Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trial date set for John Ford corruption case
Memphis Commercial Appeal ^ | 5/3/7 | Richard Locker

Posted on 05/03/2007 1:47:01 PM PDT by SmithL

NASHVILLE – Former state senator John Ford will go on trial on federal public corruption charges in Nashville Sept. 18 – a month and a half after his scheduled July 31 sentencing in Memphis for his bribery conviction there last month.

U.S. District Court Judge Todd J. Campbell set the trial date during a 10-minute status conference today. Ford appeared for but did not speak during the brief hearing. Afterward, he exchanged pleasantries with reporters about his 65th birthday today but said nothing of substance about his case.

Federal public defender Henry Martin said neither he nor Ford would have any comment when they were asked whether Ford intended to seek a plea bargain in the Nashville case.

"Trust me, I’m doing OK," Ford said.

The trial is expected to take at least three weeks. Prosecutors said it will likely take them seven to 10 days to present their case, and Martin said the defense is "looking at putting on witnesses that could take several days."

"It appears to be a complex and lengthy trial," Judge Campbell said.

Ford remains free on bond after reporting into the U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services offices after his courtroom appearance.

A federal grand jury in December charged Ford with two counts of wire fraud and four counts of concealing his financial ties to two different TennCare contractors. He has pleaded innocent of the charges.

The case is separate from the trial he faced in Memphis as part of an undercover FBI sting in which the FBI set up a fake company wanting to recycle state government’s old computers and paid Ford $55,000 to help with a bill to help the company win the business.

The Nashville case involves Ford’s work for Doral Dental Services and Omnicare (now United American Health Care) from 2001 to 2005 while serving as a state senator. Ford has acknowledged consulting work for the two firms but contends it was not illegal.

The indictment outlines work Ford did to help Doral win TennCare’s sole contract to provide dental services to TennCare enrollees and work he did on behalf of Omnicare to increase the number of enrollees assigned to the company, which boosted its fees.

The federal indictment says Ford received more than $400,000 from each of the two contractors during the four years he worked with them.

The potential punishment if he is found guilty here is up to 20 years in prison on each of the wire-fraud counts, up to five years on each of the concealment charges, and a fine of up to $250,000 on each.

He faces a potential sentence of 46 to 57 months for the Memphis conviction.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: caseofthemissingd; cultureofcorruption; democrat; democratscandals; ford; mediabias; memphis; ratcrime; yourtaxdollarsatwork
This is on top of last week's conviction: Ford convicted on bribery charge; deadlocked on extortion
1 posted on 05/03/2007 1:47:04 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL; windcliff
If he gets a jury of his peers will it consist of 12 crooked politicians?
2 posted on 05/03/2007 1:48:32 PM PDT by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat; OrangeDaisy; GailA; mariabush; eyedigress; gov_bean_ counter; EGPWS

Well, they proved that they could convict a Ford in Memphis, let’s see if they can follow-through.


3 posted on 05/03/2007 1:50:47 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I guess the Fords aren’t “Walkin in Memphis” anymore. HAHAHA!!!1


4 posted on 05/03/2007 1:54:42 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Is Bowers next in Memphis?


5 posted on 05/03/2007 2:14:29 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“Federal public defender Henry Martin said neither he nor Ford would have any comment”

The comment I would like...is why were paying for his defense when he appears to be anything but indigent.


6 posted on 05/03/2007 2:16:42 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (Nobles Oblige, BS, Well take care of it ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist

My exact question. Why a public defender?


7 posted on 05/03/2007 3:11:56 PM PDT by billhilly (My former tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Federal Public Defender???? Why are the taxpayers paying for his defense?


8 posted on 05/03/2007 4:03:25 PM PDT by BamaAndy (Professor Librescu is an American hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist; billhilly; BamaAndy
Public Defender?

Your tax dollars at work.

9 posted on 05/03/2007 4:17:30 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“Your tax dollars at work”

For once I prefer the WPA.


10 posted on 05/03/2007 5:11:57 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (Nobles Oblige, BS, Well take care of it ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson