Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal's objectivity
New York Times ^ | August 2, 2007

Posted on 08/02/2007 6:35:02 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Notes About Competition All of us who care about journalism will be watching for any sign that news coverage at The Wall Street Journal is being slanted to curry political or economic favor.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: nyt; objectivity; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
I guess only the Times is allowed to slant news coverage!
1 posted on 08/02/2007 6:35:04 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Now that is funny right there, I don’t care who you are.


2 posted on 08/02/2007 6:36:42 AM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

GREAT BIG BRASS DINOSAUR BALLS!!!!!!


3 posted on 08/02/2007 6:36:47 AM PDT by petro45acp (NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal’s objectivity

LOLOLOL! Bawahahahahahah, hehehaha.

OMG this is going to take awhile. HAHAHAHA, heheheh..


4 posted on 08/02/2007 6:37:44 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA........


5 posted on 08/02/2007 6:37:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I think the NY TIMES is the one who hires and publishes news stories from frauds as I recall.

So any who worry about new integrity should be ignore the fish wrap rantings.


6 posted on 08/02/2007 6:38:16 AM PDT by rod1 (uake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal’s objectivity


ROFLMAO


7 posted on 08/02/2007 6:38:16 AM PDT by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

ROTFLMAO! You can’t make this stuff up! The socialist presstitutes at the New York Slimes are worried about objective reporting from another fishwrap? Huh? Al Jazeera, Pravda or The National Enquirer are more “fair and balanced” than the NYT!


8 posted on 08/02/2007 6:39:37 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal

You just can’t make this stuff up -

or

This stuff, up with which you cannot make.


9 posted on 08/02/2007 6:39:47 AM PDT by sodpoodle ( Despair - man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

While they’re busy looking for ‘slant’ in other papers I guess they miss their own slant.


10 posted on 08/02/2007 6:39:58 AM PDT by period end of story (What is the antonym of competition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I think the staff at the Onion have taken over the NYT. There is no other rational explanation for this article.


11 posted on 08/02/2007 6:40:13 AM PDT by scory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I was wondering how long it would take to link the DJ index with the vast right wing conspiracy.


12 posted on 08/02/2007 6:40:39 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Bolshecrat, the amoral party of what if and whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

I am not sure when I have ever seen anything funnier than this!

rofl


13 posted on 08/02/2007 6:40:57 AM PDT by Roamin53 (World War III started on Bill Clinton's watch....he just wasn't sure which side he was on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Given that the Wall Street Journal’s news coverage is very liberal (as opposed to the conservative-leaning editorial page), the Times is no doubt worried that the editorial page is going to become more moderate, and thus deprive readers of a valuable conservative viewpoint. ;)


14 posted on 08/02/2007 6:40:57 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Where is the Scrappleface link?
15 posted on 08/02/2007 6:40:58 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (CLYBURN: Well, that would be a real big problem for us, no question about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Pot calling Kettle, come in Kettle.


16 posted on 08/02/2007 6:41:04 AM PDT by Veggie Todd (Were those magic grits?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!


17 posted on 08/02/2007 6:41:10 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Michael Moore bought Haliburton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

ROTFLMAO! The liberal media have been vocally wringing their hands wondering if Murdoch is going to “ruin” the WSJ by inserting his politics.

YEP, just like he ruined FOX making ABC, CBS and NBC irrelevant in the news business - just like he will soon make the Times and Wash Post irrelevant.....no wonder they are vocalizing their worries.


18 posted on 08/02/2007 6:41:44 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Scrappleface has been made obsolete by a newspaper that parodies itself.


19 posted on 08/02/2007 6:41:56 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Not to worry NYTs where slanting the news is concerned, you will still be the best.
20 posted on 08/02/2007 6:42:42 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson