Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Promoting Movie About Press Freedom, Jolie Bans Press from Interviews
NewsBusters.org ^ | 6/14/2007 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 06/14/2007 7:27:15 AM PDT by Pyro7480

How do you spell hypocrite? Apparently it's J-O-L-I-E as the puff-lipped actress proves by banning Fox News from being permitted to interview her to promote her new role as the wife of martyred reporter Daniel Pearl in the upcoming movie "A Mighty Heart." As Jolie touts press freedom, her newest pet cause, she inexplicably put several restrictions on that very freedom of the press -- and not just against Fox News.

Fox News' Roger Friedman reports Jolie's hypocrisy.

'Mighty' Hypocrite Angelina Jolie Bans FOX and Others From Premiere

But Jolie turns out to be a mighty hypocrite when it comes to her own freedom of the press. Her lawyer required all journalists to sign a contract before talking to her, and Jolie instructed publicists at first to ban FOX News from the red carpet of her premiere.

Ironically, Wednesday night's premiere of the excellent Michael Winterbottom-directed film was meant to support an organization called Reporters Without Borders. Jolie, however, did everything she could to clamp down on the press and control it.

Do none off these Hollywierd people have even the tiniest ability at introspection? Or are they so absolutely sure of their own god-like status that the fallibility of ordinary man is beyond their kin in their minds? Are they so focused on their ultimate goals that the path to them is immaterial? Is integrity such an unknown concept out on the left coast?

She wasn't done with just attempting to ban Fox from the red carpet, either.

Reporters from most major media outlets balked Wednesday when they were presented with an agreement drawn up by Jolie's Hollywood lawyer Robert Offer. The contract closely dictated the terms of all interviews.

Reporters were asked to agree to "not ask Ms. Jolie any questions regarding her personal relationships. In the event Interviewer does ask Ms. Jolie any questions regarding her personal relationships, Ms. Jolie will have the right to immediately terminate the interview and leave."

The agreement also required that "the interview may only be used to promote the Picture. In no event may Interviewer or Media Outlet be entitled to run all or any portion of the interview in connection with any other story. ... The interview will not be used in a manner that is disparaging, demeaning, or derogatory to Ms. Jolie."

If that wasn't enough, Jolie also requires that if any of these things happen, "the tape of the interview will not be released to Interviewer." Such a violation, the signatory thus agrees, would "cause Jolie irreparable harm" and make it possible for her to sue the interviewer and seek a restraining order.

What can I say further? I'd love to expound on this story, but there really isn't anything more that can be gainfully said.

Like most in Hollywierd, Jolie is an utter hypocrite.

That's about the whole length and breadth of this story.

The worst thing is, knowing how these people are, the media still fall all over themselves to give such people the kind of air time they desire to flog their causes.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angelinajolie; despotism; foxbashing; foxnews; jolie; press; stalinisttactic; starkravingsocialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
So she's crazy AND a hypocrite...
1 posted on 06/14/2007 7:27:17 AM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

But she’s hot!


2 posted on 06/14/2007 7:31:08 AM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I once interviewed Edward Teller at the National Press Club.

Before I turned on my tape recorder, Dr. Teller insisted on two things: 1) Nothing he said could be edited and 2) He would only answer FIVE questions.

A brilliant man, but a real PITA. :)


3 posted on 06/14/2007 7:31:29 AM PDT by RexBeach (Americans never quit. -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Crazy and a hypocrite? Sounds like you are referring to Courtney Love.

There is a sequence in the documentary Kurt and Courtney where phoned threats against a reporter are played against footage of Courtney winning some kind of “free speech advocate” award (maybe from the ACLU?).

I don’t recall if they extended into death threats against the reporter or not.


4 posted on 06/14/2007 7:32:51 AM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

pics?


5 posted on 06/14/2007 7:33:14 AM PDT by Frapster (Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I want to know what she and Brad are doing (or not doing) to their kids. They NEVER smile. Sad.


6 posted on 06/14/2007 7:33:27 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe ("I'll see you at the bill signing" - Pres Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

The kids have probably been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements.


7 posted on 06/14/2007 7:36:00 AM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Not really...tattooed freak is more like it.


8 posted on 06/14/2007 7:36:44 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Yes, and some people said the same thing about Jane Fonda. I guess if you’re pretty enough you can get away with anything.


9 posted on 06/14/2007 7:37:01 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Not one MSM member protested her censorship of the press? How odd that they would be so blithely complicit.
10 posted on 06/14/2007 7:39:51 AM PDT by benjamin032
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Why don’t the press just IGNORE her, en masse? Her head would explode!


11 posted on 06/14/2007 7:40:33 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
The kids have probably been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements.

Brad and Jolie signed pre-nups and the kids had to sign sign pre-natals.

12 posted on 06/14/2007 7:42:25 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Just a warm place to grow STDs.


13 posted on 06/14/2007 7:43:41 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Interesting how the leftists, from Jolie to all the Democrat Presidential candidates, want Fox out of the equation.

It’s not as if Fox toes the conservative line, it’s more that it’s the one major broadcast outlet that doesn’t work to actively advance “the agenda.”

Amazing how shaky “the agenda” is, then, when it can’t even withstand a “fair and balanced” newscast.


14 posted on 06/14/2007 7:47:03 AM PDT by JennysCool ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
So she's crazy AND a hypocrite...

And soon to become a member of the Council On Foreign Relations. LOL.

Seriously, banning or censoring certain members of the press is just stupid, especially in this context.
15 posted on 06/14/2007 7:55:18 AM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

She has almost as many restrictions as Happy Fun Ball


16 posted on 06/14/2007 8:02:20 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

“Puff-lipped” haha.


17 posted on 06/14/2007 8:04:45 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Lol! I’d forgotten about the Happy Fun Ball! What a toy!!

Happy FUN BALL!
-only $14.95-

Warning: Pregnant women, the elderly and children under 10 should avoid prolonged exposure to Happy Fun Ball.
Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.
Happy Fun Ball Contains a liquid core, which, if exposed due to rupture, should not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.
Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete.

Discontinue use of Happy Fun Ball if any of the following occurs:
Itching
Vertigo
Dizziness
Tingling in extremities
Loss of balance or coordination
Slurred speech
Temporary blindness
Profuse sweating
Heart palpitations

If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain types of skin.

When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration...

Failure to do so relieves the makers of Happy Fun Ball, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.

Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an unknown glowing substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.

Happy Fun Ball has been shipped to our troops in Saudi Arabia and is also being dropped by our warplanes on Iraq.

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

Happy Fun Ball comes with a lifetime guarantee.

Happy Fun Ball

ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!


18 posted on 06/14/2007 8:11:36 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL

Thanks for posting that! Too funny!


19 posted on 06/14/2007 8:34:14 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

just finding that out?


20 posted on 06/14/2007 8:37:01 AM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson