Posted on 07/04/2007 1:02:17 AM PDT by goldstategop
It is among the odder ironies of modern political life that the Fourth of July, a holiday set aside to celebrate American exceptionalism, has become an occasion to proclaim multicultural pieties.
For a vivid demonstration of this tendency, look no further than the habit of our high-minded commentators to lecture every Independence Day that we are a nation of immigrants. In in its most extreme incarnation, this claim holds not only that America has been a nation of immigrants from its very inception an observation equal parts true and misleading but that any reflection on the American character that fails to pay proper homage to immigration is itself a kind of intellectual treason. Historian Oscar Handlin, aptly summing up the view, has written that immigrants were American history.
Its an argument that holds considerable appeal for many, not least immigrants themselves. I should know: My family immigrated to this country legally from the late Soviet Union in 1989, and for many years I subscribed to the cheerfully naïve view that immigration was an unqualified good.
In part, this was instilled by the American public-education system. As a fourth-grader, I remember being taken on a class trip to Ellis Island, where we were instructed to envision boats of lowly immigrants emerging from the offshore mists to their refuge beneath the Statue of Liberty. More important, perhaps, was the influence of my Jewish background. I judged the matter historically: Hadnt Stalin launched his anti-Semitic purges by denouncing Jews as rootless cosmopolitans, unworthy of the trust of citizenship? Hadnt the United States welcomed Jewish émigrés? Didnt they succeed spectacularly? What more was there to consider?
American Jewish organizations, to be sure, do little to discourage such unreflective romanticism. Thus, the American Jewish Committee justifies its 100-year long support for generous immigration policies and its obdurate reluctance to support the enforcement of immigration laws on the grounds that these positions are consistent with Jewish values. To which it might be countered: Whose Jewish values? Not, presumably, those of Samuel Gompers, the Jewish president of the American Federation of Labor. An immigrant himself, Gompers nonetheless emerged in the early decades of the last century as a leading foe of unrestricted immigration.
Plainly, the dominant ethnic narrative on immigration was suspect. But it was seeing the real-life consequences of mass immigration, including illegal immigration, that ultimately shattered my faith in its blessings.
At first glance, my home state of New Jersey may seem an unlikely vantage point from which to consider the immigration issue. But consider that of the estimated 11 to 12 million immigrants in the United States, 425,000 reside in New Jersey, no trivial fact in the countrys fifth-smallest state. Of these, a majority have arrived only in the past few years. The results, alas, bear little relation to immigrant success stories enshrined in national lore.
Examine the evidence. Hispanic street gangs like the Latin Kings and the MS-13 have prospered, their numbers swelled by the influx of illegal immigrants. Countless communities suffer from overcrowding, an ever-escalating problem in the countrys most densely populated state. State services have been stretched to the full, as illegal immigrants who pay no taxes take every advantage of the privileges afforded by one of the highest-taxed states in the nation. New Jersey hospitals, for instance, now spend $300 million a year to treat illegal immigrants. (Adding a further strain to the hospitals budget, many immigrants fly in relatives from their home countries to receive medical care, which American hospitals are obligated to provide, then leave the hospitals with the bill.) It was this madness, I came to realize, that the late Milton Friedman had in mind when he cautioned that you cant have free immigration and a welfare state.
All this is bad enough. What makes the situation intolerable is that grassroots efforts from New Jersey residents to gain control of the problem have time and again met with frustration. In 2006, the town of Bound Brook, prompted by concerns about overcrowding in housing rented by Hispanic immigrants, launched a series of housing raids to address the problem. For its pains, the town was rewarded with a discrimination lawsuit from President Bushs Department of Justice, which charged that the town was illegally targeting Hispanics. In the end, the town not only had to pay a $425,000 settlement to the illegal immigrants, but it was compelled to hire a Spanish-speaking housing coordinator to revise its housing and zoning laws to accommodate the lawbreakers. Nor is this an isolated incident. Consult the local newspapers, and you will find that such brazen contempt for the law has become a feature of daily life in the state.
Not to fear, open-borders enthusiasts will tell you: The problem is not immigration but assimilation. Assimilate immigrants, and you eliminate the adverse effects of immigration. Move beyond the platitudes, though, and the defect in this theory becomes immediately apparent: It wrongly assumes a national consensus about the importance of assimilation and the meaning of American citizenship. In reality, powerful immigrant lobbying organizations like the National Council of La Raza draw their strength from thwarting assimilation, ensuring thereby that succeeding generations of Hispanic immigrants will benefit from its advocacy for racial preferences, bilingual education and mass immigration from Latin American countries. Further complicating assimilation, prominent voices in the media and academic worlds preach that nationalism is an outdated notion, assuring all who will listen that the United States, rather than the product of distinctive culture, beliefs, values and institutions (the very things that Independence Day is intended to honor) is an ideological abstraction to which anyone can lay claim.
Readers will of course recognize that these arguments, and others more specious, were recently deployed to sell the country on the failed immigration bill. President Bush, in arguably his least distinguished moment, claimed that opponents of Senates plan to provide amnesty for illegal immigrants while doing little to enforce the border don't want to do whats right for America. Its a deep division not between Right and Left but between the public and the elites, Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, told me last month. On one side, you have big business, big media, big philanthropy, and big government. So, how can the bill fail? Yet, Krikorian predicted that fail it would.
He was right. Despite a steady flow of disinformation and abuse, key Senators, responding to their constituents, killed the bill last week. In an age of mass cynicism about politics, it was proof that the government must occasionally heed the demands of the governed. On this Fourth of July, thats another thing this immigrant will celebrate.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Demand a border fence! Build it NOW!! Beef up the border patrol and close our borders!
U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121
White House comments: (202) 456-1111
Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep
Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Toll free to the US Senate:
1-800-882-2005. (Spanish number)
1-800-417-7666. (English number)
Courtesy of a pro-amnesty group, no less!!
Republican National Committee
310 First Street, SE Washington, D.C. 20003
phone: 202.863.8500 | fax: 202.863.8820 | e-mail: info@gop.com
Take a look at their hidden agenda: http://www.mexica-movement.org
bttt
Independence Day is a good time to put to bed the favorite liberal mantra about immigration, that “America was built by immigrants.”
It was not. America was developed, built and made great by a relatively few Europeans from northwestern Europe. They were explorers, settlers, traders and chance-takers.
Immigrants came later to take advantage of a plug-it-in-and-turn-it-on ready-made civilization.
There were no Patagonians, Asians, Africans, or Mexicans on the Mayflower.
B T T T
“In 2006, the town of Bound Brook, prompted by concerns about overcrowding in housing rented by Hispanic immigrants, launched a series of housing raids to address the problem. For its pains, the town was rewarded with a discrimination lawsuit from President Bushs Department of Justice, which charged that the town was illegally targeting Hispanics. In the end, the town not only had to pay a $425,000 settlement to the illegal immigrants, but it was compelled to hire a Spanish-speaking housing coordinator to revise its housing and zoning laws to accommodate the lawbreakers. Nor is this an isolated incident. Consult the local newspapers, and you will find that such brazen contempt for the law has become a feature of daily life in the state. “
DOJ/Al Capone.......what’s the difference??
ditto that!
Happy Independence Day!
The truth is until recently immigrants had to swim or sink on their own. There were no "benefits", no welfare, no heap, no food stamps , no free health care.
If they could not "make it' here " they went home ( and many did) .
It is time to 1) cut out 100% of social services to non citizens ( even those here legally) 2) develop a reporting system of monitoring the people entering this country on work or student or vacation visas.
If they miss their reporting day they become a federal fugitive and subject to arrest by the local and fed police
3) Fingerprint ID for every student , and worker that can be checked against federal records to make sure 3 people are not using the same ID name or SS # 4) THE SS administration and IRS should have to report every one double using a SS # (right now SS KNOWS where many illegals are but will not disclose it )
5) BUILD A DOUBLE WALL ACROSS THE SOUTHERN BORDER
bttt!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.