Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton denounces Halliburton's move [we won't be able to pursue these investigations?"......]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 03/12/2007 2:49:34 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Clinton denounces Halliburton's move

By JOE STINEBAKER, Associated Press Writer 47 minutes ago

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton on Monday denounced oil giant Halliburton's planned relocation to Dubai.

"I think it raises a lot of very big concerns and we're going to be looking into it in Washington," the New York senator said at a news conference in the Bronx. "I think it's disgraceful that American companies are more than happy to try to get no-bid contracts like Halliburton has, and then turn around and say, 'You know, we're not going to stay.'"

On Saturday, Halliburton CEO Dave Lesar announced that the conglomerate's headquarters would move from Houston to Dubai, a booming city in the United Arab Emirates known for its liberal tax and residency laws. Lesar said the company's business was now largely based in the Middle East and Asia.

Halliburton, which was headed by Vice President Dick Cheney from 1995-2000, received several lucrative no-bid government contracts to manage the reconstruction of Iraq following the U.S.-led invasion there. Last month, federal investigators alleged Halliburton was responsible for $2.7 billion of the $10 billion in contractor waste and overcharging in Iraq.

In 2006, Halliburton earned profits of $2.3 billion on revenues of $22.6 billion.

"We have a lot of evidence about their misuse of government contracts and how they have cheated the American soldier, cheated the American taxpayer, they have taken money and not provided the services," said Clinton, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. "So, does moving overseas mean that we won't be able to pursue these investigations?"

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
socialist........
1 posted on 03/12/2007 2:49:37 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Marxist


2 posted on 03/12/2007 2:50:33 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ahhhh....Hillary Chavez Clinton!!!


3 posted on 03/12/2007 2:50:59 PM PDT by Dallas59 (AL GORE STALKED ME ON 2/25/2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Because Halliburton has been so welcomed in our country up until now...


4 posted on 03/12/2007 2:51:03 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Tough beans, witchy-poo!


5 posted on 03/12/2007 2:51:47 PM PDT by airborne (Rudy is nothing but a donkey in an elephant suit! HUNTER 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How many faces is that broad broad talking out of now?


6 posted on 03/12/2007 2:51:50 PM PDT by Jaded ("I have a mustard- seed; and I am not afraid to use it."- Joseph Ratzinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Dear Hillary;

Up Yours.

Sincerely,

justshutupandtakeit (though no sane man would want to give it to you.)


7 posted on 03/12/2007 2:52:38 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why would Haliburton want to stay?


8 posted on 03/12/2007 2:52:59 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Religious Zealot from the Right Wing Church of Hate...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; snugs; All

HA HA that funniest as hell LMAO

Gee Senator Clinton maybe reason why is because of Demos witchhunt on Halibteron because you are jealous that certain VP was employee of that company


9 posted on 03/12/2007 2:53:09 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Didn't the Clinton Administration give no-bid contracts to Halliburton?


10 posted on 03/12/2007 2:53:59 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I think it raises a lot of very big concerns and we're going to be looking into it in Washington
The whiney Left will not permit anything that Haliburton does to be acceptable. Worse than that, Hillary is just vile. That's the only word for her. She sounds so self-important--which, of course, she is.
11 posted on 03/12/2007 2:54:33 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Run, Fred, run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Some one should tell her that Halliburton is smart enough to know her "I'd take those profits..." comments aren't only gonna apply to Big Oil, but to every one else if she gets in the WH.


12 posted on 03/12/2007 2:54:41 PM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
So if Halliburton moves to Dubai, will they also be prohibited from doing business with the US Government (ala Dubai Ports).

The Libs should be happy they are moving....

13 posted on 03/12/2007 2:55:17 PM PDT by llevrok (When there are more illegals than US citizens, can we open casinos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
With Soros being now the major stockholder in Halliburton, this might drive even a bigger wedge between Clinton and Soros.
14 posted on 03/12/2007 2:55:23 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I have read that Halliburton received plenty of no-bid contracts from the Clinton administration. They were the only company cabable of doing certain jobs.


15 posted on 03/12/2007 2:55:34 PM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Maybe the governemtn should not "allow" it hilliary? Maybe we should "take" their profits and use them for something better than they would (like paying their stockholders or investing in new technologies)
16 posted on 03/12/2007 2:55:39 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist

yep


17 posted on 03/12/2007 2:56:06 PM PDT by Sub-Driver (Proud member of the Republican wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What a load of horse puckey. Halliburton will still be registered as an American company and will be subject to American law.

Hillary knows this but is feigning ignorence in order to further demonize Halliburton


18 posted on 03/12/2007 2:56:51 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar of the Masses Could be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

HALLIBURTON IS NOT AN OIL COMPANY...THEY ARE A WELL-SERVICE COMPANY!!!!

BIG DIFFERENCE!


19 posted on 03/12/2007 2:59:48 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

As if Halliburton gives a flying fig what Shrillary thinks.


20 posted on 03/12/2007 3:01:00 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson