Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD

She is already excommunicated, she just hasn’t been the subject of a formal declaration. Maybe what she means is that no priest has ever denied her Communion. I hope that’s not true; I hope that no priest has ever knowingly given Communion to this evil woman and no bishop has ever knowingly permitted his priests to give her Communion.


3 posted on 05/24/2007 2:29:58 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: livius

HE11 They gave Communion to the Predator Clinton! That made my blood boil!


6 posted on 05/24/2007 4:06:23 AM PDT by noname07718
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: livius

Perhaps that’s what she’s saying; the Church states that she’s excommunicated yet they won’t formally declare it nor will they deny her communion. So then what is the value of excommunication?


10 posted on 05/24/2007 4:43:18 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: livius; HarleyD
She is already excommunicated, she just hasn’t been the subject of a formal declaration. Maybe what she means is that no priest has ever denied her Communion.

I suspect you could say the same about a Roman Catholic Church on Oral Contraception.

I suspect the Muslims in America would outnumber RC women of childbearing age who aren't "excommunicated."

20 posted on 05/24/2007 5:13:04 AM PDT by Gamecock (FR Member Gamecock: Declared Anathema By The Council Of Trent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson