Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sweet Solution for Chromium Pollution
ScienceNOW Daily News ^ | 29 March 2007 | Phil Berardelli

Posted on 04/09/2007 10:38:26 PM PDT by neverdem

Researchers may have found a sugar-coated answer to a toxic waste problem. At a presentation yesterday at the semiannual meeting of the American Chemical Society in Chicago, Illinois, a team of chemists reported that a sugar-based solution effectively reduced the threat of the heavy metal chromium, without creating new pollution headaches in the process.

Chromium, like some of its chemical cousins, can be either beneficial or harmful to living things, depending on its form, concentration, and method of absorption. Chromium III, for example, the metal's natural state, is stable and an essential nutrient. On the other hand, hexavalent chromium--or Cr(VI)--is highly reactive and a potential carcinogen if inhaled or consumed in contaminated fish or polluted water. Used in the manufacturing of videotapes, dyes, paints, and other industrial applications, Cr(VI) achieved notoriety several years ago as the subject of a well-publicized class-action lawsuit in California, which was depicted in the movie Erin Brockovich. Up to now, removing Cr(VI) from the environment has been difficult and messy, requiring treatment with acid and other strong reducing agents, which also can degrade local water quality.

The new approach involves solutions of two common sugars, fructose and sucrose. Chemist and lead researcher Bryan Bilyeu of Xavier University of Louisiana in New Orleans reported that the fructose mix removed 94% of Cr(VI) from contaminated wastewater (sucrose achieved a 93% removal) and soil samples in the lab. Based on these "very preliminary" results, he says chromium-using industries might eventually treat their wastewater with sugar solutions to convert enough Cr(VI) into Cr(III)--which is about 1000 times less toxic--to meet or exceed environmental requirements. And instead of the acid-disposal problems that exist with current chromium treatment methods, he notes, the waste sugars would pose no hazard.

Bilyeu says he and his colleagues at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México in Toluca are also studying how to filter wastewater through processed orange peels, cactus, and other natural fibers. He says this method would remove most of the chromium from the effluent, instead of discharging it in a less toxic form. Sugar solutions might even be able to treat contamination by other heavy metals, such as cadmium or copper, Bilyeu adds, but his team hasn't yet investigated those possibilities.

The chromium-contaminated water treatment strategy makes sense, says soil chemist Paul Schwab of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. But it might find only limited success in treating contaminated soils, he notes, because the sugar solutions would tend to wash the chromium away, instead of retaining it and converting it to Cr(III).

Related sites



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: brockovich; chemistry; chromium; pollution; reducingsugar; science; waste
Reducing sugar

Genesis of hexavalent chromium from natural sources in soil and groundwater

Organic poison

Scientists tracking toxic chemicals in California and French Polynesia have made a disturbing discovery: Hexavalent chromium, a carcinogen once thought to be the exclusive product of industrial activity, apparently can form naturally in groundwater. All it takes is nontoxic, conventional chromium coming into contact with certain minerals containing manganese. In research appearing online the week of 9 April in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists report the first detection of hexavalent chromium concentrations in soil samples in a nonindustrial setting. One positive note: The researchers also found that enzymes in soil bacteria can neutralize the harmful metal. (Photo: Christopher Oze, Dennis K. Bird, and Scott Fendorf)

1 posted on 04/09/2007 10:38:28 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the info.


2 posted on 04/09/2007 10:45:41 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (There once was a dream called "Hippy Beat Down." The mere whisper of it made officers smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is just so 20th century. What about carbon? Are the any carbon credits to sell here?Paging Algore, paging Algore.


3 posted on 04/09/2007 10:51:03 PM PDT by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We’ll leave it to the government to mandate overproduction of cacti to assure significant supply of alternative natural fiber for filtering. “Worked” with corn for ethanol.


4 posted on 04/10/2007 12:32:40 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Great news! As to the naturally occurring CR(VI)... That’s to be expected. i.e. If humans can make a chemical compound, so can nature. If the sugar treatments work in practice, then we can at least alleviate the CR(VI) we make.
5 posted on 04/10/2007 7:04:02 AM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson