Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia - 2007 Update
The rRsing Sea Dragon in Asia Web Site ^ | 24 February 2007 | Jeff Head

Posted on 02/24/2007 7:24:58 PM PST by Jeff Head

THE RISING SEA DRAGON IN ASIA - 2007 UPDATE
By Jeff Head - Last Update: February 24, 2007




Throughout 2006 and into 2007 the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has continued its unprecedented modernization and buildup, adding two entirely new classes of major combatant warships to its inventory, along with the other twelve new classes they have been working on. Large numbers of new guided missile destroyers, guided missile frigates, fast attack craft, very modern and quiet diesel/electric attack submarines, nuclear attack submarines, nuclear ballistic missile submarines, logisitic support craft, amphibious assault craft, and the infrastructure and aircraft to support them are coming online and being trialed and tested at sea and in the air by the PLAN.

The major new classes include the improved Type 054, or Ma'anshan guided missile frigates (FFG), called the Type 054A. These vessels represent a significant improvment of the first two frigates which had been launched and commissioned earlier. The craft appear to have a larger displacement and include a VLS system for their anti-air missiles. Two of these were built and launched in 2006 and the next two are nearing completion with a fifth and possibly a sixth already under construction. It is clear that these vessels will be produced in significant numbers, perhpas up to 25.




Two new modern and stealthy, Type 054A guided-missile frigates were launched with the 3rd, 4th, and 5th building. More than twenty are projected.

The second new class introduced by the PLAN in 2006 was the Type 071 LPD, amphibious assault vessel. Similar to the US San Antonio Landing Platform Dock (LPD), this vessel is a very modern addition to the PLAN Amphibious fleet. it is thought that another vessel of this class may well be constructed in 2007, perhaps more. Displacing over 20,000 tons and including a well-deck for smaller amphibious assault craft, the vessel is also armed with 4 CIWS and a dual purpose main gun. The potential for an anit-air craft missile system, either VLS or cannister mounted is also included. Two to four helocoptors for air assault will aslo be embarked on the large flight deck.





A new, large LPD amphibious assault vessel, Type 071, was built and launched in 2006 by the PLAN.

Another significant and telling development in 2006 deals with the Aircraft carrier Varyag that has been being worked on and refitted in the Dalian Shipyards for the last three years. In 2006 the Chinese announced a deal with the Russians to acquire up to fifty SU-33 aircraft, which are the navalized and carrier capable versions of the Russian SU-27 aircraft (also in service with the Peeople's Republic. These are the same aircraft employed on the Russian carrier, Kuznetsov, which is the sister ship to the Varyag that, as mentioned, is now in the Chinese naval shipyard. In addition, the zinc chromate covering, which is a primer for a non-skid surface for aircraft on a carrier deck, has now been painted over with what appears to be a final dark grey non-skid surface. Both of these development are clear indications that the PLAN intends to launch and commission the Varyag as an operational Chinese carrier, probably within the next 24-36 months.



Also of particular note the PLAN took possesion of two improved Sovremenny class destroyers purchased from the Russians. These vessels represent the most modern upgrades to the Sovremenny class vessels available and were built entirely new, specifically for the PLAN. The Sovremenny class destroyers were designed by the Russians to operate in conjunction with other naval and air assets to locate and destroy super carriers such as those deployed by the US Navy.




Two new, improved Project 956, Hangzhou guided-missile destroyers been delivered to the PLAN, bringng to four the number of these carrier hunters in service.

Finally, the PLAN commissioned a second new class replenishment ship, the Weishanhu 887, which is the second in the Qiandaohu class. The Qiandaohu 886 was commissioned in 2005. These represent new fleet replenshiment vessels that now join the four other replenishment vessels the PLAN has. The new ship conducted port visits with Chinese DDGs to Pakistan and India in 2006 and this represents a continued move on the PLAN's part toward blue water operations.




The new fleet replenishment vessel, the Weishanhu 887, was commissioned and joined the Qiandaohu 886 in 2006 and was promptly sent on port calls in the same year.

More and more Stealth FAC Type 022s were being built throughout 2006 at multiple shipyards. It is not known exactly how many of these advanced, fast, and stealthy catamaran missile boats have been built, but estimates now range up well over twenty and perhaps as many as thirty. It is estimated that as many as 100 will be built.



Many more stealth catamaran FACs were built during 2006.

In addition, the many other vessels and aircraft spoken of from this site's 2006 PLAN Update, continue to be integrated into PLAN operations ...

By way of reference, in general numbers, over the last five to six years, the PLAN has built and launched over 80 new major surface combatants for its fleet. In that same time period, they have not decommissioned any major surface combatants, meaning they have added 80 major surface combatant vessels to their inventory. In that same period, the US Navy has built 46 new major surface combatants. At the same time, the US Navy has decommissioned 49 major surface combatants, many of them with 10-15 years of service life remaining, meaning a net loss of three major surface combatants in this period.

Clearly the trend shows that the PLAN is rapidly closing the gap between itself and the US Navy, and particualrly when focusing on the Western Pacific, which is where the PLAN is concentrated, this is a trend worthy of watching and considering in future US Navy and other western nation's planning and acquisition schedules.



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chicoms; chinesenavalbuildup; chinesenavy; chinesethreat; dragonsfury; freeperjeffhead; haplessvaryag; plan; planbuildup; redchinathreat; redchinesenavy; redchinesethreat; varyag; worldnavies; worldwariii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
For all those interested and who have been following my work regarding the PLAN.
1 posted on 02/24/2007 7:25:03 PM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...

FYI


2 posted on 02/24/2007 7:25:23 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Speaking for those on the other thread

"it's only a model"

3 posted on 02/24/2007 7:27:34 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ( for those in Rio Linda, there's conservapedia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

bump to your interesting thread Jeff.

Hope you are well!


4 posted on 02/24/2007 7:27:54 PM PST by RobFromGa (I'm still optimistic about our future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

FYI...more info for the threat matrix.


5 posted on 02/24/2007 7:28:30 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks. I wish the US were more eager to spend money on next-generation surface ships. We're gonna need them, but they take years to design and build. The first DDG-1000 Destroyer is supposed to hit the water in 2012, last I heard. That seems far away, but what can you do?


6 posted on 02/24/2007 7:29:32 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks for the ping. When do you sleep?


7 posted on 02/24/2007 7:33:19 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

.


8 posted on 02/24/2007 7:33:40 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Thank you my friend. I am well. The Head Clan is prospering and doing alright. The good Lord is smiling upon us...despite whatever hardships and travail we may otherwise face.

The ongoing buildup of the red Chinese Navy continues to trouble me.

9 posted on 02/24/2007 7:34:28 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Add to that that they are cutting back the total number of DDX vessels to twelve, or as few as eight...and the concern grows. No matter how good they will be, and I have no doubts that they will be good...eight total ships means only 4-6 are deployed at any one time and that few can only cover so many bases.

Continue to write and raise cain with your reps...speak to others and have them do the same. Educate and make others aware. A whole lot of us need to be doing that if we are to make any difference short of abject disasters befalling us and then forcing the change in attitude.

10 posted on 02/24/2007 7:37:29 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

hehehe...not enough.


11 posted on 02/24/2007 7:37:51 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

What about names?

Have the Chinese named a warship the "Walmart" yet?


12 posted on 02/24/2007 7:41:13 PM PST by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
The new frigates are the Ma'anshan class and each will be individually named. Carrier has no official name yet, the LPD has no official name yet. The purchased Russian destroyers are the Hangzhou class and each is individually named. Names are given for the replinishment class.

The other destroyers and major ships are also named.

The FACs, to my knowledge have not been named and are only numbered to this point.

As to Walmart...well, the point is well taken, among other trade activities, our dollars are funding this buildup in a large way.

13 posted on 02/24/2007 7:46:01 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

bump


14 posted on 02/24/2007 7:46:47 PM PST by Non-Sequitur (Proud owner, 10,000th post on the 'Anna Nicole Smith Has Died' thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

It's not Wal-Mart or other retailers that are the problem, per se. The problem is the manufacturers and researchers - Motorola, Intel, Cisco, IBM, Agere, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, GE, Boeing, and many others.


15 posted on 02/24/2007 7:55:15 PM PST by bws53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; ...

BTTT!


16 posted on 02/24/2007 7:56:11 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The Republican primary field SUCKS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Just another trading partner. Nothing to see here...


17 posted on 02/24/2007 7:57:22 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The Republican primary field SUCKS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bws53

All of what you say is true...but they still enjoy profits from our dollars for the many products produced over there...that adds to the whole.


18 posted on 02/24/2007 8:00:36 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Thanks. I wish the US were more eager to spend money on next-generation surface ships. We're gonna need them, but they take years to design and build. The first DDG-1000 Destroyer is supposed to hit the water in 2012, last I heard. That seems far away, but what can you do?

We're still cranking out DDG-51s and they're superior to anything China has now or building.

19 posted on 02/24/2007 8:08:26 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Yes we are...and they are awesome. I thank God each day that they are out there. The latest flight Burkes have the CIWS and the Harpoons removed (when they added the helo hangar, they removed the harpoons from the aft deck). They carry the Standards, the helos, the dual purpose gun, the torpedo tubes, and the Tomohawks. As I understand it, some vessels are getting launch cannisters for the ESSM (Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile) now in place of the CIWS.


20 posted on 02/24/2007 8:34:00 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson