Fredipedia v2.36: The Definitive Fred Thompson Quick Reference
Posted on 06/01/2007 9:21:17 AM PDT by Josh Painter
http://podcasts.nytimes.com/podcasts/2007/06/01/01brooks-pod.mp3
“What Thompson’s campaign represents, then, is a return to basics. It’s not primarily engaged in the issues that have dominated recent G.O.P. politics. Thompson is campaigning to restore America’s constitutional soul. He’s going back to Madison and Jefferson and the decentralized federalism of the founders, at least as channeled through Goldwater. As Thompson himself said while running for Senate, “America’s government is bringing America down, and the only thing that can change that is a return to the basics.”
Thompson thus becomes one pole in the debate now roiling the G.O.P. Nobody is running as the continuation of Bush. The big question now is: should the party go back to the basics or should it jump forward and transform itself into something new? Thompson articulates the back-to-basics view in its purest form. Newt Gingrich articulates the transformational view in its purest form. The other candidates are a mishmash in between.
If I were a political consultant I would tell my candidate to play up Thompson’s back-to-basics theme. This is a traumatized party, not in the mood for anything risky and new. But over the long run, back to basics is no solution because it doesn’t produce a positive agenda for today’s problems.
Fred Thompson’s political skills are as good as anybody now running, but his challenge is going to be building a concrete agenda on his anti-Washington message. It will be translating his Goldwater risorgimento philosophy into policies on energy, health care reform, Islamic extremism and education. For if there is one thing the last 30 years have taught us, it is that campaigns that are strictly anti-Washington do not command 50 percent of the vote because they don’t address the decentralized global challenges that now face us.
Perhaps what the G.O.P. needs is Newt Gingrich’s brain lodged in Fred Thompson’s temperament.”
(Excerpt) Read the full text at http://iraqwarit.blogspot.com/2007/05/back-to-basics-with-fred.html
Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
Please FReepmail jellybean if you want on/off this list. WARNING: This ping list is EXTREMELY active.
I prefer Fred’s brain in Fred’s temperament, thank you.
Even the name, Fred, is reassuring. A plain old american name.
In the 1850s the Whig Party split and died a miserable death over the slavery issue.
The Republican party was born and came to power a few years later.
Today’s Republican Party is in danger of repeating that Whig history on the illegal Mexican squatter issue.
The party needs a figure strong enough and principled enough to return it to its federalist, law and order, strong military roots
If not it will die.....and should.
IMHO, only Fred thompson has the priciples, stature, communication skills and the AUTHENTICITY to accomplish that.
Is Newt still off on his green thing tangent, or is he seriously analyzing the actual affect of this carbon noise upon the whole population. We know the left has fully embraced the green religion. But what about the rest of us...
So you want to give Fred Thompson the brain of an ecotard?
Nope.
I'm behind Senator Thompson all the way.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Eternity Road
I am giving you freepers another chance! I stopped visting freerepublic after the 2004 election, but now I am back. That said, I am reading the same tripe here:
Perhaps what the G.O.P. needs is Newt Gingrich’s brain lodged in Fred Thompson’s temperament.”
NEWT GINGRICH HAS NO CHANCE OF GETTING ELECTED TO ANYTHING ANYMORE.
Will he just go away! All he does make people hate us!
Thompson 2008!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.