Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leftward, Ho? - The L Word
NY Times ^ | February 18, 2007 | MARK LEIBOVICH

Posted on 02/18/2007 7:26:49 PM PST by neverdem

THESE are balmy days on the American left — genuine, uncharacteristic sunniness unpolluted by some fluky political climate change. There is even talk of a — stutter, clear-throat, perish-thought — liberal resurgence.

Or, treading gingerly, a “liberal moment.”

“Hell, ya, this is a liberal moment,” exults Thomas Frank, author of “What’s the Matter With Kansas?” — and yes, he even calls himself a “liberal” writer, eschewing the sleeker “progressive” stage name that many lefties are preferring these days. He declares this “liberal moment” loud and proud. Until the inevitable qualifier comes.

“A potentially liberal moment,” Mr. Frank says, “assuming that liberal politicians can seize the moment and get beyond their usual plague of incompetence.”

Oh, snap.

--snip--

A Gallup survey last month found that Democrats led Republicans by 34 percent to 31 percent in party affiliation — the largest Democratic advantage since the Clinton administration (34 percent of respondents identified themselves as independents).

By the same token, voters aged 18 to 25 are far more Democratic than previous generations, according to a 2006 survey by Pew Research. And the ratio of Democratic voters who describe themselves as “liberal Democrats” (32 percent) has risen steadily while the share of “conservative Democrats” has dropped (23 percent). Four years earlier, 27 percent of Democrats identified as conservatives, 26 percent as liberals.

The right is seen as divided, demoralized and possibly saddled with a top duo of Republican presidential candidates — John McCain and Rudy Giuliani — who could be unnervingly palatable to moderates and even liberals on certain issues (climate change and campaign finance for Mr. McCain; abortion and gay rights for Mr. Giuliani). A third, Mitt Romney, was just four years ago elected governor of a state — Massachusetts — that many Republicans regard as the political equivalent of a Superfund site.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; democraticparty; healthinsurance; liberal; liberalism; managedcare; socialism

1 posted on 02/18/2007 7:26:51 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Gallup survey last month found that Democrats led Republicans by 34 percent to 31 percent in party affiliation

Can Gallup explain why, they then weight their polls with a 7-10 % favor to Democrats?

2 posted on 02/18/2007 7:36:32 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I'll take "Conservative Slump" for $300.

The source of Liberal(Socialist) success is Conservative failure. The Socialists offer nothing but the same crap with slightly different packaging (Kyoto Protocol, Price Controls, Minimum Wage, Universal Health Care, Windfall Profits Taxes, are wealth redistribution with slightly different labels). The Democrats who are beholden to the Socialists have the same plan of government, rob one class to bribe another class for votes. The only reason the people vote for these Demo-Socialists is that people who are allegedly Conservative fail to carry through with governing like Conservatives.

People want Conservatives to vote for, not Socialists with Rs in front of their names.
3 posted on 02/18/2007 7:46:19 PM PST by Quick or Dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"The right is seen as divided, demoralized and possibly saddled with a top duo of Republican presidential candidates — John McCain and Rudy Giuliani".

The nyt along with the rest of the msm will do its best to see that this comes to pass.
4 posted on 02/18/2007 7:55:04 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"The right is seen as divided, demoralized and possibly saddled..."

That's true, and it is an intential effort by Hillary's girls. Democrat-minded feminists were infiltrating and redirecting Republican discussions during the 1800s. If you want to continue to put up with it, then say goodbye to the last of traditional family and capitalism, folks. Because it is an effort to have Hillary elected.
5 posted on 02/18/2007 8:10:48 PM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

...intentional, even.


6 posted on 02/18/2007 8:11:15 PM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

To quote Crash Davis in Bull Durham: The moment's over.


7 posted on 02/18/2007 8:15:20 PM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
For some reason the words Leftist and Ho seem to go very well together.
8 posted on 02/18/2007 8:25:23 PM PST by Candor7 (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

LOL!


9 posted on 02/18/2007 9:25:31 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Quick or Dead
People want Conservatives to vote for, not Socialists with Rs in front of their names>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yeeeeeehaw!You got that right.

Meanwhile the Washington crowd all think that we conservatives are a bunch of ignorant provincials out here in the hinterlands outside the beltway.

The Repblicans we send to congress are weak, for the most part, and think they need to become more like the Washington Liberal Aristocracy to stay in orifice ( I couldn't help it). Result: RINOs. The RINOS went to one too many liberal cocktail parties, when they should have been going to piggly wiggly and the shootin' range.

10 posted on 02/18/2007 9:44:14 PM PST by Candor7 (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
A third, Mitt Romney, was just four years ago elected governor of a state — Massachusetts — that many Republicans regard as the political equivalent of a Superfund site.

I hate it when the Slimes makes me laugh.

11 posted on 02/18/2007 9:47:08 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("We live in the era of over-reaction." - Sir Alex Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem


I don't care how many of them there are THEY'RE WRONG.


12 posted on 02/18/2007 9:53:42 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It's sad but true that the word "liberal" and the word "traitor" have become essentially synonomous.


13 posted on 02/18/2007 10:06:55 PM PST by Lucas McCain (The gene pool could use a little chlorine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


A Liberal moment??? That must be similar to a 'Senior moment'????


14 posted on 02/18/2007 11:36:56 PM PST by wodinoneeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson