New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal's objectivity

New York Times ^ | August 2, 2007

[reaganaut1]

Notes About Competition All of us who care about journalism will be watching for any sign that news coverage at The Wall Street Journal is being slanted to curry political or economic favor.

[reaganaut1]

I guess only the Times is allowed to slant news coverage!

[federal]

Now that is funny right there, I don’t care who you are.

[petro45acp]

GREAT BIG BRASS DINOSAUR BALLS!!!!!!

[bill1952]

New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal’s objectivity

LOLOLOL! Bawahahahahahah, hehehaha.

OMG this is going to take awhile. HAHAHAHA, heheheh..

[Red Badger]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA........

[rod1]

I think the NY TIMES is the one who hires and publishes news stories from frauds as I recall.

So any who worry about new integrity should be ignore the fish wrap rantings.

[crazyhorse691]

New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal’s objectivity

---

ROFLMAO

[2ndDivisionVet]

ROTFLMAO! You can’t make this stuff up! The socialist presstitutes at the New York Slimes are worried about objective reporting from another fishwrap? Huh? Al Jazeera, Pravda or The National Enquirer are more “fair and balanced” than the NYT!

[sodpoodle]

You just can’t make this stuff up -

or

This stuff, up with which you cannot make.

[period end of story]

While they’re busy looking for ‘slant’ in other papers I guess they miss their own slant.

[scory]

I think the staff at the Onion have taken over the NYT. There is no other rational explanation for this article.

[depressed in 06]

I was wondering how long it would take to link the DJ index with the vast right wing conspiracy.

[Roamin53]

I am not sure when I have ever seen anything funnier than this!

rofl

[Mr. Jeeves]

Given that the Wall Street Journal’s news coverage is very liberal (as opposed to the conservative-leaning editorial page), the Times is no doubt worried that the editorial page is going to become more moderate, and thus deprive readers of a valuable conservative viewpoint. ;)

[InvisibleChurch]

Where is the Scrappleface link?

[Veggie Todd]

Pot calling Kettle, come in Kettle.

[Tribune7]

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

[1Old Pro]

ROTFLMAO! The liberal media have been vocally wringing their hands wondering if Murdoch is going to “ruin” the WSJ by inserting his politics.

YEP, just like he ruined FOX making ABC, CBS and NBC irrelevant in the news business - just like he will soon make the Times and Wash Post irrelevant.....no wonder they are vocalizing their worries.

[Lee'sGhost]

Scrappleface has been made obsolete by a newspaper that parodies itself.

[Ditter]

Not to worry NYTs where slanting the news is concerned, you will still be the best.

[italianquaker]

This is scrappleface right?

[Puppage]

New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal's objectivity

Ummmm, yeeeahhhhh.

[jazusamo]

LOL! Surely they jest.

[yldstrk]

What a load. Like the NYT would even be able to recognize objectivity if it bit them.......

[Robe]

You Called??

[sodpoodle]

“””The best way for Mr. Murdoch to protect his $5 billion investment is to protect The Journal’s editorial quality and integrity”””

While the NYT protects its hypocrisy!

[FreedomNeocon]

Soon Dan Rather will be speaking out, all a twitter with concern over the “objectivity” of news reporting...

[ontap]

Can anyone at the New York Times even spell objectivity.

[rightinthemiddle]

As I recall, there was a study done that showed the WSJ’s new converage was the one of the most LIBERAL in the county, even more than the NYT...just the editorial page leaned conservative.

Wish I could remember what/when...it was discussed on FR.

[Ikemeister]

Now, ain’t that a hoot!

[norwaypinesavage]

"New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal's objectivity"

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

[LibLieSlayer]

ny times... “Only WE have the right to lie to and propagandize to dumba$$ Americans”!

LLS

[george76]

[alloysteel]

Next thing you know, CBS is going to start sniping at Fox.

The old order changeth.

And some kinds of change are not at all welcome.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Laughable.

[jr48154]

In other news, former NBA official Tim Donaghy voiced suspician over some of the calls made in last night’s Yankees-White Sox matchup...

[LibLieSlayer]

Things at WSJ are about to change... BACK to what NEWS PAPERS were once in America.

LLS

[brownsfan]

“YEP, just like he ruined FOX ... “

Well, in my opinion he’s well on the way to ruining FOX, but for different reasons than the libs would say. I am growing very weary of Brittny, Paris, car chases and Greta’s search for the missing white woman du jour.

Now that they’ve consciously encouraged BOR to yell at guests and vice versa, it’s nearly unwatchable.

[econjack]

Those readers, and all of us who care about journalism, will be watching for any sign that news coverage is being slanted to curry political or economic favor.

Oh, paaaleeeze...If you want to be en garde about watching for slanted coverage, take a peek in your own editorial offices.

[God luvs America]

bump

[TruthWillWin]

This is a joke right?

[Clara Lou]

New York Times worries about Wall Street Journal's objectivity
Early morning humor is always good.

[joebuck]

"The best way for Mr. Murdoch to protect his $5 billion investment is to protect The Journal’s editorial quality and integrity."

I'm sure Mr. Murdoch, the most successful media mogul in history, doesn't need business advice from a company that's headed for bankruptcy faster than Michael Moore can devour a honey glazed ham.

[SMARTY]

s’cuse me.... I thought objectivity was the name of the game in ‘journalism’

[roses of sharon]

The NYT bathhouse boys had better watch their backs!

[Nickname]

Yeah, because the NYT is a paragon of virtue, unbiased reporting, and has no agenda whatsoever.

ROFL!

[Tanniker Smith]

“Hello, Mr. Pott? This is Ms. Kettle. You’re black.”

[BibChr]

Buck Murdock: Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

[Calvin Locke]

I am not sure when I have ever seen anything funnier than this!

Oh, I can. Right on the opinion pages of the WSJ. When they published Al Hunt's columns.

[cvq3842]

I suppose, given the Times’ history, they would consider any coverage of Stalin’s purges, the Holocaust, or Castro’s repression to be evidence of “bias.”

Sometimes I really have to look twice to make sure these stories are not parodies.

But the truth is absurd enough these days!