Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The stats are Available at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14289273/
1 posted on 11/10/2006 9:04:54 AM PST by screw boll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: screw boll

Not only that but many House seats were decided on razor slim margins.


2 posted on 11/10/2006 9:07:20 AM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll
A loss is still a loss, but I agree with you that Tuesday's election results were hardly a dramatic sea-change in Washington, D.C.

There are something like 40 Democratic House members representing districts that Bush won in 2004, and you can be sure none of them have any long-term certainty about the duration of their stay in Washington.

3 posted on 11/10/2006 9:07:27 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

That's meaningless.

Ford lost the National election by less than 10,000 votes, I believe it was Indiana and Hawaii.

A close loss is still a loss.

We wouldn't have lost if we were good enough.


4 posted on 11/10/2006 9:07:56 AM PST by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush if given a chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll
So was it a lack of conservative votes or libertarians voting L instead of R?
5 posted on 11/10/2006 9:07:57 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll
There's a NEW PETITION out there.
6 posted on 11/10/2006 9:08:12 AM PST by MaineVoter2002 (Election 2006 - Democrat Win, Conservative Mandate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

This is all true and shouldn't be overlooked. (keeping in mind that some GOP votes stayed home, some voted third party, etc....not every vote lost to GOP was a switch to D's...still, the point is spot on).


7 posted on 11/10/2006 9:10:56 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll
it is time for sole searching,

I'm searching and I found these.

Seriously, if the Republicans had run a halfway decent campaign and didn't waste a penny on trying to keep losers like Chafee in power I think we could of won. Too much effort was made to keep RINOs around.

8 posted on 11/10/2006 9:11:00 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Hey Kerry, What part of showing heels and ass is a winning strategy in Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

I have to admit...that makes me feel better. I have been feeling awful alone out here in 'Tester'country, especially with his smiling face plastered all over the newspapers around here.


9 posted on 11/10/2006 9:11:01 AM PST by MTMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

We need to make every secretary of state at the state level a republican. Every voter roll should be purged of suspect, dead, illegal registrations. Voting should require ID that is verified with driver liecense or motor vehicle renewals. Voting registration should be tighter than car ownership.


10 posted on 11/10/2006 9:11:57 AM PST by x_plus_one (Franklin Graham: "Allah is not the God of Moses. Allah had no son")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

That's it? Talk about razor thin!


12 posted on 11/10/2006 9:12:37 AM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll
Conservatives have a chance to do something historically/politically monumental in two years, if they refuse to cede one millimeter to the Republicans, (who by the way were responsible for Tuesday's punch-in-the-gut).
It is imperative that the next chair of the RNC is not just a conservative, but a Reagan-conservative, with a strong Jeffersonian tinge.
13 posted on 11/10/2006 9:12:44 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll
Are you assuming that of the 7,231 who voted for the dim, half would have voted for the pubbie instead. If so, I'm not sure that's correct and instead we would have needed a full 7,232.

But regardless, your point is it's a slim majority and we just needed a few more points (relatively speaking) on our side to make the difference.

Good point to which I agree whole heatedly. When the analysts sit down and crunch the numbers for results based on facts, I hope they will make the same observation.

14 posted on 11/10/2006 9:12:57 AM PST by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

I hate to bring this up but our dalliance in the minority might be longer than people relaize.

The 2008 makes this year look like a walk through the park
Races to watch
1.1 Retiring Senators
1.2 Possible retiring Senators
1.2.1 Wayne Allard (R) of Colorado
1.2.2 Joe Biden (D) of Delaware
1.2.3 Susan Collins (R) of Maine
1.2.4 Thad Cochran (R) of Mississippi
1.2.5 Elizabeth Dole (R) of North Carolina
1.2.6 Pete Domenici (R) of New Mexico
1.2.7 Chuck Hagel (R) of Nebraska
1.2.8 Jim Inhofe (R) of Oklahoma
1.2.9 John Kerry (D) of Massachusetts
1.2.10 Frank Lautenberg (D) of New Jersey
1.2.11 Carl Levin (D) of Michigan
1.2.12 Pat Roberts (R) of Kansas
1.2.13 Jay Rockefeller (D) of West Virginia
1.2.14 Ted Stevens (R) of Alaska
1.2.15 John Warner (R) of Virginia

1.3 Notable Democratic incumbent races
1.3.1 Dick Durbin of Illinois
1.3.2 Tom Harkin of Iowa
1.3.3 Tim Johnson of South Dakota
1.3.4 Mary Landrieu of Louisiana
1.3.5 Mark Pryor of Arkansas

1.4 Notable Republican incumbent races
1.4.1 Lamar Alexander of Tennessee
1.4.2 Saxby Chambliss of Georgia
1.4.3 Norm Coleman of Minnesota
1.4.4 John Cornyn of Texas
1.4.5 Lindsey Graham of South Carolina
1.4.6 Mitch McConnell of Kentucky
1.4.7 Jeff Sessions of Alabama
1.4.8 Gordon Smith of Oregon
1.4.9 John Sununu of New Hampshire

Looking at the incumbant list what strikes me is we have a much much tougher row to hoe than the Dems

Lets not even talk about if we dont by the grace of God get these Governorships back in Ohio, Colo, etc and somehow get Calif the redistricting under the Census will be brutual


16 posted on 11/10/2006 9:14:16 AM PST by catholicfreeper (Geaux Tigers SEC FOOTBALL ROCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

Well perhaps our gop "leaders" will have some tie to contemplate & focus. Come back in 08 a LOT SMARTER!


17 posted on 11/10/2006 9:14:21 AM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

Republicans were one candidate away from holding the Senate.

Montana elected a Democrat called Not Conrad Burns. Given a choice between two candidates called Not Conrad Burns there is little doubt Montana would have chosen the Republican.

Unfortunately, and unaccountably, despite the evident popularity of not being Conrad Burns, Republicans ran the only candidate in the entire state who was not Not Conrad Burns.


19 posted on 11/10/2006 9:14:57 AM PST by qlangley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

Nothing really changed, the country is still as divided as before. The difference was the Rats finally decided that they would be willing to sacrifice the stranglehold the liberal kooks had in the party, to win an election. They basically kicked out all the centrists, but they finally realized they would never win another election unless they would allow some pro-life, pro-gun, religious candidates to run.


20 posted on 11/10/2006 9:15:06 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

True enough. And if 537 votes had changed in Florida six years ago, there would have been no GW Bush administration.


21 posted on 11/10/2006 9:15:42 AM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

It is called the Democrat Vote Fraud Machine. The Dems will always win close elections because they can find votes at the end of an election night. 2000 and 2004 were not as close as they appeared because Dems tried everything to try to make up the votes.


24 posted on 11/10/2006 9:16:40 AM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll; 4CJ
Republicans Were 5,038 Votes Short of a 51-49 Senate Majority

4CJ, truly, truly, the conspiracy might just be a fact, instead of a conspiracy.

Wonder if the Lord really spoke to Ff-150, or he was full of caca???

28 posted on 11/10/2006 9:18:59 AM PST by 100-Fold_Return (In Prisons Tattletales Are the Same as Child-Molesters...hmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: screw boll

While this is all true, you are neglecting to mention the wild advantages of incumbency. These Dems who skirted in with razor-thin margins immediately become 15-point favorites the day they take office.

Add to that the fact that Dems now control the majority of state governments, which are in charge of drawing up congressional districts.

No one should think for a minute that it's not going to take very hard work to win back the majority.

Rove, you magnificent bastard(?).


29 posted on 11/10/2006 9:19:38 AM PST by dollar_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson