Funny you should mention research. No one at the Discovery Institute ever claims that any actual research is being done, or even what it would mean to conduct research into intelligent design.
To do so you would have to hypothesize some characteristics of the designer and his methods, limitations, motives, and so forth.
It's true, I haven't read every word on the subject. I also haven't read the Communist Manifesto or the collected speeches of Fidel Castro.
I take my clues from how ID proponents behaves when they have the opportunity to make a public splash, as at the Dover trial. Having worked for years to get intelligent design into court, the proponents were unable to muster any arguments or produce any research results at all. A shame.
I also take my clues from how people like you behave when I ask for simple examples of things they have claimed, such as a list of things that have missed evolution's train, or even a definition of what you mean by the phrase.
“I also take my clues from how people like you behave when I ask for simple examples of things they have claimed, such as a list of things that have missed evolution’s train, or even a definition of what you mean by the phrase.”
*** I see that you made it to Evol 103 now....look for any holes in the logic, if none are found, make some whether they exist or not. Always stay on the offensive, never answer questions direct or allow the other side to maintain any momentum, and if they do, revert back to any simple question to divert. lolol..:) Repeat and replay words back offering vague responses and then go back on the offensive.
I see that you are now on the method of reflecting back to behavior which most always results in the opponent responding with justifications and defending themselves thus creating another diversion. You take you clues not from how ID folks behave, but how they respond to give you some idea of how to sell your snake oil.
You state that ID folks were not able to produce research results. Well, personal and primary eyewitness testimony beats scientific and statistical research any day. Science hasn’t really gotten it right yet. As a matter of Fact, Dr. Hugh Ross explains the “science” that God designed in the first place in how the world works.
When one misses a train...since you aren’t aware of the situation....they don’t get a seat, they are literally left behind as the trains pulls out. So, the same analogy could be used when you missed the school bus and were late for classes, made yor mama angry, made the teacher angry, because you knew when the bus left but you lagged behind anyway....:)) Funny thing you mention that....being “left Behind”.....will be a sad day for you then for sure. In any case, for your reading pleasure or displeasure whichever....
http://www.evolution-facts.org/Downloads/Evolution%20CruncherP.pdf