Skip to comments.
Fitzgerald's Cover-up
Wall Street Journal ^
| 4-4-07
| Editorial
Posted on 04/03/2007 9:36:19 PM PDT by smoothsailing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: STARWISE
2
posted on
04/03/2007 9:40:37 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: smoothsailing
Congress also has an interest now that it is contemplating a "shield law" to protect media sourcesCongress should not pass such a law. The media already has way too much power and way too little accountability.
3
posted on
04/03/2007 9:54:41 PM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(When you whip the good guys into rage at the wrong enemy, don't be surprised when the bad guys win.)
To: smoothsailing
Is Fitzgerald throwing sand in our eyes?
4
posted on
04/03/2007 10:00:19 PM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: smoothsailing
Since Fitzgerald knew the answer to the question he was supposed to investigate on the first day of his investigation, you have to wonder what he was doing at public expense for 3 years.
What was he investigating?
I think he should be held accountable.
5
posted on
04/03/2007 10:10:43 PM PDT
by
marron
To: smoothsailing
Since I’m confident that Fitzy will be running as a (D) for some high elective office in the near future (largely based on his “courageous” prosecution of Libby), this is probably as good a time as any to expose his “prosecutorial philosophy” in the Libby case.
6
posted on
04/03/2007 10:55:00 PM PDT
by
pawdoggie
To: pawdoggie
I think President Bush picked him so I believe he is a Republican. Although I guess you could be right because when President Clinton was investigated that Ken Starr was Republican for a democratic investigation so anything is possible. Both of them did not do a great job and I think they should do away with special prosecutors.
To: smoothsailing
Fitzgerald should be disbarred for NOT calling a mistrial for no crime was committed and he knew it.. from the beginning..
8
posted on
04/03/2007 11:06:39 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: smoothsailing
9
posted on
04/03/2007 11:10:00 PM PDT
by
tubebender
(Whom keeps stealing my Tag Line???)
To: napscoordinator
Fitgerald is not a Republican and President Bush did not “pick him”. He was “picked” and given extension of “broad discretion” of power by his pal James Comey (D) who after only 3 weeks as Deputy AG asked John Ashcroft to recuse himself from Plamegate. Fitzgerald is a godfather to Comey’s son. Comey also refused to certify key parts of NSA’s anti-terrorism “phone-listening” program, and was a possible “leaker” of the program - he resigned from DoJ shortly after the election of 2004 to become Lockheed-Martin General Counsel.
Starr was grilled incessantly on the Hill to account for the time he spent during all Clintons’ crimes he was investigating. No such oversight from then-GOP Congress was done about Fitzgerald entrapment expedition.
10
posted on
04/03/2007 11:36:41 PM PDT
by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: Wolfstar; woofie
I have absolutely no problem what Fitz did with reporters, which is why courts decided that they do not have the privilege of keeping the names of the "sources" secret in certain investigations (particularly concerning national security).
I do believe that Fitz is trying to keep these documents secret because he lied to the courts about the reasons for necessity of their testimonies, and misinforming and misleading the court about the "classification" of one Valerie Plame, sine qua non of his "investigation".
11
posted on
04/03/2007 11:43:33 PM PDT
by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: pawdoggie
The Libby trial was a distraction from his full-time job of prosecuting political corruption in the Chicago area. I think he got tangled up in the "crime fighter" mode of being a special prosecutor. And when he found out so soon what actually happened, he must have thought it was too easy, so he better keep looking.
Patrick Fitzgerald will go into the history books as a symptom of what is wrong with American government during this era; the ability to print money to cover real debt, mingled with the ability to convince ourselves that more government is good, regardless of the cost; the kids can pay off the debt.
12
posted on
04/03/2007 11:51:27 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(The price used to be 30 pieces of silver; now it's a spinach subsidy.)
To: marron
13
posted on
04/04/2007 12:24:58 AM PDT
by
GATOR NAVY
(QMC(SW) Ret.)
To: CutePuppy
I did not know about the personal relationship of the Fitzgerald-Comey connection. Thanks!
To: napscoordinator
Ken Starr did a fine job. He put many of Mr and Mrs Clintons criminal partners in jail. Ask Guy Tucker. Ask Jim McDougal. Ask Web Hubbel.....
But then he had the unfortunate luck of having Mr and Mrs Clintons abused women drop Rape and Sexual harassment charges, and witness tampering in his lap.
Team Clinton made sure it wasnt just the Blue dress that got smeared.
15
posted on
04/04/2007 3:13:55 AM PDT
by
PA-RIVER
To: CutePuppy
I have absolutely no problem what Fitz did with reporters, I have no proablem with reporters having to testify. But I find it interesting that Congress wants to protect reporters while not giving the President the same protection. They want everyone he talks to be under oath.
16
posted on
04/04/2007 3:19:43 AM PDT
by
patj
To: Howlin; the Real fifi
17
posted on
04/04/2007 3:40:08 AM PDT
by
Laverne
To: marron
“what he was doing at public expense for 3 years?”
“Goldbricking” while laughing all the way to the bank!
And if anyone expects a ‘Rat controlled Congress to make Fitzgerald accountable; I have some beachfront property in AZ for sale.
18
posted on
04/04/2007 5:41:16 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: marron
Agree. Fitzgerald is Mike Nifong in a different suit.
19
posted on
04/04/2007 5:47:43 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
To: Wolfstar
Agreed. Reporters should be treated no differently than anyone else in the eyes of the law. To grant them special status mocks America's committment to equal justice.
20
posted on
04/04/2007 7:03:32 AM PDT
by
smoothsailing
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction"--President Ronald Reagan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson