Skip to comments.
National Poll: Giuliani Out Front In Race For White House
NY News ^
| Feb. 22, 2007
| NY News
Posted on 02/21/2007 10:15:17 PM PST by FairOpinion
The former mayor leads Clinton by five percentage points, 48 to 43.
The Republican Giuliani holds a comfortable lead in the red states, topping Clinton by 17 percentage points, and he is even with Clinton in blue states.
Giuliani has strong support among Republican voters, with 40 percent saying they are likely to vote for him.
Arizona Senator John McCain trails with 18 percent, followed by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who has said he may not run if Giuliani holds a commanding lead.
As for the Democrats, Clinton has the support of 38 percent of those polled. Illinois Senator Barack Obama follows with 23 percent and former Vice President Al Gore is third with 11 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at ny1.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; conspiracynuts; duncanhunter; electionpresident; elections; foodforhildabeast; gingrich; giuliani; gungrabbingrino; hillary; hillarysfood; hunter; mccain; newt; obama; pimpinforrudy; poll; pushpolls; rino; rinophilepost; rinopushpoll; rudytherino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-222 next last
Interesting new info: "Newt Gingrich, who has said he may not run if Giuliani holds a commanding lead.".
To: FairOpinion
I might be more willing to accept Giuliani if someone like Gingrich was on the ticket.
2
posted on
02/21/2007 10:17:31 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Support the Republican Study Committee)
To: BunnySlippers; PhiKapMom; B Knotts
Giuliani and Newt PING
"The former mayor leads Clinton by five percentage points, 48 to 43.
... Newt Gingrich, who has said he may not run if Giuliani holds a commanding lead. "
3
posted on
02/21/2007 10:17:47 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: RWR8189
Giuliani/Gingrich?
G2-2008
4
posted on
02/21/2007 10:18:45 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: FairOpinion
Wonderful, Newt... as if Rudy is even as conservative as you are.
5
posted on
02/21/2007 10:19:05 PM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Coming 2008: President Rodham and Senator Bill? Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton? No thanks!)
To: newzjunkey
Newt is a realist.
Other conservatives could learn from him.
6
posted on
02/21/2007 10:20:44 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: RWR8189
I take great delight in seeing McCain's poll number sink.
7
posted on
02/21/2007 10:22:58 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: RWR8189
Newt's negatives are too high. It would just drag Rudy down.
8
posted on
02/21/2007 10:23:22 PM PST
by
Catmom
To: Catmom
Right now it looks like Rudy might carry CA and in that case Hillary is toast.
9
posted on
02/21/2007 10:24:22 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: Blackirish; Jameison; Sabramerican; BunnySlippers; tkathy; veronica; Roccus; Jake The Goose; ...
((((( PING PING PING )))))
THIS IS THE RUDY PING LIST
Let me know if you want on or off
10
posted on
02/21/2007 10:26:11 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(RUDY FOR PRESIDENT 2008)
To: Catmom
I don't know, in most cases it seems VP candidates don't effect the outcome at all.
Edwards sure didn't help Kerry in NC.
Gingrich, or another strong conservative, on the ticket could play sort of the reverse role that the more moderate Bush created on Reagan's ticket in 1980.
11
posted on
02/21/2007 10:26:45 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Support the Republican Study Committee)
To: FairOpinion
Don't you mean creamed chipped beef on toast?
12
posted on
02/21/2007 10:27:12 PM PST
by
Catmom
To: FairOpinion
I conceded myself to a McCain candidacy quite a while ago.
I never though Rudy could catch on. I know its early, but I too take pleasure in seeing McCain implode.
13
posted on
02/21/2007 10:28:29 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Support the Republican Study Committee)
To: FairOpinion
It doesn't sound like a good combo...2 with marital problems in the past. You need someone who is long-married and more conservative to be his running mate, if he gets the nomination (and I hope he does, or Romney).
14
posted on
02/21/2007 10:29:04 PM PST
by
BonnieJ
To: RWR8189
McCain was pushed by the MSM as the "ideal candidate", when in fact, if he had been the R nominee (shudder!), Hillary would have eaten him for lunch -- maybe that's exactly why the MSM was trying to con Republicans into the inevitability of a McC Republican nomination.
15
posted on
02/21/2007 10:31:14 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: FairOpinion
16
posted on
02/21/2007 10:32:32 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: RWR8189
I think that is an excellent idea! That would be a great ticket that will win.
17
posted on
02/21/2007 10:32:41 PM PST
by
avacado
To: RWR8189
Edwards was a foolish choice. VP candidates are usually chosen to deliver a certain state that would otherwise be lost, and/or to "balance" a ticket.
Edwards did neither, and it was obvious that he would do neither. Just another example of how lucky we were to have an idiot like Kerry nominated by the Dems.
18
posted on
02/21/2007 10:32:49 PM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(Boycott all Leftist Media, ignore them and they will go away...)
To: FairOpinion
How about a Giuliani - Hunter ticket? Giuliani's not my top pick but versus the Hildebeast being elected I might have to live with it.
19
posted on
02/21/2007 10:34:26 PM PST
by
Reagan is King
(Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it)
To: Plutarch
Thanks for posting the details.
Duncan Hunter doubled his numbers in the poll!
He went from 1% to 2% -- of course the margin of error of the poll is 2.5%, but "Hunter has real momentum", as some say. ;)
20
posted on
02/21/2007 10:34:56 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: FairOpinion
Well look! Another liberal media poll, polling liberals, showing a liberal leading a liberal! How exciting!
/s
21
posted on
02/21/2007 10:35:10 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: SaxxonWoods
Who is the last VP candidate to deliver a state? LBJ?
Newt, or a well known conservative like him, would obviously be a balance to some socially liberal positions of Giuliani.
22
posted on
02/21/2007 10:36:51 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Support the Republican Study Committee)
To: FairOpinion
The only people funnier than the Ron Paul or Tancredo crowd is people who think Duncan Hunter actually has a shot at the nomination.
23
posted on
02/21/2007 10:38:39 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Support the Republican Study Committee)
To: FairOpinion
Duncan Hunter doubled his numbers in the poll! I will grudgingly admit that the 2% for DH is positive news for him. It doesn't gladden me any to see Romney mired at 7%.
24
posted on
02/21/2007 10:39:12 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: RWR8189
The only people funnier than the Ron Paul or Tancredo crowd is people who think Duncan Hunter actually has a shot at the nomination. The only people sadder than the McCain or Romney people are the people who think them or Giuliani SHOULD get the nomination.
25
posted on
02/21/2007 10:40:28 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: Plutarch
I was kidding.
Should have made my "wink" sign ;) bigger.
26
posted on
02/21/2007 10:40:51 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: Catmom
I agree Newt shouldn't be on the ticket, but he should be in some sort adviser position.
To: FairOpinion
Wow. All of this and there hasn't been a single primary yet. ;-)
28
posted on
02/21/2007 10:42:11 PM PST
by
Allegra
(Hey! Quiet Down Out There!)
To: Plutarch
It doesn't gladden me any to see Romney mired at 7%. No kidding! A guy who saw gay marriage, a ban on "assault weapons" and socialized medicine all instituted on his watch should be getting at least 120% of the Republican vote, don't you think!
/s
29
posted on
02/21/2007 10:42:36 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: EternalVigilance
I haven't made any decisions yet myself.
Its just a fact of life that people like Ron Paul, Tancredo, or Hunter have no shot at the nomination.
30
posted on
02/21/2007 10:42:53 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Support the Republican Study Committee)
To: RWR8189
Could be. Which leaves nary a real Republican to vote for.
31
posted on
02/21/2007 10:44:03 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: zbigreddogz
Newt for Secretary of State?
32
posted on
02/21/2007 10:45:20 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: FairOpinion
Gingrich is just another "New World Order" type. (With more baggage than a Fed Ex freight airplane).
33
posted on
02/21/2007 10:46:00 PM PST
by
BnBlFlag
(Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
To: FairOpinion
Sec. of State requires a bit less of an ego then Newt has. I'd rather see him as Sec. of Education or something related to domestic policy.
Honestly, I think he'd serve best in an unofficial position. Something along the lines of Karl Rove, but having less to do with elections and more to do with policy.
To: BnBlFlag
Do me a favor: Stop using the term "New World Order". It's a meaningless term invented by the Pat Robertson crowd to denounce anything they didn't like.
I mean, really, what does it mean? Can you really say anything concrete about it? Because if you can, you are the first.
To: Catmom
Newt's negatives are too high. It would just drag Rudy down. Exactly, Catmom. bump.
Newt is the only R extant with a Q score lower than hillary's.
For Newt to win, he must run against a toad.... ;)
And has he ever held an executive position?
I don't think women will ever forgive him for what he did to his cancer-ridden wife.
Speaking as a woman, that's a deal-killer...
(along with his feckless method of clinton-confrontation-by-curtseying).
Newt repeatedly and reflexively submits to the clintons when he is supposed to confront them.
Speaking of which,
Newt is resuscitating hillary clinton's moribund health-care credibility even as we debate this.
The two of them are collaborating on some arcane healthcare conceit or other.
36
posted on
02/21/2007 10:49:48 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: FairOpinion
Well I think Romney will win it going away however Rudy would certainly send the extremes of both parties into suicide mode.
Might be worth it for sheer entertainment value.
37
posted on
02/21/2007 10:49:59 PM PST
by
zarf
(Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
To: EternalVigilance
What, you mean your old boss Keys isn't running so you can have a 'real' Republican to vote for?
To: EternalVigilance
EV, the thread is discussing a recently released national poll. Wouldn't it be more apropos for your posts to relate to the thread's subject?
Ask yourself, "Could my post be copied and pasted in to any other thread in which the name "Romney" appears and be just as [in]valid?" If you answer "yes" to that question, then you are doing something called "spam" (which isn't good).
39
posted on
02/21/2007 10:52:33 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: zbigreddogz
Keyes would be far superior to most all in this field.
40
posted on
02/21/2007 10:52:49 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: EternalVigilance
Just wanted to get you on record.
To: Plutarch
You all are discussing meaningless samplings that show little but name ID, almost a year before the first vote will be cast. I've seen the media pollsters miss the mark by more than 30 points in the last month before an election.
And you want to criticize me for wanting to discuss something a bit weightier, like actual issues and the records of the erstwhile participants? Something doesn't quite compute there, sir.
42
posted on
02/21/2007 10:56:04 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: zbigreddogz
Just wanted to get you on record. *snort*
43
posted on
02/21/2007 10:56:45 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: RWR8189
The only people funnier than the Ron Paul or Tancredo crowd is people who think Duncan Hunter actually has a shot at the nomination.
***Hey, humor is just part of the package. Glad to be of service.
44
posted on
02/21/2007 10:58:02 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
To: FairOpinion
"I take great delight in seeing McCain's poll number sink."
Same here.
This joker has frustrated and second guessed the Republican Party and the Bush admintrsation so many times , while pandering to the drive-by media and their description of him as a "maverick", that it feels so damn good to see him suffer right now.
To: zbigreddogz
I mean, really, what does it mean? Can you really say anything concrete about it? Because if you can, you are the first. That's easy. It's shorthand to those who are concerned about the erosion of our national sovereignty and the giving away of our national heritage to a bunch of international bureaucratic gangsters. Do you think that is an irrational fear?
46
posted on
02/21/2007 11:00:36 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: EternalVigilance
*snort* OH!!! So you are in to cocaine!
SO MANY THINGS MAKE SENSE NOW!!!!
To: FairOpinion
Ditto. McCain is finished in D.C., his days of wanting the White House are over. Even the media dismisses him as one word..."OLD".
48
posted on
02/21/2007 11:01:36 PM PST
by
My Favorite Headache
(Liberals : So open-minded....their brains have all fallen out)
To: zbigreddogz
49
posted on
02/21/2007 11:01:52 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The Talented Mr. Romney: It's better to be a fake somebody than a real nobody)
To: EternalVigilance
lol. I knew you'd defend it.
Yes, the fear is largely irrational. Not completely irrational, but largely irrational.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-222 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson