM PDT by uksupport1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson