Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you want to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
Posted on 06/27/2007 6:49:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
thinking not included.. we’re talking about “the left” here...
A bit snide, what?
Tomorrow will be the final installment of this series, and I will post it at that time. If all they have is “Fred is lazy” and “he was once a lobbyist”, Senator Thompson needs to make an appoinment to pick out new drapes for the Oval Office...
Jason remains a bit clueless. The other guy’s more on track.
Funny that they don’t realize that instead of speaking at the NRLC in front of a few, he got to make a video that was viewed by millions AND got a standing ovation from the NRLC.
He can win. But only if he actually enters the race.
He is the most talked about candidate now, and he has yet to spend a single dime. He has gotten $20-30 million in free advertising, he is being drafted by a huge grass roots movement, and he doesn’t need to associate with the pigmy’s now running for president to gain credibility, he has plenty of gravitas all on his own.
Should be about a week from now, IIRC...
What the hell was his name? Rogers...Regen, Rea, yeah, that was it, that guys name was Reagan.
I'll take another one of those.
Yeah, but without the side of RINO this time (i.e., GHWB).
Is that so? Curious. - I don't know of anyone up to this point who mentioned that in conjunction with his presidential aspirations. - or anyone at all, for that matter.
Perhaps the writer has a sore spot from whatever he is writing about, but I doubt that it has a any bearing on our support for Fred.
Oh, I get it now. Fred is lazy because he doesn’t run around spewing mindless sound bites, incessantly redefining his ‘beliefs’ and explaining why conservatives should vote for liberals like Rudy and Mitt... and shrieking “We gotta do something” at every overblown ‘crisis’ invented by the blood-drenched gutter press.
I’m more than happy to have a ‘lazy’ candidate like that. I prefer that to the frenetic Rino and Demon candidates who, for all practical purposes, act like they are snorting crank 15 times a day.
Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you want to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
Aah, the “Fred is Lazy” route.
Fred is the kind of guy that is so likeable, laid back, and softspoken, you don’t realize he just kicked your a$$.
The office is about charecter too.
In the months ahead you’ll see footage of Fred Thompson, seeking the truth, as a lawyer a the Watergate hearings (He asked the question to Butterfield that doomed Nixon).
Remember that according to Jerome Ziefman, who was lead Dem counsel, Hillary didn’t believe Nixon was entitled to an Impeachment lawyer.
That’s the difference between the two in a nutshell.
That's not a political statement. It's a fact.
Right, and the surprising thing is how successful he has been at everything he has tried.
Just think what he could do if he had a little more ambition.
Democrats talking point about Fred Thompson
- he’s lazy, because he don’t follow everyone else
- evil lobbyist who makes $60k/year for 20 years, not the good lobbyists on the Democrats side that makes millions/year like Clinton
Well, beats those hyperactive idiots on dems’ roster. It's about time someone noticed that.
JCEccles wrote: “The truth is, Fred is lazy. That’s not a political statement. It’s a fact.”
No, it isn’t. It’s just more of JCEccles’ usual lies. Total BS without a single supporting shred of evidence...
There IS solid evidence, however, for the opposite view:
*
Every profile I’ve read on Thompson contains references, by the typical unnamed coward sources, to him being “lazy”, his Senate career lackluster, and gasp, there’s not a piece of legislation with his name on it! (Well gee, Teddy Kennedy has his name on a bunch of bills – and that’s made the nation a better place, n’est ce pas?)
My experience with Senator Thompson dates to when I was the public affairs chief for GAO, the Government Accountability Office, a legislative branch agency providing oversight of the feds. Thompson was chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, the complementary panel to GAO. It’s kind of a backwater committee, with not the visibility of say, Foreign Affairs, or Armed Services, or Appropriations. But the committee is essential to investigating the mechanics of government – and how those gears can be made to work more efficiently.
So yeah, Thompson was a big show boater – a huge proponent of the Clinger-Cohen Information Technology Management Reform Act of 1996, doncha know; which required that the “government information technology shop be operated exactly as an efficient and profitable business would be operated.” Then there was his support for the President’s Management Agenda, announced in the summer of 2001, “an aggressive strategy for improving the management of the Federal government…focusing on Expanding E-Government: Improved Service Delivery for the American People Using Information Technology and Expanding E-Government: Partnering for a Results-Oriented Government.” Yowzah, man, hot Hot HOT! Front page baby!
...So now I hear the stories about Thompson, which are typical of 1. Opponents who want to drag him down, which is the way it works, and 2. A lazy press corps who but for a few stalwarts, didn’t cover this subject matter when Thompson was preaching at the wind.
Now, I’m too much of a nothing burger to have any say in this race. But Thompson, whatever his faults, is not getting a fair shake. When you’re waxing on about OMB circulars and Clinger-Cohen’s e-billing protocols, you’re not exactly lazy or lackluster. In fact, you’re actually doing what government is supposed to be doing, which is trying to do better.
- Jeff Nelligan, The Coastmaster..., June 8, 2007
http://coastmaster.blogspot.com/2007/06/no-slacker-big-fred-grinds-it-out.html
*
Norman Ornstein, a congressional scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank, said he saw Thompson as a thoughtful lawmaker able to reach across party lines.
“He worked plenty and he absorbed plenty,” said Ornstein.
Thomas Ferraro, Capitol Hill Blue, June 2, 2007
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/2619
*
In interviews, several of his former Senate aides expressed surprise at suggestions by unnamed critics that their old boss might be lethargic.
“Whoever says this man is lazy never worked for him,” said Bill Outhier, a former aide who recalled the campaign finance staff “working until midnight” because the senator was still in the office.
- Julia Malone, Cox News Service, May 11, 2007
*
As Robert Novak reported last week, the rap againt Thomspon is that “he was not a hard worker during his eight years in the Senate.” Yet I’m told by a source who was there that Thompson was a reasonably diligent member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. In any case, this rap is unlikely to hurt Thompson with voters outside the beltway.
What will matter is whether Thompson is prepared to campaign diligently for the nomination. If so, he likely will represent a force to be reckoned with.
- Paul Mirengoff, Power Line, March 25, 2007
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/017150.php
*
The rap on Thompson is that he was “lazy” when he was in the Senate. This is precisely the same sort of rap that Leftists made about Ronald Reagan. In fact, this is strength. Because Thompson acts from principle, he does not need to engage in the Machiavellian machinations which pass for “work” in Washington. The reality is that it is absurd to consider Thompson, who has worked during his life in more real jobs than almost any politician in Washington and who today stars in two television programs as well as being the substitute for Paul Harvey and a frequent commentator in conservative periodicals is “lazy” at all. Like Reagan, he probably works harder than anyone in Washington.
- Bruce Walker, Intellectual Conservative, March 22, 2007
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/03/22/yes-the-next-reagan
*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.