Wow, you finally get it. This is the strongest argument. However, if you are still not getting it, and you didn’t read the information I sent you.....it’s a waste of time fooling with a rookie disinformation troll.
Just for fun, check out which one are you? :)) or, you must be a speed reader, ignorning tons of research from both sides...however, you come back with this post. lolol.. You give yourself away....
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Propaganda_techniques
Funny you should mention research. No one at the Discovery Institute ever claims that any actual research is being done, or even what it would mean to conduct research into intelligent design.
To do so you would have to hypothesize some characteristics of the designer and his methods, limitations, motives, and so forth.
It's true, I haven't read every word on the subject. I also haven't read the Communist Manifesto or the collected speeches of Fidel Castro.
I take my clues from how ID proponents behaves when they have the opportunity to make a public splash, as at the Dover trial. Having worked for years to get intelligent design into court, the proponents were unable to muster any arguments or produce any research results at all. A shame.
I also take my clues from how people like you behave when I ask for simple examples of things they have claimed, such as a list of things that have missed evolution's train, or even a definition of what you mean by the phrase.
If you wish to argue biology from a religious perspective, I'll have to bail out. If you wish to do a victory dance, please take the opportunity. I only dropped in to ask a question.