Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second Amendment case headed to Court (DC appeals Parker case to SCOTUS)
SCOTUSBLOG ^ | Monday, July 16, 2007

Posted on 07/16/2007 8:03:08 AM PDT by ctdonath2

Local government officials in Washington, D.C., decided on Monday to appeal to the Supreme Court in a major test case on the meaning of the Second Amendment. The key issue in the coming petition will be whether the Amendment protects an individual right to have guns in one's home.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; guns; scotus; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2007 8:03:08 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: admin

Admin, please append “(DC appeals Parker case to SCOTUS)” to title to assist clarity & searching.


2 posted on 07/16/2007 8:05:19 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Woo-hoo!

It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.


3 posted on 07/16/2007 8:08:05 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Local government officials in Washington, D.C., announced Monday they will appeal to the Supreme Court in a major test case on the meaning of the Second Amendment. The key issue in the coming petition will be whether the Amendment protects an individual right to have guns in one’s home- an issue on which there is now a clear conflict among federal Circuit Courts.

The petition would have been due Aug. 7, but city officials said they would ask Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., for a 30-day extension of time to file the case. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty and city Attorney General Linda Singer disclosed the appeal plan at a press conference, along with local Police Chief Cathy Lanier.

The D.C. Circuit Court ruled on March 9 that the Second Amendment does guarantee an individual right to possess a gun — at least within one’s own home. The case is Parker, et al., v. District of Columbia (docket 04-7041). On May 8, the Circuit Court refused by a 6-4 vote to rehear the case en banc. The mandate is scheduled to be issued Aug. 7, but will be withheld after the city files its Supreme Court petition.


4 posted on 07/16/2007 8:09:08 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: ctdonath2

government officials unwilling to accept the Second Amendment, as written. When there is no Second, the First will be the next to go. One has to wonder who these people are and why they are here in America, hating America. A Second makes the First possible, but liberals are too stupid to understand or too willing to destroy America to care. Too willing to destroy America to care - has my vote.


6 posted on 07/16/2007 8:11:17 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

The wrong decision in this case would start a civil war.


7 posted on 07/16/2007 8:12:51 AM PDT by Lexington Green (There ain't no news in the news no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

The question shouldn’t even come up regarding guns in the home. That is a give and has always been that way. The real question is the people carrying guns on the streets of DC. DC is one of the most dangerous citys in the country..................that includes Congress by the way.


8 posted on 07/16/2007 8:14:15 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

The DC Government better get the assistance of outside counsel, because I’ve looked at some of their filings in the Parker case, and it’s embarrassing.


9 posted on 07/16/2007 8:15:20 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

The question at hand IS “in the home”. It hasn’t “been that way” in DC for 30 years.

“On the streets” will come later.


10 posted on 07/16/2007 8:15:49 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Alright, exclude me from the aforementioned “we,” OK?


11 posted on 07/16/2007 8:17:51 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green

The wrong decision in this case would start a civil war.

The wrong decision in this case WILL start a civil war.

The amendments prop each other up, remove one and they all crumble.


12 posted on 07/16/2007 8:18:33 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE ("life is dangerous")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Part of the requirements for Dhimmi status of non-Muslims under sharia law is the banning of personal weapons.

Once again, the American Left is in lock-step with previous totalitarians (Stalin, Hitler) and their present-day replacements: Islamonazis.

13 posted on 07/16/2007 8:19:10 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Ultimately, we need a case that challenges Miller, which was argued and decided with only one side testifying. There was no national gun rights defense group then. It didn't seem necessary.

-Eric

14 posted on 07/16/2007 8:19:54 AM PDT by E Rocc (Resident Smartass and Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Woo-hoo! It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

What makes you think that the supremes will hear the case or more importantly find in favor of the individual right?

15 posted on 07/16/2007 8:20:48 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black; Travis McGee

Paging the CWII pinglist people...


16 posted on 07/16/2007 8:22:15 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: E Rocc

That will come promptly after [i]Parker[/i].


18 posted on 07/16/2007 8:23:05 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Fill me in.
How can I help in this fight?
(I for one would like to AVOID a civil war—if possible.)

If not—lock and load, boys and girls.


19 posted on 07/16/2007 8:23:31 AM PDT by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson