Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/27/2007 7:25:50 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BGHater

Whats the big deal? The MSM takes the word of retired arm chair Generals over active duty troops 100% of the time.


2 posted on 07/27/2007 7:29:31 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
Hmm, this is a weird criticism. Forget about whether the approach is working or not; let's criticize the type of people who suggested it to the President!

This must mean the surge is doing quite well; no one seems to have a real criticism of it.

4 posted on 07/27/2007 7:40:35 AM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

The Pentagon itself is full of “armchair generals”. Very few of our military decision-makers have actual battlefield experience. They seem more interested in persecuting their own soldiers than actually winning this “war”.


6 posted on 07/27/2007 7:51:17 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Here’s some armchair advice: how about not giving the world advance notice of all our war plans? Surprise is certainly no element in this war—which makes General Petraeus’ success thus far even more remarkable.


7 posted on 07/27/2007 8:01:15 AM PDT by KingSnorky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
joining such prominent conservatives as John Bolton, David Frum and Michael Ledeen.

Personally, I think Scarborough's piece is a crock. Gen Petraeus is the acknowledged expert in counter-insurgency, and the surge is the product of his and others' accumulated knowledge on the subject. Not to say that Gen Keane isn't also expert, but to attribute it to neo-cons is silly.

As a matter of fact, Bolton is on record a couple months ago saying that he wasn't a supporter of the Iraq strategy in the first place. He wanted to go in, break things, change governments, warn that we'd IMMEDIATELY do it again if we weren't left alone, and then get out. I believed in that strategy at the beginning. But the President was the CINC and there was nothing unethical or illogical about wanting to rebuild Iraq. He deserved his shot. I admire his courage for taking it and sticking to his guns. The good Lord knows we must insist that we'll not allow any Mid-East minions to project power against the US.

Now I favor a backup Plan B that calls for the confederal equivalent of a tri-partite Iraq....divide and conquer.

12 posted on 07/27/2007 6:22:55 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
Victory has a thousand fathers.

Curious how two strident arch Dincon Iraq critics like Frum and Ledeen are now suppose to be part of the group claiming credit for the Surge’s success.

Funny how NONE of these people ever wrote anything supporting their supposed Iraq strategy.

Curious how the ONLY source for this claim is the group itself. There is no independent verification of the claims.

I would take this claim with a very large grain of salt.

13 posted on 07/28/2007 5:47:49 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Ignorance can be cured by education, stupidity is a terminal condition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson