To: screw boll
A loss is still a loss, but I agree with you that Tuesday's election results were hardly a dramatic sea-change in Washington, D.C.
There are something like 40 Democratic House members representing districts that Bush won in 2004, and you can be sure none of them have any long-term certainty about the duration of their stay in Washington.
3 posted on
11/10/2006 9:07:27 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Alberta's Child
What are you guys talking about. It was a BLUE TIDE and America has given liberals a mandate. I heard that myself from Chuck Schumer and Eyeball Pelosi!!! Oh yea, the NYT and the Boston Globe said it too.
26 posted on
11/10/2006 9:18:41 AM PST by
Holicheese
(Beerfest could be the greatest movie ever made!)
To: Alberta's Child
There are something like 40 Democratic House members representing districts that Bush won in 2004, and you can be sure none of them have any long-term certainty about the duration of their stay in Washington. It sure didn't hurt them in 2006, did it? Not a single Democrat from any of those districts running for re-election lost.
To: Alberta's Child
This is a loss...but for Webb in six years...he likely loses very easily if a bright new face for the Republicans in Virginia shows up and really does talk issues.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson