When a politician says he is for "fair trade," obtains financial support from Buchanan and Nader supporting protectionist Roger Milliken , but claims not to be "protectionst," it has all the credibility of a politician who wants to provide a "path to citizenship", gets donations from Tyson Chicken, but claims to be against "amnesty".
Then you better brush up on Hunters history on trade as well as his recent legislation and statements.
Reaganism, baby, no matter how you try to misrepresent it.
Not only that, but I went to a meeting with Duncan Hunter yesterday. I asked him about this same question; he is for genuine free trade with a two-way street, instead of a one-way street where other countries have a one-way edge over us from the beginning (if he were a protectionist, he wouldn’t have voted for a free trade deal with Austrailia).