Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: Now council bans the use of 'political correctness' at work (The phrase, not the policies)
The Daily Mail (U.K.) ^ | November 1, 2006 | CHRIS BROOKE

Posted on 11/01/2006 1:52:53 PM PST by Stoat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Stoat
You can find the term "politically correct" used here on the Usenet dated December 14, 1981
21 posted on 11/01/2006 3:17:04 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

'The term political correctness was coined in 1988 by John O'Sullivan III, who was a member of the Ku Klux Klan. He was making an after dinner speech complaining about how Black Americans were being allowed to take the jobs traditionally reserved for the white majority because of a wave of political correctness.

Proof that this particular claim is a lie can be found here, where the term "political correctness" is used on June 19th, 1983. I urge Freepers interested in this term to do some searches on Google Groups, which stores messages sent across the Usnet through the early 1980s. You'll notice that the term "politically correct" is used frequently by leftists until they lose control of it because the truth is, that's the source of the term.


22 posted on 11/01/2006 3:28:27 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Image hosted by Photobucket.com that FPOS poofter has never been punched in the mouth if he thinks moving a pen on a desk or hearing a word is the same thing... i'd love to demonstrate to him the difference 8^)
23 posted on 11/01/2006 3:48:21 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Kirklees Council employs more than 18,000 people and has a budget of more than £470 million.

Isn't that remarkable? A fly speck on the map, a remote corner of one of the loneliest shires of England, with fewer than four hundred thousand people, needs eighteen thousand socialist goldbrickers to administer its affairs.


Mesa, Arizona, of comparable physical size and population, manages with only 4000.

-ccm

24 posted on 11/01/2006 3:57:10 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
Proof that this particular claim is a lie can be found here, where the term "political correctness" is used on June 19th, 1983.

Fascinating look at old NNTP headers and net addresses.

25 posted on 11/01/2006 5:35:43 PM PST by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

"Politically correct" is at least as old as Lenin. It may be that this Council has already banned the sort of history book in which one might find that information.


26 posted on 11/01/2006 5:43:31 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith
Someone on the radio just used the term, "intellectual fascism." Talk about hitting the nail on the head.

A great expression.  Was it used in the context of commentary on speech or thought control?

27 posted on 11/01/2006 6:47:49 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
I thought Donna Shalala coined the term "political correctness".

Others here have done some SUPERB research on the roots of the term; their posts are definitely worth a look.

Even if she didn't coin the expression, she certainly did her part to implement it in the worst possibly manners of policy.

28 posted on 11/01/2006 6:50:35 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
What nitwits! The phrase 'politically correct' originally came from the left as a description of a secular-leftist analog of 'holier than thou'.

Their attribution of the term is definitely wrong, and is part of the all encompassing lies of PC and the Left.

29 posted on 11/01/2006 6:52:24 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: burzum
Well to be fair the term was offending some people. To be pol... err, to be multi-culturally and diplomatically (MAD) sensitive, we should just call it being MAD. That won't offend anyone except those who are angry already (and they are already a lost cause).

I'm sure it's true that some were offended, but I would suggest that the ones who were offended were the ones who were (are) attempting to inflict Leftist social engineering upon others, by legal fiat.  They are offended because their hidden agenda has been exposed and properly ridiculed.

30 posted on 11/01/2006 6:55:43 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Actually, I believe it is a translation of one of Mao's edicts.
 

Others here have done some excellent research on the expression, their posts are well worth a look.

31 posted on 11/01/2006 6:57:29 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Word ungood in Newspeak. Nonesuch existing elsewise.

:-)

32 posted on 11/01/2006 7:02:24 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I would say both. There's a situation that took place in a Twin Cities public school yesterday, and it appears that "political correctness" along with "diversity" stifled any common sense reaction to it. A listener called in and railed about both. If I recall correctly, he indicated "political correctness" prevents anyone from saying what should be said and then called it "intellectual fascism."


33 posted on 11/01/2006 7:08:59 PM PST by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS) Gun owners have illustrated rights are individual and can be protected by individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
HERE's a 1964 reference to the term in a bit of cant from Marxist theoretician Mario Tronti:

Both have their material base in the process (still slowly developing) by which the class and the historical organisations of the class — the “working class” and the “labour movement” — first become divided, and then come to counterpose each other. What does this mean concretely, and where will it lead us? The first thing to say is that the goal, the aim of this approach is the solid recomposition of a politically correct relationship between the two moments.

Certain Socialists agree. John Molyneux gives this reference to Paul Berman in the International Socialism Journal article referenced HERE -

'Politically Correct' was originally a phrase on the Leninist left to denote someone who steadfastly toed the party line. Then it evolved into 'PC', an ironic phrase among wised up leftists to denote someone whose line-toeing fervour was too much to bear. Only in connection with the PC debate itself did the phrase get picked up by people who had no fidelity to radicalism at all, but who relished the nasty syllables for their twist of irony.

By 1988 the term was so old it was already being used in irony as it is today by its foes. Its proponents apparently have only lately caught onto the sting of the thing and have therefore banned it. Pathetic.

34 posted on 11/01/2006 7:15:43 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith
I would say both. There's a situation that took place in a Twin Cities public school yesterday, and it appears that "political correctness" along with "diversity" stifled any common sense reaction to it. A listener called in and railed about both. If I recall correctly, he indicated "political correctness" prevents anyone from saying what should be said and then called it "intellectual fascism."

Thank you for the clarification.  I think that the caller was exactly right, and we should all use that term as well as terms like it to call out the Left and their endless efforts at underhanded Socialist / Stalinist manipulation. Uncle Joe would be proud of the Modern Left's sneakiness and shameless doublespeak.

35 posted on 11/01/2006 7:52:36 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
and the ACLU now says they are not socialists, they are conservatives.

Gag me with a very large spoon....

This politicial is just evidence of Doublespeak BS that dominates the POLICALL CORRECTNESS movement.

(iow: what a weenie)

What is breathtaking to me is their shamelessness about their motives....it's a reflection of how stupid they think that the 'average' person is.

36 posted on 11/01/2006 7:58:17 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: norton
So much to comment on.

All Socialists need to be put in cages to prevent their inflicting their goals upon humanity as well as to prevent their procreation, and then studied so that their ilk can never sully the face of the planet again.  How many billions of lives have either been lost or ruined as a direc result of the Left's policies?  It's an infestation that must be eradicated.


But "using the phrase can equal a physical attack" lost out to
"the word 'ethnic' is...outlawed for being not 'appropriately descriptive."

Gotta wonder what they had in mind to replace 'ethnic'...?

I'm guessing that their verbiage selection criteria would run something along the lines of:


37 posted on 11/01/2006 8:12:41 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore
Eating their own tail again.

The ludicrous and illogical nature of it all would be grand fun to sit back and watch if it wasn't for all of the lives that the Left and their idiotic policies ruin and destroy along the way.

38 posted on 11/01/2006 8:17:09 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith
Someone on the radio just used the term, "intellectual fascism." Talk about hitting the nail on the head.

Oh, I like that. That just replaced "political correctness" in my lexicon.

39 posted on 11/01/2006 8:21:11 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
Wow, UK bans more and more speech every day...........amazing! No longer is there free speech in the UK at all. If we don't correct some of the policies here, our own will erode more and more!

Very true, and we can witness it from an even closer vantage point than Great Britain.  Canada has bushel baskets full of speech codes that will get you thrown in JAIL if you dare to say the wrong thing about the wrong 'type' of person.  "Hate Speech" is very much a serious crime in Canada.

40 posted on 11/01/2006 8:21:16 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson