Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Momaw Nadon
I'd vote for him for any office he cared to run for. The man is brilliant.
3 posted on 11/10/2006 6:54:47 PM PST by Nateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nateman

I'd vote for him for any office he cared to run for. The man is brilliant.
------
Alot of people underestimate the guy. And I say too, show me a potential 2008 runner that is MORE CONSERVATIVE, more articulate, more experienced and NOT A FREAKIN' LIBERAL.


9 posted on 11/10/2006 6:59:14 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman

Agreed.


11 posted on 11/10/2006 7:01:02 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman
I'd vote for him for any office he cared to run for. The man is brilliant.

I would as well. He is very sharp. Unfortunately, the baggage might burden his political hopes.

What I'd like to see is his mind working in the background in the RNC. Perhaps to keep the party tuned to the Reagan/contract-with-America mindset. He's a very good leader, and he's a true conservative.

13 posted on 11/10/2006 7:01:42 PM PST by meyer (Kerry - the voice of true democRAT feelings. Vote them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman

I would too but then there is the baggage...which the media would have a field day with. The left would never vote for him anyway and the conservatives? --


26 posted on 11/10/2006 7:07:45 PM PST by eleni121 (sometimes you have to cut off the limb to save the body)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman
I agree (well sort of).

Newt was a genius political strategist and organizer; it was as Majority Leader that some of his shortcomings were revealed. Newt was also a supremely gifted parliamentarian as many times he cobbled together ad hoc coalitions to push through key legislation.

The Contract with America was superbly well-crafted bit of political advertising. It neatly encapsulated a somewhat complex reform program.

The most disappointing thing about the most recent Congress was their colossal ineptitude in supporting some the President's key initiatives such as Social Security Reform. None of our current leaders had any clue about pushing through key legislation. It is not clear when there will be another chance to do this.
37 posted on 11/10/2006 7:13:45 PM PST by ggekko60506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman
I'd vote for him for any office he cared to run for. The man is brilliant.

But a political boob
49 posted on 11/10/2006 7:26:06 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman

Ditto to that !!!


70 posted on 11/10/2006 7:43:42 PM PST by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman
I'd vote for him for any office he cared to run for. The man is brilliant.

Ditto that.

He has "TOO MUCH BAGGAGE." didn't you hear? (barf)

73 posted on 11/10/2006 7:47:12 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nateman
He is a true conservative. Not a McCain, Grahm make believe conservative. I support him for his efforts to support that agenda.

My question is, will we get an actual conservative nominee? or a compromise McCain that will just screw us?

161 posted on 11/11/2006 5:00:37 PM PST by ottersnot (Dem's see victory in Iraq! through surrendur. Cut and run rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson