Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plutarch

Solly cholly, DH is not a protectionist. He's for 2 things in that regard. Busting China's balls for cheating on trade (they tariff us unfairly), and not joining organizations that have sovereignty over US trade agreements. Pretty wise. Htis is no Pat Buchanan.

HE IS A REAGAN FREE TRADER WHO DOES NOT WANT TO GIVE THE COMMIES IN CHINA AN UPPER HAND.


42 posted on 02/28/2007 1:28:05 PM PST by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: pissant
DH is not a protectionist...[and] is no Pat Buchanan.

When a politician says he is for "fair trade," obtains financial support from Buchanan and Nader supporting protectionist Roger Milliken , but claims not to be "protectionst," it has all the credibility of a politician who wants to provide a "path to citizenship", gets donations from Tyson Chicken, but claims to be against "amnesty".

56 posted on 02/28/2007 1:51:07 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson