Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ELECTION AFTERMATH: Republican voters didn't show up at the polls
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 11/10/6 | John Wildermuth

Posted on 11/10/2006 9:51:00 AM PST by SmithL

California's Republican voters stayed home in droves on election day, as preliminary figures show voter turnout falling well below the state average in some of the most reliably GOP parts of the state.

Although the final totals won't be known for weeks, election day turnout in Fresno, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and SanDiego counties, which all have Republican pluralities, ran as much as 10 percentage points below the state's 44 percent average turnout.

"The turnout in Republican counties was low compared to the turnout in counties where Democrats hold the edge,'' said Patrick Dorinson, a spokesman for the state Republican Party. "The conservative Republican base didn't show up.''

Without that anticipated flood of votes from places such as Orange County and the Inland Empire, Tuesday was a long night for most of the statewide Republican candidates not named Arnold Schwarzenegger.

"It came as a surprise,'' admitted Stan Devereaux, a spokesman for Republican state Sen. Tom McClintock, who lost the lieutenant governor's race to Democratic Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi. "We kept looking at the returns through the night and thought we had a chance, but when the returns (from Republican counties) came in, we didn't get the turnout we expected.''

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; elections; governator; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: mike_9958

It was Ney and Taft.


101 posted on 11/10/2006 3:08:10 PM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This article is accurate. I watched the election returns for California very carefully Tuesday night, and I had detailed data which I had saved on my computer from Tom's 2002 Controller race to compare it against. Tom built up an early lead of over 180,000 votes from absentee ballots, which was far larger than his biggest lead of about 130,000 votes in 2002. I expected Tom's lead to diminish during the night, as it characteristically does for Republicans, but I thought it would still be enough to win.

California's large conservative Republican counties (Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Ventura) typically are among the last to report their results, and their votes are needed to counter the heavily liberal northern counties such as San Francisco and Alameda as well as somewhat less liberal but enormous Los Angeles. This time the votes weren't coming in. Turnout in Republican counties was poor, so even though they went even more heavily for Tom than in 2002 he ended up losing by about 300,000 votes compared to roughly 30,000 votes in 2002.

The pre-election polling looked very good for Tom, but it assumed a turnout model for Republicans which was way off this year.


102 posted on 11/10/2006 3:12:46 PM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Motivation? LOL.

California is definitely a different case than the rest of the country. The only hope there is that a charismatic conservative emerges on the stage.
103 posted on 11/10/2006 3:14:37 PM PST by Antoninus (Fire Ken Mehlman....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; Jim Robinson

"The only hope there is that a charismatic conservative emerges on the stage."

There is, Arnold.


104 posted on 11/10/2006 3:17:34 PM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yes...it's gonna leave a mark, and it's time to put a steak on it and get on to the next election....


105 posted on 11/10/2006 3:23:23 PM PST by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Um. maybe Republicans didn't come out because they didn't see a real Republican on the ballot???

Yeah, Tom McClintock is such the RINO.

Sheesh.

106 posted on 11/10/2006 3:31:32 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat (Pence for MinL; Giuliani-Watts, Giuliani-Sanford, Giuliani-Hunter, or Giuliani-Perdue in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
I've posted this to reply #40 simply for convenience and familiarity with EGD. It applies to some of the more anxiety ridden replies of the 100+ I've seen posted on this thread thus far.

Just because people didn't go to the polls, doesn't meant that they didn't vote.

Fresno County issued a record number of absentee ballots and the FC Elections Commissioner still had over 10,000 to count as of last evening. Many Republicans in the San Joaquin Valley didn't go to the polls but they voted enthusiastically

107 posted on 11/10/2006 3:59:47 PM PST by Amerigomag (Don't blame me. I don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: marajade
They don't have to cave now.

Don't have to force the willing.

108 posted on 11/10/2006 4:03:12 PM PST by Netizen (When the PINO signs his beloved scamnesty bill, the GOP officially dies and the Bush legacy is set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

You think the Republicans are willing?


109 posted on 11/10/2006 4:04:01 PM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I saw ads for all of the above.


110 posted on 11/10/2006 4:04:31 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: william clark; So Cal Rocket; ElkGroveDan; SmithL
This is BS. I live in a Republican district in the Inland Empire, and there was a high turnout.
Maybe there were more of us stuck with filling out provisional ballots than it seems, leading some to the erroneous conclusion that we didn't show up.
 
 
The following is a summary comparing voter turnout in the Republican vs. Dem strongholds from 2002 to 2006. 
The Inland Empire (Riverside, San Bernardino) definitely did not turn out in great numbers compared to 2002. 
The Orange County numbers are very curious.  200,000 new voters were registered but there were more than 50,000 fewer voters overall. 
 
Voter Turnout-2002 vs. 2006
Largely populated counties
County     Reg'd 2002 Ballots Cast 2002    % T/O 2002        Reg'd 2006 Ballots Cast 2006    % T/O 2006   Difference
 
Statewide     15,303,469            7,594,228 49.60       15,837,108            7,076,810 44.70%  
 
Democrat Strongholds  
Los Angeles      3,976,189            1,768,369 44.40%        3,914,138            1,762,547 45.00%   0.60%
Santa Clara         731,633              373,267 51.00%           749,866              379,712 50.60%   -0.40%
Alameda         662,339              350,914 52.90%           678,765              306,810 45.20%   -7.70%
Contra Costa         484,640              268,415 55.30%           486,441              260,155 53.50%   -1.80%
San Francisco         449,396              224,990 50.00%           418,285              177,400 42.40%   -7.60%
San Mateo         332,070              174,449 52.50%           350,427              162,810 46.50%   -6.00%
Sonoma         232,808              124,870 53.60%           234,891              138,128 58.80%   5.20%
Monterey         154,137                87,878 57.00%           145,540                62,123 42.70%   -14.30%
Marin         140,393                80,488 57.30%           147,311                76,238 51.80%   -5.50%
Santa Cruz         135,554                78,780 58.10%           142,415                72,017 50.60%   -7.50%
 
Republican Stronholds  
Orange      1,298,892              641,784 49.40%        1,497,365              588,335 39.30%   -10.10%
San Diego      1,411,808              683,062 48.30%        1,381,835              625,586 45.30%   -3.00%
Riverside         649,670              309,952 47.70%           754,986              260,591 34.50%   -13.20%
San Bernardino         616,402              294,151 47.70%           751,652              276,454 36.80%   -10.90%
Ventura         391,160              199,708 51.00%           391,077              143,814 36.80%   -14.20%
Fresno         344,359              155,205 45.00%           331,968              154,177 46.40%   1.40%
Kern         259,786              138,087 53.10%           289,233              132,106 45.70%   -7.40%
San Luis Obispo         140,659                83,903 59.60%           155,495                81,290 52.30%   -7.30%

111 posted on 11/10/2006 4:48:42 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
California Voter Turnout
Largely populated counties
County       Reg'd 2006    2002 Turnout    2004 Turnout    2006 Turnout
Statewide        15,837,108 49.60% 75.90% 44.70%
Democrat Strongholds
Alameda             678,765 52.90% 76.50% 45.20%
Contra Costa             486,441 55.30% 82.90% 53.50%
Los Angeles          3,914,138 44.40% 77.60% 45.00%
Marin             147,311 57.30% 89.40% 51.80%
Monterey             145,540 57.00% 81.10% 42.70%
San Francisco             418,285 50.00% 74.30% 42.40%
San Mateo             350,427 52.50% 78.30% 46.50%
Santa Clara             749,866 51.00% 70.50% 50.60%
Santa Cruz             142,415 58.10% 84.30% 50.60%
Sonoma             234,891 53.60% 89.30% 58.80%
Republican Strongholds
Fresno             331,968 45.00% 70.90% 46.40%
Kern             289,233 53.10% 72.70% 45.70%
Orange          1,497,365 49.40% 73.10% 39.30%
Riverside             754,986 47.70% 73.10% 34.50%
San Bernardino             751,652 47.70% 72.60% 36.80%
San Diego          1,381,835 48.30% 75.60% 45.30%
San Luis Obispo             155,495 59.60% 80.10% 52.30%
Ventura             391,077 51.00% 79.30% 36.80%

112 posted on 11/10/2006 5:19:10 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I saw lots of Arnold and Angelides ads.

I saw several Garamendi ads but never saw a single McClintock ad.

I saw a couple Poochigian ads and many, many Jerry Brown ads.

I saw TONS of Poizner ads. (He was reported to have an $11 million dollar ad buy, running against the hapless Bustamante no less--never saw an ad for Cruz).

The last week, I saw a couple Chiang and Strickland ads (I think those were the ones funded by the warring Tribes who set up IEs)


113 posted on 11/10/2006 5:27:33 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
If it makes anyone feel any better, neither did 600,000 of Hillie's voters from last time around.

Heh heh heh ...

114 posted on 11/10/2006 5:29:16 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
yipee!
115 posted on 11/10/2006 5:48:05 PM PST by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It was definitely a shame to see parental notification voted down again.. at least prop 87 got kaboshed and that parcel tax monstrosity.


116 posted on 11/10/2006 6:28:40 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Aloha!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: LS

Talk about privacy being sent to hell....


117 posted on 11/10/2006 6:46:36 PM PST by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

No argument from me!


118 posted on 11/10/2006 6:47:25 PM PST by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: marajade

...and that took care of that. Yuck!


119 posted on 11/10/2006 6:48:09 PM PST by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We sure have some silly voters. They complain about the GOP all year long, sit out the election, and then will be complaining for the next two years about losing

No need to worry. One of these days, complaining will be a hate crime and then only outlaws will have complaints....
120 posted on 11/10/2006 7:14:24 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson