Posted on 01/23/2007 8:04:13 AM PST by TexKat
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - A second U.S. aircraft carrier strike group now steaming toward the Middle East is Washington's way of warning Iran to back down in its attempts to dominate the region, a top U.S. diplomat said here Tuesday.
Nicholas Burns, U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs, ruled out direct negotiations with Iran and said a rapprochement between Washington and Tehran was "not possible" until Iran halts uranium enrichment.
"The Middle East isn't a region to be dominated by Iran. The Gulf isn't a body of water to be controlled by Iran. That's why we've seen the United States station two carrier battle groups in the region," Burns said in an address to the Dubai-based Gulf Research Center, an influential think-tank.
"Iran is going to have to understand that the United States will protect its interests if Iran seeks to confront us," Burns continued.
Iran is in a standoff with the West over its defiance of U.N. demands to halt uranium enrichment, which can produce fuel for both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. Iran says its atomic program is aimed solely at generating energy, but the United States and some of its allies suspect it is geared toward making weapons. The U.N. imposed limited sanctions on Iran last month.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said last week that Iran is "ready for anything" in its confrontation with the United States.
Iran conducted missile tests on Monday, the first of five days of military maneuvers southeast of Tehran.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said the U.S. buildup in the Gulf was intended to impress on Iran that the four-year war in Iraq has not made America vulnerable.
The American aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis and several accompanying ships are heading toward the Gulf to join an aircraft carrier group already in the region, the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower. The Stennis is expected to arrive in late February.
The Stennis's arrival in the Middle East will mark the first time since the U.S.-led Iraq invasion in 2003 that the United States has had two carrier battle groups in the region.
The U.S. Navy said Tuesday that the minesweeper USS Gladiator arrived in the Persian Gulf, one of six such ships — four American, two British — now plying the Gulf for anti-ship mines. U.S. officials have long said Iran was likely to block busy Gulf shipping lanes in a conflict.
Some among the audience of Dubai-based diplomats and analysts complained that American wars in the Middle East were already threatening the region's stability and asked Burns to sort out Iraq and the Israel-Palestinian conflict before turning attention to Iran.
"What we are not interested in is another war in the region," Mohammed al-Naqbi, who heads the Gulf Negotiations Center, told Burns. "Iraq is your problem, not the problem of the Arabs. You destroyed a country that had institutions. You handed that country to Iran. Now you are crying to Europe and the Arabs to help you out of this mess."
Burns' speech appeared to respond to similar comments by Iranian officials in Dubai and Bahrain last month. In December, Iran's top national security adviser, Ali Larijani, appealed to Gulf Arabs to shut down American bases on their soil and instead join Iran in a regional security alliance.
Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad in Tehran. The International Atomic Energy Agency said it was discussing with Iran its demand to withdraw some nuclear inspectors but was confident it could continue monitoring the country's nuclear facilities.(AFP/Atta Kenare)
Iran should ignore us. They are fully justified in doing so.
Diplomats are the funniest peoples. .....unintentionally, of course.
.......and asked Burns to sort out ...the Israel-Palestinian conflict before turning attention to Iran.
Taking that advice would put our timetable for dealing with Iran sometime in the next millenium.
are we at war with Iran over Iraq ?
on a lighter note....
I thought I saw somewhere that Ahmadinejad was on of the Munich terrorists, If so shouldn't he have a warrant out for international terrorism ?
"Iran should ignore us. They are fully justified in doing so."
Iran might as well launch against Israel while Israel has sympathetic leadership. It would be like waiting until Hillary is President before launching a war against us.
Couldn't agree more. We have become a nation of Pu.... and wimps. I see that the MSM is just breathless that they have suceeded in getting Bush's numbers to Nixonian levels. Hell 6 years of not stop bashing, lying and distortion will do that.
I guess no war is worth fighting unless we suffer zero casualties, don't upset our enemies and are that we don't disrespect the rights of other cultures to be blood thirsty 6th century savagaes.
I really am losing faith and pride in this country. When our own people don't think it's worth defending, it's not.
What is the U.S doing about Iran's attempted take-over of Lebanon? Are we gonna get invovled there too?
The following link does not relate to this thread http://sacredscoop.com
I don't know if he was involved in the Munich Terrorist attack on the Israeli team.
If he was, I would like to see documentation.
I do know that he was one of the terrorists involved with the hostage situation during Carter's administration
IMO he should have been arrested for that when he visited the USA last year.
That Jersey is wrong....Number 43 belongs to Joe Biden.
He was one of the folks that held the American Embassy
hostage.
If so, the QB lacks the hair plugs, bleached smile, manufactured sincerity, and very plump ego!
Alternatively, it could also be any of 50+ weasels Senators as well.
But it's obvious Number 12 belongs to the 12th Imam.
This a great cartoon with lots of symbolism!
Is he ready for this?
"...asked Burns to sort out Iraq and the Israel-Palestinian conflict before turning attention to Iran."
News Flash!
Turning our attention to Iran IS A KEY ELEMENT in sorting out the Iraq and the Israel-Palestinian conflict!
Defeatest talk -- only Bush knows what he's going to do over the next 2 years.
Isn't the Ronald Reagan carrier battle group supposed to depart San Diego shortly for the Arabian Sea? This would be the third battle group there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.