To: smoothsailing
Congress also has an interest now that it is contemplating a "shield law" to protect media sourcesCongress should not pass such a law. The media already has way too much power and way too little accountability.
3 posted on
04/03/2007 9:54:41 PM PDT by
Wolfstar
(When you whip the good guys into rage at the wrong enemy, don't be surprised when the bad guys win.)
To: Wolfstar; woofie
I have absolutely no problem what Fitz did with reporters, which is why courts decided that they do not have the privilege of keeping the names of the "sources" secret in certain investigations (particularly concerning national security).
I do believe that Fitz is trying to keep these documents secret because he lied to the courts about the reasons for necessity of their testimonies, and misinforming and misleading the court about the "classification" of one Valerie Plame, sine qua non of his "investigation".
11 posted on
04/03/2007 11:43:33 PM PDT by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: Wolfstar
Agreed. Reporters should be treated no differently than anyone else in the eyes of the law. To grant them special status mocks America's committment to equal justice.
20 posted on
04/04/2007 7:03:32 AM PDT by
smoothsailing
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction"--President Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson