Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

View of U.S.'s Global Role 'Worse'
news.bbc.co.uk ^ | news.bbc.co.uk

Posted on 02/01/2007 8:43:15 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2

The view of the US's role in the world has deteriorated both internationally and domestically, a BBC poll suggests.

The World Service survey, conducted in 25 nations including the US, found that three in four respondents disapproved of how Washington had dealt with Iraq.

The majority of the 26,381 respondents also disapproved of the way five other foreign policy areas had been handled.

Poll findings in more detail

The number of those who said the US was a positive influence in the world fell in 18 nations polled in previous years.

In those countries, 29% of people said the US had a positive influence, down from 36% last year and 40% two years ago.

Across the 25 countries polled, 49% of respondents said the US played a mainly negative role in the world.

In Kenya, Nigeria, the Philippines and the US most of those polled said they thought America had a positive role.

But among Americans, the number of those who viewed their country's role positively fell to 57% - six percentage points down from last year and 14 percentage points down from two years ago.

Mid-East role

Respondents were also asked about the Bush administration's handling of six areas of foreign policy:

The war in Iraq: an average of 73% of respondents disapproved (57% in the US). Disapproval was strongest in Argentina and France, while people in Nigeria, Kenya and the Philippines were more likely to approve.

Detainees in Guantanamo: 67% disapproved (50% in the US). Backing for America on this issue was highest in Nigeria, where 49% approved.

Israeli-Hezbollah war: Washington's role met with approval from respondents in Nigeria and Philippines, but on average 65% disapproved across the 25 countries (50% in the US).

Iran's nuclear programme: again, support for US actions appeared strongest in Kenya (62%), Nigeria (53%) and the Philippines (52%). But, overall 60% of respondents disapproved (50% in the US).

Global warming: more than 80% of respondents in Argentina, France and Germany disapproved compared to 56% overall (54% in the US). But the White House had 50% or more support among those polled in Nigeria, Kenya, the Philippines and South Korea.

North Korea's nuclear programme: opposition to US policy was strongest among respondents in Argentina and Brazil. On average across the 25 countries 54% disapproved (43% in the US).

When asked about US military presence in the Middle East, an average of 68% of respondents across the 25 countries answered that it "provokes more conflict than it prevents".

In Nigeria, 49% of respondents said it was a "stabilising force", as did 41% in the Philippines, 40% in Kenya and 33% in the US.

The poll was conducted for the BBC World Service by GlobeScan and the Program on International Policy Attitudes (Pipa) at the University of Maryland. It has a margin of error ranging from +/-2.5% to +/-4%.

The questions were put to people in: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and the United States.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: allalone; antius; freeworldleader; opinions; yawwwwwn

1 posted on 02/01/2007 8:43:16 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

I would really like to know how the questions and statements were worded. It makes all the difference in the world as to the answers you will get from the respondants, especially if the questions were prefaced by degrading comments about U.S. foreign policies.


2 posted on 02/01/2007 8:46:08 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2 (We not only have a lame duck president, we have a lame duck GOP party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Well Chamberlin had it all worked out with Hitler, and then ...

My guess is the Euro Weanies better worry about their own countries and the radical Muslims who live there. Are they still burning down Paris?

Does anyone care what a bunch of socialists think about anything? They have long since lost the capacity to even defend themselves from common thieves.
3 posted on 02/01/2007 8:46:52 PM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
The World is populated with terrorists and dictators and the French.

I am damn glad the US is making their lives worse.
4 posted on 02/01/2007 8:50:03 PM PST by msnimje (You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Luckily we don't base our national security decisions on the opinions of those in other countries.


5 posted on 02/01/2007 8:50:09 PM PST by frankiep (Beer - the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
The World is populated with terrorists and dictators and the French. I am damn glad the US is making their lives worse.

LOL... you are right! It's not like they're going to be happy if the US pull out their troops from country or region... It's a classic example of "I hate you but I love your money."

6 posted on 02/01/2007 9:21:38 PM PST by paudio (WoT is more important than War on Gay Marriage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Well, what do you expect with Al Gore and John Kerry and a slew of other lefties running around the world calling the US a pariah and other such accusations. Their goal is world socialism, with the US subsidizing the rest of the world.


7 posted on 02/01/2007 9:24:58 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Our international image is being tarnished, but this is not the result of our working toward or helping other nations achieve their freedoms. It becomes stained when we show the world we lack the commitment necessary to help all men achieve the same inalienable rights we claim for ourselves. We lose luster when we as a people abandon courage and give into the easy fashion of defeatism. We lose our souls when political expediency becomes more important than the rise of human dignity.

And besides, who gives a squat what the lazy, fearful, greedy and self-serving think? I don't!

8 posted on 02/01/2007 9:32:52 PM PST by mort56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

Agreed. 26,381 people out of 6,000,000,000 is not exactly a representative sampling;)


9 posted on 02/01/2007 9:44:25 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
The questions were undoubtedly written by a liberal.
10 posted on 02/01/2007 9:47:13 PM PST by NRA2BFree (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008! HE IS AN HONEST CONSERVATIVE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mort56
Hear Hear! Thank you, mort!
11 posted on 02/01/2007 10:23:52 PM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

"The questions were undoubtedly written by a liberal."

What else do you expect from the British Babble Corp..
It is their NPR/PBS.
The same goes for the Guardian. (The NYT of the UK)


12 posted on 02/01/2007 11:24:30 PM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson