Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul’s active service member donations get noticed (Troops support Ron Paul)
The Hill ^ | August 3, 2007 | Klaus Marre

Posted on 08/04/2007 6:04:55 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian

Paul’s active service member donations get noticed
By Klaus Marre
August 03, 2007

Rep. Ron Paul (Texas), the anti-Iraq war candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and darling of the Internet, said his colleagues have taken notice that he has raised more money from active service members than any other GOP White House hopeful.

"Lots of military people turned out to be aware that our campaign got more donations from soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines than any other," said Paul in a statement on his website. "Funny, that made a big impression in Congress too. Many of my colleagues were amazed and encouraged that you can be against this unconstitutional and disastrous war, and get military support."

While campaign spokesman Jesse Benton did not name names, he said that "two southern Republicans" recently approached Paul. They noted that his success in getting money from members of the active military is "turning some heads."

Paul said it is "an outrage that we are accused of not supporting the troops" and called it a "scam when the warmongers claim to be pro-soldier."

Despite his popularity on the Internet and a surprisingly strong second quarter fund-raising effort, which saw his campaign haul in $2.4 million, Paul is universally considered as a long shot candidate for the nomination.

However, he told supporters that he is "cautiously optimistic" about next week’s Iowa straw poll.

Paul also noted that he has received some good press about being frugal with his campaign contributions.

"I treat every donation with care, since it comes from a good American who shares our hope for the future, and who had to work hard to earn that money," Paul said.

Benton added that the prudence in spending is a sign of what is to come.

"The way he runs his campaign is a microcosm of how he would run the country," said Benton of his boss. He added that Paul would spend money where it needs to be spent but would otherwise be careful not to waste a penny.


RON PAUL supports the Troops:

...And the Troops support RON PAUL!



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: caughtlying; donors; globalistsundermybed; howtoannoypeople; icecreammandrake; lessthanonepercent; militarysupportlies; militaryvote; paranoidloons; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulistas; paulnutscaughtlying; preciousbodilyfluids; previouslypulled; ronpaulsheeple; sapandimpurify
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-628 next last
Why was this Thread previously pulled?

The FACT that Active Duty US Military are primarily supporting RON PAUL is a legitimate News Story worthy of reporting on Free Republic, which is a Pro-US-Military Website!!

1 posted on 08/04/2007 6:04:56 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; Extremely Extreme Extremist; ...
Great Ron Paul Ping List Alert AGAIN!


Ron Paul campaign website

Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday]
PodcastWeekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave

This Thread should NEVER have been Pulled in the first place; US Military Personnel have every Right to support the Candidate of their choice, and WE have every Right to celebrate their support for RON PAUL!

2 posted on 08/04/2007 6:08:58 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Create your own website.


3 posted on 08/04/2007 6:17:45 AM PDT by philo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; Admin Moderator

Oh, yeah. By all means, go right ahead and thumb your nose at the mods. < /sarc>


4 posted on 08/04/2007 6:19:33 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Unless I'm mistaken, this is based on the same BS study that:
(1) relied on self-identification to determine who was in the military;
(2) referred to "employees" of the military, not soldiers;
(3) had a huge percentage of donations with no employment information, meaning there was a large margin of error; and
(4) the total donations to RP amounted to a mere 1% of all of his donations.

Oh, and RP is still a crackpot with 1%-3% support. He'll be the next manager at the local Wendy's before he's the Republican nominee for President.
5 posted on 08/04/2007 6:21:10 AM PDT by TexasAg1996
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Kind of like trying to push a propped up story about troops supporting Tsongas, or Simon, or LaRouche. JUST AINT HAPPENING.


6 posted on 08/04/2007 6:21:57 AM PDT by angrymarine (I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Pulled...... hell this was discussed a few weeks ago on this thread...........

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-rlc/1868416/posts?


7 posted on 08/04/2007 6:27:25 AM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Admin Moderator
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; Admin Moderator Oh, yeah. By all means, go right ahead and thumb your nose at the mods. < /sarc> 4 posted on 08/04/2007 6:19:33 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I have always resoected the fact that this is Jim Robinson's website, and I have always respected his appointed Moderators.

For all I know, this Thread was previously pulled due to the insane frothing of the Paul-bashers against a good man, Ron Paul, who was Ronald Reagan's choice for Leader of his Electoral Delegation from Texas.

Hopefully, this time around, the Paul-bashers won't be so quick to insult an honorable man who was one of Ronald Reagan's closest supporters.

8 posted on 08/04/2007 6:27:49 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I have always respected the fact that this is Jim Robinson's website, and I have always respected his appointed Moderators.

Ahem... OPie, check your Preview...

9 posted on 08/04/2007 6:29:05 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
For all I know, this Thread was previously pulled due to the insane frothing of the Paul-bashers against a good man, Ron Paul, who was Ronald Reagan's choice for Leader of his Electoral Delegation from Texas.

Nope.

Hopefully, this time around, the Paul-bashers won't be so quick to insult an honorable man who was one of Ronald Reagan's closest supporters.

You're welcome to wish for a pony too.

10 posted on 08/04/2007 6:37:47 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: George W. Bush

Army Times also had a story on it which caused the Paul-bashers to call Army Times a leftwing publication.


Just what is the Army Times?.....

It’s a Gannett publication not owned by the military.

You’ve posted from them and they are on the do not post list here at FR..... Maybe you’d like to alert the Admin Mod to pull that post.....


12 posted on 08/04/2007 6:46:15 AM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

LOL....funny. Looks like you’re on a roll this morning.


13 posted on 08/04/2007 6:50:42 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Okay. For whatever reason this thread was previously pulled, that's your discretion. You've got the thankless job of "herding cats", and Jim Rob trusts you to do so; me, I just pay my monthly subscription.

However, I do hope that you'll allow this thread to remain in the News/Activism Forum this time around. It is News; it concerns Activism (US Military support for Ron Paul), and I hope that Threads concerning US Military support for Republican candidates will be permitted for discussion.

Thank you for moderating the Forum. I don't imagine it's an easy job.

14 posted on 08/04/2007 6:54:54 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

The Army Times being a Gannett publication, links only please.


15 posted on 08/04/2007 6:55:57 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: deport; Admin Moderator
Just what is the Army Times?..... It’s a Gannett publication not owned by the military. You’ve posted from them and they are on the do not post list here at FR...

I posted a fair-use excerpt. I think it's under 300 words (but didn't actually count them yet). And we quite often have fair-use quotes from websites on the do-not-post-articles list, either the ones who have requested no articles posted or those JimRob has banned from FR. Some Paul-bashers have even quoted that notorious banned racist site extensively and posted links here. I didn't see you complain about that, did I?

Of course, I can see why you don't want people to know about RP's military support, given the dismal support all the other GOP candidates (except McCain) have received thus far.

But I am flagging the moderator as you requested if he wants to remove my brief excerpted quote from the upcoming Army Times print edition.
16 posted on 08/04/2007 7:00:29 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Those were early numbers, compiled by Paul supporters from the reports posted on the web at FEC. Not independent examination by media or FEC which confirm those early findings.

It is the same garbage. The article linked by the OP only says that RP claims his fund raising is turning heads: "Rep. Ron Paul (Texas) ... said his colleagues have taken notice that he has raised more money from active service members than any other GOP White House hopeful... Many of my colleagues were amazed and encouraged that you can be against this unconstitutional and disastrous war, and get military support.” It's all based on what RP is claiming others have said.

The Army Times article is the same junk. It requires folks to self-identify themselves as soldiers, which is a pretty sloppy way to do a study and gives you huge margin of errors. And these numbers are pathetic. $14,000 out of $2.5M is supposed to be something significant?
17 posted on 08/04/2007 7:00:40 AM PDT by TexasAg1996
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Interesting that Paul gets more donations from US military personnel than the other candidates.

I am beginning to wonder if the GOP establishment is truly nervous about Paul. More than just the “he cant win” spin


18 posted on 08/04/2007 7:00:44 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (FantasyCollegeBlitz.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Sorry, I thought it was fair-use.


19 posted on 08/04/2007 7:01:06 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
I am beginning to wonder if the GOP establishment is truly nervous about Paul. More than just the “he cant win” spin

Yeah, $14,000 is really gonna turn heads in a race where the leading candidates raised $30M, esp. where the person claiming to be getting the donations is at 1-3% in the polls.

I guess the RP supporters need something to hang their hats on, given the dismal poll numbers.
20 posted on 08/04/2007 7:08:02 AM PDT by TexasAg1996
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-628 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson