Skip to comments.
New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal's objectivity
New York Times ^
| August 2, 2007
Posted on 08/02/2007 6:35:02 AM PDT by reaganaut1
Notes About Competition All of us who care about journalism will be watching for any sign that news coverage at The Wall Street Journal is being slanted to curry political or economic favor.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: nyt; objectivity; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
I guess only the Times is allowed to slant news coverage!
To: reaganaut1
Now that is funny right there, I don’t care who you are.
2
posted on
08/02/2007 6:36:42 AM PDT
by
federal
To: reaganaut1
GREAT BIG BRASS DINOSAUR BALLS!!!!!!
3
posted on
08/02/2007 6:36:47 AM PDT
by
petro45acp
(NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
To: reaganaut1
New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal’s objectivity
LOLOLOL! Bawahahahahahah, hehehaha.
OMG this is going to take awhile. HAHAHAHA, heheheh..
4
posted on
08/02/2007 6:37:44 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: reaganaut1
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA........
5
posted on
08/02/2007 6:37:50 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
To: reaganaut1
I think the NY TIMES is the one who hires and publishes news stories from frauds as I recall.
So any who worry about new integrity should be ignore the fish wrap rantings.
6
posted on
08/02/2007 6:38:16 AM PDT
by
rod1
(uake)
To: reaganaut1
New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal’s objectivity
ROFLMAO
7
posted on
08/02/2007 6:38:16 AM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
To: reaganaut1
ROTFLMAO! You can’t make this stuff up! The socialist presstitutes at the New York Slimes are worried about objective reporting from another fishwrap? Huh? Al Jazeera, Pravda or The National Enquirer are more “fair and balanced” than the NYT!
8
posted on
08/02/2007 6:39:37 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
To: federal
You just can’t make this stuff up -
or
This stuff, up with which you cannot make.
9
posted on
08/02/2007 6:39:47 AM PDT
by
sodpoodle
( Despair - man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
To: reaganaut1
While they’re busy looking for ‘slant’ in other papers I guess they miss their own slant.
To: reaganaut1
I think the staff at the Onion have taken over the NYT. There is no other rational explanation for this article.
11
posted on
08/02/2007 6:40:13 AM PDT
by
scory
To: reaganaut1
I was wondering how long it would take to link the DJ index with the vast right wing conspiracy.
12
posted on
08/02/2007 6:40:39 AM PDT
by
depressed in 06
(Bolshecrat, the amoral party of what if and whine.)
To: crazyhorse691
I am not sure when I have ever seen anything funnier than this!
rofl
13
posted on
08/02/2007 6:40:57 AM PDT
by
Roamin53
(World War III started on Bill Clinton's watch....he just wasn't sure which side he was on!)
To: reaganaut1
Given that the Wall Street Journal’s news coverage is very liberal (as opposed to the conservative-leaning editorial page), the Times is no doubt worried that the editorial page is going to become more moderate, and thus deprive readers of a valuable conservative viewpoint. ;)
14
posted on
08/02/2007 6:40:57 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: reaganaut1
Where is the Scrappleface link?
15
posted on
08/02/2007 6:40:58 AM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(CLYBURN: Well, that would be a real big problem for us, no question about that.)
To: reaganaut1
Pot calling Kettle, come in Kettle.
16
posted on
08/02/2007 6:41:04 AM PDT
by
Veggie Todd
(Were those magic grits?)
To: reaganaut1
17
posted on
08/02/2007 6:41:10 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
(Michael Moore bought Haliburton)
To: reaganaut1
ROTFLMAO! The liberal media have been vocally wringing their hands wondering if Murdoch is going to “ruin” the WSJ by inserting his politics.
YEP, just like he ruined FOX making ABC, CBS and NBC irrelevant in the news business - just like he will soon make the Times and Wash Post irrelevant.....no wonder they are vocalizing their worries.
18
posted on
08/02/2007 6:41:44 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: reaganaut1
Scrappleface has been made obsolete by a newspaper that parodies itself.
19
posted on
08/02/2007 6:41:56 AM PDT
by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
To: reaganaut1
Not to worry NYTs where slanting the news is concerned, you will still be the best.
20
posted on
08/02/2007 6:42:42 AM PDT
by
Ditter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson