Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fitzgerald's Cover-up
Wall Street Journal ^ | 4-4-07 | Editorial

Posted on 04/03/2007 9:36:19 PM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2007 9:36:20 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

ping


2 posted on 04/03/2007 9:40:37 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Congress also has an interest now that it is contemplating a "shield law" to protect media sources

Congress should not pass such a law. The media already has way too much power and way too little accountability.

3 posted on 04/03/2007 9:54:41 PM PDT by Wolfstar (When you whip the good guys into rage at the wrong enemy, don't be surprised when the bad guys win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Is Fitzgerald throwing sand in our eyes?


4 posted on 04/03/2007 10:00:19 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Since Fitzgerald knew the answer to the question he was supposed to investigate on the first day of his investigation, you have to wonder what he was doing at public expense for 3 years.

What was he investigating?

I think he should be held accountable.


5 posted on 04/03/2007 10:10:43 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Since I’m confident that Fitzy will be running as a (D) for some high elective office in the near future (largely based on his “courageous” prosecution of Libby), this is probably as good a time as any to expose his “prosecutorial philosophy” in the Libby case.


6 posted on 04/03/2007 10:55:00 PM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie
I think President Bush picked him so I believe he is a Republican. Although I guess you could be right because when President Clinton was investigated that Ken Starr was Republican for a democratic investigation so anything is possible. Both of them did not do a great job and I think they should do away with special prosecutors.
7 posted on 04/03/2007 11:01:00 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Fitzgerald should be disbarred for NOT calling a mistrial for no crime was committed and he knew it.. from the beginning..


8 posted on 04/03/2007 11:06:39 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Bump for later...


9 posted on 04/03/2007 11:10:00 PM PDT by tubebender (Whom keeps stealing my Tag Line???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Fitgerald is not a Republican and President Bush did not “pick him”. He was “picked” and given extension of “broad discretion” of power by his pal James Comey (D) who after only 3 weeks as Deputy AG asked John Ashcroft to recuse himself from Plamegate. Fitzgerald is a godfather to Comey’s son. Comey also refused to certify key parts of NSA’s anti-terrorism “phone-listening” program, and was a possible “leaker” of the program - he resigned from DoJ shortly after the election of 2004 to become Lockheed-Martin General Counsel.

Starr was grilled incessantly on the Hill to account for the time he spent during all Clintons’ crimes he was investigating. No such oversight from then-GOP Congress was done about Fitzgerald entrapment expedition.


10 posted on 04/03/2007 11:36:41 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar; woofie
I have absolutely no problem what Fitz did with reporters, which is why courts decided that they do not have the privilege of keeping the names of the "sources" secret in certain investigations (particularly concerning national security).

I do believe that Fitz is trying to keep these documents secret because he lied to the courts about the reasons for necessity of their testimonies, and misinforming and misleading the court about the "classification" of one Valerie Plame, sine qua non of his "investigation".

11 posted on 04/03/2007 11:43:33 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie
The Libby trial was a distraction from his full-time job of prosecuting political corruption in the Chicago area. I think he got tangled up in the "crime fighter" mode of being a special prosecutor. And when he found out so soon what actually happened, he must have thought it was too easy, so he better keep looking.

Patrick Fitzgerald will go into the history books as a symptom of what is wrong with American government during this era; the ability to print money to cover real debt, mingled with the ability to convince ourselves that more government is good, regardless of the cost; the kids can pay off the debt.

12 posted on 04/03/2007 11:51:27 PM PDT by Bernard (The price used to be 30 pieces of silver; now it's a spinach subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marron

Agreed.


13 posted on 04/04/2007 12:24:58 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY (QMC(SW) Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

I did not know about the personal relationship of the Fitzgerald-Comey connection. Thanks!


14 posted on 04/04/2007 12:55:02 AM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Ken Starr did a fine job. He put many of Mr and Mrs Clintons criminal partners in jail. Ask Guy Tucker. Ask Jim McDougal. Ask Web Hubbel.....

But then he had the unfortunate luck of having Mr and Mrs Clintons abused women drop Rape and Sexual harassment charges, and witness tampering in his lap.

Team Clinton made sure it wasnt just the Blue dress that got smeared.

15 posted on 04/04/2007 3:13:55 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
I have absolutely no problem what Fitz did with reporters,

I have no proablem with reporters having to testify. But I find it interesting that Congress wants to protect reporters while not giving the President the same protection. They want everyone he talks to be under oath.

16 posted on 04/04/2007 3:19:43 AM PDT by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; the Real fifi

FREE SCOOTER Ping


17 posted on 04/04/2007 3:40:08 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marron
“what he was doing at public expense for 3 years?”

“Goldbricking” while laughing all the way to the bank!

And if anyone expects a ‘Rat controlled Congress to make Fitzgerald accountable; I have some beachfront property in AZ for sale.

18 posted on 04/04/2007 5:41:16 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marron

Agree. Fitzgerald is Mike Nifong in a different suit.


19 posted on 04/04/2007 5:47:43 AM PDT by sauropod ("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
Agreed. Reporters should be treated no differently than anyone else in the eyes of the law. To grant them special status mocks America's committment to equal justice.
20 posted on 04/04/2007 7:03:32 AM PDT by smoothsailing ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction"--President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson